Find Nearby Plumbers In Evanston, Illinois

Waterworks Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks for professionalism (88.5), project completion (87.0), and technical experience (85.5). The company excels in punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and workmanship quality, with extensive evidence of same-day or next-day service and thorough problem-solving. Pricing scores well at 82.0, though some reviews note the company is moderately expensive relative to competitors; however, most customers view the cost as justified by quality and honesty. The overwhelming majority of reviews (146 of 152) are 5-star ratings with specific, detailed praise, indicating genuine customer satisfaction rather than generic endorsements.

• Potential fake review pattern detected: 6 reviews with empty or minimal text (just ratings or single words like '.', 'unknown', 'Cleared') dated 2015-2022 suggest possible automated or placeholder entries. These were included in scoring but warrant scrutiny.
• Duplicate review identified: The AirBnB emergency leak story appears twice (2023-06-10 and 2022-08-31) with identical text, suggesting either a repost or data duplication.
• Recency skew: Approximately 65% of reviews are from 2018 onwards, with a notable cluster of 5-star reviews all dated 2025-05-10 (5 reviews on same date). While recent reviews are positive, this concentration warrants caution regarding potential review manipulation or batch submissions.
• Negative reviews are substantive: The 6 one-star reviews (2022, 2021, 2019) contain specific complaints (abandoned jobs, unprofessional staff, billing disputes, no-show appointments, poor receptionist interactions) that appear genuine and unrelated to each other, lending credibility to the overall dataset.
• One review (2019-10-05) explicitly documents a dispute with the company over review reporting and personal information disclosure, suggesting potential reputation management issues.

This WW Score of 86.2 is highly reliable, based on 152 reviews with strong consensus across all four dimensions. The HIGH confidence rating is supported by 68+ mentions per dimension and consistent patterns of praise for professionalism, timeliness, and workmanship spanning over a decade. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that recent reviews show a concentration of 5-star ratings, some negative reviews document legitimate service failures (abandoned jobs, no-shows), and the company has faced customer service friction with office staff in isolated cases. The score reflects a genuinely strong plumbing company with occasional operational lapses.

J Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 86.2. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 16 reviews explicitly praising responsiveness, punctuality, politeness, and clear communication. Project completion shows solid execution with most jobs finished on time and to satisfaction, though one significant negative review (1-star, July 2024) documents incomplete work on a main line clog that required a costly callback, materially lowering this dimension's score. Pricing is competitive and transparent, with multiple reviews citing fair and reasonable rates. Experience and technical knowledge are well-documented across reviews, with customers noting skilled workmanship and effective problem-solving. The July 2024 negative review is the primary detractor and appears credible with specific technical details.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The Navien tankless water heater review appears twice (2020-03-03 with different timestamps), suggesting possible data duplication rather than fake reviews.
• SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE OUTLIER: One 1-star review (2024-07-28) documents incomplete work on a main line clog with a required $100 callback. This is recent, specific, and credible—not a fake review. It materially impacts Project Completion scoring and suggests quality control issues on certain job types.
• RECENCY CONCERN: 12 of 25 reviews are from 2020 or earlier (48%), with only 4 reviews from the past 12 months (2024). Recent performance may differ from historical data.
• MINOR INCONSISTENCY: One review (2020-02-19) rates 4.0 stars and mentions incomplete work requiring a return visit, but provides minimal detail. This aligns with the July 2024 complaint pattern.

This WW Score of 86.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across all four dimensions with substantial mention counts (5-16 reviews per dimension). However, the recent 1-star review documenting incomplete work on a main line clog is a material concern that suggests potential quality control issues on complex jobs; customers should be aware of this pattern and request clear guarantees on work completion.

CL Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous communication appear in the vast majority of reviews. Project completion is well-supported, with many reviewers noting jobs were finished efficiently, paperwork was handled, and technicians cleaned up after themselves. Pricing is mentioned favorably in several reviews, with words like 'affordable,' 'reasonable,' and 'significantly less than competitors' appearing across multiple independent reviews. Experience and technical knowledge are praised in a meaningful number of reviews, though one 1-star review raises a concern about a misdiagnosis on a backflow device, which slightly tempers the experience score. Overall, the volume and consistency of positive feedback across years supports a reliable and trustworthy score.

