This company shows a stark divide in customer experience. Professionalism scores are mixed—some customers praise prompt, courteous service and reliability over decades, while others report poor communication, lack of follow-up, and messy work. Pricing is a critical weakness, with multiple customers reporting inflated bills, unexplained charges, and dishonest labor hour padding. Project completion ...
Read more Score Narrative
This company shows a stark divide in customer experience. Professionalism scores are mixed—some customers praise prompt, courteous service and reliability over decades, while others report poor communication, lack of follow-up, and messy work. Pricing is a critical weakness, with multiple customers reporting inflated bills, unexplained charges, and dishonest labor hour padding. Project completion is severely compromised by reports of abandoned work and unfinished callbacks. Technical experience appears solid when work is completed, but this is overshadowed by systemic issues in billing transparency and project follow-through.
Flags & Warnings
• CRITICAL: Billing fraud pattern detected across multiple reviews (2023, 2018)—customers report 2-3 hours of labor charges for work never performed and unexplained invoice padding. This is a serious red flag.
• Project abandonment reported: Review from 2023-04-28 explicitly states 'They start projects and don't come back to finish' with unresponsive management (Brad Dunlap).
• Recency concern: Most negative reviews are from 2022-2023 (recent), while positive reviews are older (2019-2022). This suggests deteriorating service quality over time.
• Inconsistent service quality: Positive reviews emphasize reliability and professionalism; negative reviews describe dishonesty and poor accountability. This inconsistency warrants caution.
• Communication failures: Multiple reviews cite lack of explanation, no follow-up calls, and poor customer service responsiveness.
Reliability Statement
This score should be treated with MODERATE-to-LOW trust. While the sample size is small (7 reviews), the pattern of billing dishonesty and project abandonment in recent reviews is concerning and suggests systemic operational issues that outweigh isolated positive experiences from loyal long-term customers.
Read less