Find Nearby Plumbers In Chicago, Illinois

Charlie demonstrates strong professionalism with exceptional responsiveness and communication across 48 reviews, earning 87.5/100. His technical expertise and problem-solving ability are consistently praised across 35 reviews (88.0/100). Project completion is solid at 79.5/100 based on 45 mentions, though a handful of reviews cite communication delays and one instance of avoidance on follow-up projects. Pricing is fair and competitive at 82.0/100 across 22 mentions, with customers frequently noting value relative to competitors. The WW Score of 82.1 reflects a highly reliable, experienced contractor with minor responsiveness gaps during peak periods.

• Four reviews (2023-06-02, 2017-08-04, 2017-02-16, 2016-04-07) explicitly cite failure to return calls or respond to voicemails, suggesting a recurring communication weakness during certain periods
• One 2014-12-28 review describes deliberate avoidance ('putting me off') on a multi-project inquiry, indicating possible capacity management issues or selective client acceptance
• One 2014-06-06 review disputes pricing as 'RIDICULOUS' and 'EXCESSIVE' for a faucet replacement, contrasting sharply with the overwhelming majority of positive pricing feedback
• Review dates span 2013-2023 with heavy concentration in 2013-2014 (40+ reviews); only 3 reviews from 2022-2023, limiting recency assessment of current service quality
• No evidence of fake reviews detected; language is varied, specific, and contextual across all reviews

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable given the large sample size (60 reviews) and strong confidence across all four dimensions. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that responsiveness issues appear episodic (concentrated in 2016-2017) and may reflect past capacity constraints rather than current operations; recent reviews (2022-2023) show no communication complaints. The contractor's technical competence and pricing fairness are exceptionally well-supported by evidence.

Elk Grove Village Sewer & Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strengths in professionalism and technical expertise. The company excels at responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous service, with numerous reviews praising specific technicians like Joe, Armando, and Ryan. Project completion is generally reliable with most jobs finished as promised, though a few callbacks and scheduling issues were noted. Pricing is perceived as fair and competitive by most customers, though some reviews indicate occasional overquoting or aggressive sales tactics. The company's main vulnerabilities are inconsistent follow-through on callbacks and rare instances of unprofessional behavior from individual technicians.

• Two reviews (2024-11-02 and 2023-06-10) report aggressive driving behavior by company vehicles, suggesting potential employee conduct issues unrelated to plumbing work.
• Multiple negative reviews (2021-12-02, 2021-06-10, 2020-05-14, 2020-05-13) document serious project completion failures including abandoned work, no-shows on scheduled callbacks, and incomplete repairs requiring multiple follow-up visits.
• Pricing concerns appear in several reviews: one customer (2024-02-08) reported $600 quote vs. $250 competitor price for same service; another (2021-12-02) claims overquoting by $560 on a kitchen sink job that was completed by competitor for $400 total.
• One review (2018-09-13) describes a plumber becoming angry and yelling at customer, suggesting occasional interpersonal professionalism issues.
• Two reviews (2022-08-25, 2023-03-17) report overbooking and failure to prioritize scheduled appointments, leaving customers with conflicting contractor schedules.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected; reviews show varied experiences with specific details and legitimate complaints mixed with praise.
• Recency note: Most recent reviews (past 12 months) are predominantly 5-star with high satisfaction; older reviews (2013-2021) show more variability and serious complaints, suggesting possible recent service improvements.

This WW Score of 81.2 is reliable and should be trusted as a fair assessment. The score is based on 118 usable reviews with strong data across all dimensions (HIGH confidence for three dimensions, MODERATE for pricing). The company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and expertise but has documented weaknesses in project completion follow-through and occasional pricing transparency issues. Recent reviews suggest improvement, but historical patterns of callback failures and scheduling problems warrant caution for time-sensitive projects.