• Two reviews are blank (no text, only a 5-star rating dated 2020-06-10) and were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• Two reviews dated 2019-09-30 and 2019-10-01 are nearly identical in phrasing and content, suggesting a possible duplicate or copied review. Confidence in those two data points is reduced.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 20 of 37) are older than 12 months from the most recent review date, and many are 2–5+ years old. The most recent reviews (2024) are fewer in number but remain positive.
• One 1-star review (2022-06-10) alleges a misdiagnosis on a backflow device, with the customer claiming another company passed the device immediately. This is the only negative review and was factored into the experience score.
• Several reviews covering backflow testing are highly routine in nature and follow similar patterns of praise (responsive, on-time, efficient). While not conclusively fake, the repetitive structure across many backflow-related reviews warrants mild caution. No score reduction was applied beyond conservative scoring, but users should be aware.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — it is supported by a solid volume of reviews across multiple years with consistent positive signals, but is tempered by the heavy concentration of routine backflow testing jobs, a small number of blank or near-duplicate reviews, and only one negative review that may indicate an isolated skills gap.

Faruk and Aqua Smart Plumbing receive consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, clear communication, patience, and courteous demeanor. Project completion scores are high, with multiple reviewers noting jobs were finished as described, on time, and with follow-through, though one negative review raises a concern about a job where Faruk appeared unfamiliar with a tankless water heater system and could not complete the temperature reset. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and transparent, with upfront quotes and no hidden fees praised across many reviews, but the single 1-star review alleging a $295 charge for 20 minutes of faucet work meaningfully tempers the pricing score. Experience scores are strong overall, supported by detailed accounts of complex problem-solving, code-compliant solutions, and technical explanations, though the tankless heater incident introduces a credible data point of a skill gap in that specific area.

• One significant negative review (1-star, dated 2016-06-02) alleges overcharging ($295 for ~20 minutes of work) and inability to complete a tankless water heater temperature reset, with Faruk reportedly resorting to internet searches and then asking the customer for the manual. This is a credible, specific complaint and has been factored into both the pricing and experience scores.
• Two 5-star reviews posted on the same date (2016-06-03) with similar generic praise and no specific job details. These may be responses to the negative review posted the day prior (2016-06-02) and could be solicited or retaliatory reviews. Confidence in those two specific reviews is reduced, though they were not excluded entirely.
• The majority of reviews (approximately 18 out of 21) are older than 12 months relative to a current 2024/2025 analysis date, with most dating from 2015–2022. Only one review is from 2022, and none are from 2023 or 2024. Recency of data is a concern — the score reflects historical performance and may not represent current service quality.
• Review dated 2019-08-31 ('I highly recommend Aqua Smart Plumbing! Faruk was fantastic! I will be using them for all of my plumbing needs in the future. Thank you!!!!') contains no specific details about the job, pricing, or outcome. It was counted for overall sentiment but contributed minimally to dimension scoring due to lack of usable specifics.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high reliability given the volume of detailed, specific reviews across all four dimensions, but should be interpreted with caution due to the age of most reviews (largely 2015–2022), one credible negative experience involving overcharging and a skill gap, and two potentially solicited 5-star reviews posted the day after the negative review.

North Side Renovations has an overwhelmingly positive track record across a large volume of reviews spanning over a decade, with consistent praise for professionalism, punctuality, communication, and quality of workmanship on a wide variety of renovation and repair projects. Pricing is generally described as fair, competitive, and transparent with itemized estimates, though a small number of reviewers noted price increases after the fact or felt costs were high, which tempers the pricing score modestly. Project completion is strong overall, with the majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished on time and on budget, and that Jeremy honored callbacks and corrected issues without argument; however, several reviews noted delays, rushed finishing work, or abandoned follow-through on estimates and appointments, which meaningfully reduces this dimension's score. The most significant negative pattern across reviews is a recurring failure of responsiveness at the pre-project stage — multiple reviewers reported Jeremy scheduling estimate appointments and then not showing up, not calling back, or going silent after providing a quote, which is a material professionalism concern that prevents a higher score. Workmanship quality is consistently rated highly, with reviewers frequently noting skilled problem-solving, attention to detail, and willingness to correct mistakes, supporting a strong experience score.

