Find Nearby Plumbers In Chicago, Illinois

Midwest Hydro Jetting and Sewer Service earns a strong WW Score driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning multiple years. Professionalism is the most frequently praised dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly citing punctuality, courteous communication, cleanliness (boot covers, masks, tarps), and a non-pressuring sales approach. Project completion scores are high, with numerous reviewers noting jobs finished correctly the first time, warranties honored on callbacks, and technicians persisting through difficult clogs rather than abandoning the work — though two negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) cite an incomplete job with a blank invoice and a failure to commit to service, which moderately tempers this score. Pricing is consistently described as fair, competitive, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting quotes were honored exactly and that the company beat competitor estimates; one reviewer noted service was slightly more expensive than expected, and another described a fee-for-quote policy that caused friction. Technical experience is strongly evidenced across the review set, with reviewers frequently praising diagnostic accuracy, use of specialized equipment (hydrojetting, power rodding, camera inspection), and the team's ability to succeed where other plumbers had failed.

• Two 1-star reviews and two 2-star reviews exist in the dataset and represent meaningful negative signals: one describes an incomplete job with a request to sign a blank invoice and a drain left still clogged; another describes a failure to commit to service and poor communication; a third describes frustration with a fee-for-quote policy and refusal to provide referrals. These are not fabricated-seeming complaints and are factored into scoring.
• Two reviews contain no text content (one rated 5.0, one rated 1.0) and were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• A moderate pattern of generic short-form praise exists (e.g., 'Great work!', 'Good guys. Good work.', 'Excellent guys, Excellent team') across several reviews. These were counted for overall sentiment but not used to drive dimension scores due to lack of specificity.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star. While the volume and specificity of detailed reviews lend credibility, the near-universal positive rating warrants mild caution. No strong evidence of coordinated fake reviews was detected — most positive reviews contain specific technician names, job descriptions, and situational details consistent with genuine experiences.
• Several reviews predate 2023 and may reflect a slightly different operational period. However, recent 2024–2025 reviews are consistent in quality and tone with older reviews, suggesting sustained performance rather than decline.

This WW Score is highly reliable, supported by one of the largest and most detailed review sets analyzed, with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, consistent specificity in reviewer accounts, and a multi-year track record — tempered only slightly by a small number of credible negative reviews that prevent a perfect score.

Chicago Plumbing Repair demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of punctuality, politeness, responsiveness, and communication—Adalberto and his team arrive early or on time, explain work clearly, and maintain professional demeanor even when correcting previous contractors' mistakes. Project completion is strong with multiple reviews confirming jobs finished completely and on time, including complex work like pipe replacement and same-day service. Pricing is repeatedly described as fair, reasonable, competitive, and transparent with no hidden charges or gimmicks. Experience is evident through skilled problem-solving, technical knowledge, and efficient execution across diverse plumbing challenges. All 16 reviews are recent (2021–2024) with the majority from the past 12 months, providing strong recency support.

• All 16 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is statistically unusual and warrants caution. However, reviews contain specific details (sediment blockage diagnosis, garbage disposal repair, gas line work, boiler installation) and vary in length and narrative style, suggesting authenticity rather than fake reviews.
• No reviews mention any delays, incomplete work, communication failures, or pricing disputes, which is atypical. This may indicate either genuinely exceptional service or a selection bias toward satisfied customers who chose to review.
• Recency is strong: 13 of 16 reviews are from 2022 or later, with 6 from 2024. This provides good current-state confidence.

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable based on 16 recent reviews with consistent, specific praise across all dimensions and HIGH confidence across all four metrics. However, the absence of any critical feedback should be interpreted with appropriate caution—this score reflects the experiences of customers who chose to leave reviews and may not represent the full customer population.

Chicago Home ReVision demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised across all 8 reviews, with explicit mentions of prompt responsiveness, clear communication, flexibility, and courteous behavior from owner John and his team. Project completion is uniformly strong, with multiple reviews confirming on-time delivery, budget adherence, and comprehensive follow-through on all requested work. Experience and workmanship quality are well-documented through detailed descriptions of tile work, bathroom remodels, and finishing details. Pricing is explicitly noted as fair and transparent in 5 reviews, with budget alignment to initial quotes. The contractor has earned strong trust signals including repeat business offers and willingness to provide references.

• All 8 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or complaints. While the detailed, specific language and varied project descriptions suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews, the perfect rating distribution is unusual and should be noted.
• Most reviews are 2-4 years old (2020-2023). Only one review is from 2023, suggesting limited recent data. Consider requesting more current feedback to confirm sustained performance.
• Review from 2022-02-16 is a follow-up/update to a prior review, not an independent assessment. This slightly reduces the effective independent review count.

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable, based on 8 detailed reviews with consistent, specific praise across all dimensions and strong mention counts (5-8 per dimension). However, the absence of any critical feedback and age of most reviews (2-4 years old) suggest validating with recent customer references before making high-stakes decisions.