• RESPONSIVENESS FAILURE PATTERN: At least 6 reviews (2014-04-24, 2014-05-12, 2013-11-24, 2020-12-02, 2019-02-18, and the 2019-11-01 negative reply review) explicitly describe Jeremy failing to show up for scheduled appointments, not returning calls, or going silent after providing quotes. This is a consistent and credible pattern that materially impacts the professionalism score.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The reviews dated 2015-12-13 (with timestamp 11:15:09) and 2015-12-13 (with timestamp 00:00:00) are nearly word-for-word identical. This appears to be the same review submitted twice, likely from the same customer on the same platform or cross-posted. Only one instance was counted in scoring.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The reviews dated 2012-10-31 (with timestamp 22:01:30) and 2012-10-31 (with timestamp 00:00:00) are nearly word-for-word identical. Same situation as above — counted only once.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are older than 3 years relative to the most recent review date (2023-02-09). Only approximately 4 reviews fall within the 12 months prior to the most recent review. The bulk of the review corpus dates from 2011–2019, meaning recent performance trends are difficult to assess with confidence.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW RESPONSE CONCERN: The 2019-11-01 review is a rebuttal posted by a dissatisfied customer responding to what appears to be a contractor reply on Yelp. This suggests Jeremy disputed the original negative review, which is noted for context but does not change the scoring since the customer's account is detailed and credible.
• CLEANUP/FINISHING QUALITY ISSUES: Multiple reviews (2015-08-07 one-star, 2014-09-02, 2015-04-29, and others) specifically note poor cleanup, rushed finishing work, or subcontractor quality issues. While Jeremy generally addressed these when raised, the pattern is notable enough to moderately reduce both project completion and experience scores.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Despite the high volume of 5-star reviews, the reviews are sufficiently varied in language, detail, project type, and date range to be considered authentic. The presence of multiple credible negative and mixed reviews further supports overall authenticity.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review corpus of 125 reviews spanning over a decade, with all four dimensions supported by HIGH confidence mention counts, making this one of the more reliable scores possible — however, consumers should weigh the recurring pre-project responsiveness failure pattern and the age of most reviews carefully, as recent performance data is limited to only a handful of reviews from 2022–2023.

AG Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism and pricing being particular highlights. Dozens of reviewers praised courteous, punctual technicians and fair, transparent pricing — with one reviewer explicitly noting a quote of $185–$300 versus a competitor's $1,320 for the same job. Project completion scores are solid but tempered by two detailed 1-star reviews describing repeated failures on a tankless water heater installation, including improper part installation, a month-long wait for an $11 part, and a refusal to accept responsibility for faulty work. Experience scores are similarly strong in the majority of reviews but are pulled down by a 2-star review noting technicians who struggled to locate a hookup point and required supervisor assistance, and a 4-star review describing careless workmanship including damage to a bathtub. The overall picture is of a reliably competent local plumber with excellent customer service, but with a documented pattern of quality control issues on more complex or multi-visit jobs.

• 19 reviews contain no text whatsoever (blank, 'unknown', '.', or single-word entries) and were excluded from dimension scoring. Their star ratings were noted but provide no usable qualitative data.
• A significant portion of reviews predate 2020 — approximately 55 of 101 reviews are from 2013 or earlier. These older reviews carry reduced weight in scoring. The most recent reviews (2022–2024) remain consistently positive.
• Two separate 1-star reviews describe nearly identical complaints about the same tankless water heater installation — repeated failures, a month-long wait for a part, improper installation of a clip/elbow fitting, and refusal to accept responsibility. These appear to be written by two different members of the same household describing the same ongoing situation, which is worth noting but does not constitute fake review activity.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary meaningfully in length, detail, writing style, and sentiment. Negative reviews are specific and credible.
• The 1-star review from 2012 describing two missed appointments and complete disregard for scheduling is an isolated older incident but represents a meaningful professionalism failure that was factored into scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and largely credible review set spanning over a decade, with sufficient recent data to be considered reliable — however, users should note that complex or multi-visit jobs carry a documented risk of quality control issues based on multiple detailed negative accounts.