AquaPro Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courteous communication, cleanliness (shoe covers, drop cloths), and responsiveness including same-day and emergency availability. Pricing is explicitly called out as fair, transparent, and competitive across dozens of reviews, with multiple customers noting AquaPro was cheaper than competitors without sacrificing quality. Project completion is well-supported: the vast majority of reviewers confirm jobs were finished fully, on time, and cleanly, with only one notable failure (a missed appointment in 2022 that generated the sole 1-star review). Technical experience and problem-solving ability are praised across a wide range of job types — water heaters, sump pumps, sewer lines, filtration systems, and pipe replacement — with several reviewers noting AquaPro solved issues other plumbers could not. The one negative review (November 2022) describes a missed appointment due to a text-confirmation miscommunication, which is a legitimate professionalism concern but is isolated and not corroborated by any other review.

• 8 reviews contain no text at all — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Several reviews from the June 2024 and June 2023 date clusters share the same date (2024-06-09 and 2023-06-10), which may indicate batch submissions or platform import artifacts. Language across these reviews is varied enough to not suggest fabrication, but the date clustering is worth noting.
• One review (2023-12-18) contains a near-exact duplicate of its own text within the same review body, suggesting a copy-paste error by the reviewer rather than a fake review.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with only one 1-star review. While this could reflect genuine quality, it warrants mild caution. However, the specificity and variety of detail across reviews reduces the likelihood of systematic fake review inflation.
• Recency note: The majority of reviews with substantive text span 2019–2025, with strong representation in the past 12 months (2024–2025), supporting continued reliability of the score.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and chronologically diverse review set with high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — tempered only slightly by the presence of blank reviews and a mild date-clustering anomaly.

Matthews Plumbing (operating also as A&D Total Plumbing) has an overwhelmingly positive review record across a large volume of reviews spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the strongest and most frequently cited dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and courteous behavior. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and often lower than competing quotes, with multiple reviewers noting that final costs matched or came in under the original estimate. Project completion scores are strong but carry a slight deduction due to one negative review citing a missed diagnosis of a broken sewer pipe (the smelly basement incident) and one 1-star review citing three days of unanswered calls, indicating occasional responsiveness failures. Experience is well-supported by specific accounts of skilled diagnostics, problem-solving under difficult conditions, and quality workmanship across a wide variety of plumbing tasks.

• 3 reviews contained no text (rating only) and were excluded from dimensional scoring — these blank reviews inflate the star average without providing usable data.
• All reviews are 5-star with the exception of one 3-star and one 1-star review. The overwhelming uniformity of 5-star ratings warrants mild fake review scrutiny, though the reviews are largely specific, detailed, and varied in language, reducing this concern significantly.
• Some reviews reference 'A&D Total Plumbing' and staff members 'Brandon,' 'Tony,' and 'Debbie' rather than 'Matthews Plumbing' and 'Matt' — this appears to be the same family business operating under two names or a rebranded entity. Scores have been calculated across all reviews as a unified business profile.
• A notable portion of reviews (roughly 30+) are dated prior to 2022, with many from 2011–2017. While these older reviews are consistent in tone and quality, they carry reduced weight per recency rules. The more recent reviews (2024–2025) remain strongly positive and directionally consistent.
• One 1-star review (2016) explicitly states the company did not return calls over three days during an emergency — this is a direct professionalism and project completion concern and has been factored into scoring.
• One 3-star review (2017) describes a missed diagnosis of a broken sewer pipe after the team dismissed a smelly basement as 'no big deal' — this is a meaningful experience and project completion flag and has been factored into scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and multi-year review dataset with high mention counts across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — however, users should note the recency skew toward older reviews and two specific negative incidents that suggest occasional lapses in responsiveness and diagnostic accuracy.

All Rooter, led primarily by Bert, earns consistently strong marks across all four dimensions based on an extensive and detailed review base spanning 2016 to 2024. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, courteous attitude, and transparency throughout the service process. Project completion scores are also very high, with reviewers repeatedly noting that jobs were finished thoroughly, callbacks were honored, and complex or multi-phase work was seen through to completion without abandonment. Experience and technical skill are strongly validated by multiple accounts of Bert solving problems that other plumbers could not, using camera diagnostics, hydro jetting, and creative problem-solving on difficult jobs. Pricing is rated positively by a large number of reviewers who describe fair quotes, competitive rates, no hidden charges, and in several cases Bert charging less than quoted or nothing at all for minor issues — though one reviewer noted an initially high estimate that required negotiation, preventing a perfect score in this dimension.

• One 1-star review (dated 2021-03-04) cites a failure to respond to a question, indicating a responsiveness lapse. The business replied but the reviewer disputed the response, suggesting a genuine communication breakdown. This was factored into the professionalism score.
• One 4-star review (dated 2018-10-15) noted a missed appointment window and an initially high estimate, both of which were factored into scoring.
• The overwhelming volume of 5-star reviews with highly specific, detailed narratives, named technicians, and varied job types is consistent with authentic reviews rather than fake ones. No significant fake review patterns detected.
• The majority of reviews reference Bert by name, suggesting heavy reliance on a single technician. A few reviews mention Luis and Juan. Business continuity and consistency of quality if Bert is unavailable cannot be fully assessed from this review set.
• Recency note: Approximately 15 reviews are from 2024 or 2023, providing a solid recent signal. The bulk of reviews span 2017–2022. No significant quality degradation trend detected across time periods.

This WW Score is highly reliable, based on 75 reviews with rich, specific detail across all four scored dimensions, a strong recency signal, no detected fake review patterns, and consistent performance narratives spanning nearly a decade of service history.