S&J Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 81.2, driven primarily by exceptional professionalism (87.5) and solid project completion (85.0). The company excels in punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and technical skill, with 89 reviews explicitly praising professional conduct and 76 reviews confirming reliable job completion. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (72.0), with multiple customers reporting costs significantly higher than market rates—some paying 2-3x competitor quotes for similar work. While most recent reviews (June 2025) are uniformly positive, older reviews from 2020-2024 reveal occasional service failures and interpersonal issues that slightly temper confidence.

• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple explicit complaints about overcharging. One customer paid 2-3x market rate for a spigot repair; another paid $400 for work others quoted at $300. This pattern suggests systematic pricing above market value despite quality work.
• RECENCY BIAS DETECTED: 40+ reviews from June 2025 (within past 2 weeks) are uniformly 5-star with minimal detail, contrasting sharply with 2020-2024 reviews which show more variance and critical feedback. This clustering warrants caution regarding potential review manipulation or seasonal bias.
• SERVICE RELIABILITY GAPS: Two 1-star reviews document serious failures: (1) technician failed to show after customer missed doorbell, refused to reschedule; (2) technician called 3 hours into 4-hour service window to cancel. These incidents, though rare, indicate inconsistent operational standards.
• INTERPERSONAL ISSUES: One 2-star review documents condescending behavior toward elderly customers ('read the manual' response to reasonable questions). One 3-star review documents installation errors (mismatched handles) and property damage (wall scraping) not disclosed to customer.
• GENERIC REVIEWS: Approximately 8-10 reviews contain only 1-3 words ('Great work today', 'Very professional', 'it went very good') or are estimate-only entries with no substantive data. These provide minimal analytical value.
• CONFIDENCE MODERATION: Despite HIGH overall confidence, the pricing dimension is based on only 28 mentions (MODERATE confidence), and recent review clustering suggests some caution is warranted in interpreting the most recent data.

This WW Score of 81.2 is reliable for assessing professionalism and project completion (both HIGH confidence with 76+ mentions each), but should be interpreted cautiously regarding pricing due to limited mentions (28) and explicit customer complaints of systematic overcharging relative to market rates. The recent clustering of uniformly positive reviews warrants treating the most recent data with moderate skepticism; the 2020-2024 review history provides more balanced perspective. Overall, S&J Plumbing delivers quality work and professional service but at above-market pricing, making it a premium-cost provider rather than a value option.

Tim Stefl Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism (82.5) and technical experience (85.0). The company excels at communication, punctuality, and skilled workmanship, as evidenced by numerous detailed positive reviews praising staff courtesy, responsiveness, and quality work. However, project completion scores are tempered by multiple documented instances of missed appointments, failure to follow through on agreed work, and poor callback responsiveness. Pricing is fair and transparent (80.0), though one customer expressed concern about value relative to trainee involvement. The company's reputation is built on consistent positive service delivery, but reliability issues in scheduling and follow-through prevent a higher overall score.

• RECENCY CONCERN: 17 of 41 reviews (41%) are older than 5 years (pre-2019). Most recent reviews (2023) show mixed signals—strong positive service but one critical 1-star for rude customer service on initial phone contact.
• PATTERN OF RESPONSIVENESS FAILURES: Multiple reviews (2020, 2019, 2015) document Tim Stefl not returning calls after initial service, failing to follow up on quotes, and not showing up to scheduled appointments without notice. This is a recurring theme across different time periods.
• INCOMPLETE PROJECT DELIVERY: One detailed 1-star review (2019) describes a complex job where agreed-upon work was not completed, radiator was not reconnected properly, and the owner was not called back afterward.
• SCHEDULING RELIABILITY: One 1-star review (2015) documents three separate instances of no-shows or last-minute cancellations without proper notification.
• CUSTOMER SERVICE TONE: One 1-star review (2023) reports rude and unwelcoming phone manner from office staff during initial quote inquiry.
• INCOMPLETE WORK QUALITY: One 2-star review (2022) notes that while the primary issue was fixed, the toilet did not completely flush and required customer intervention to resolve.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews show genuine variation in detail, specific names, dates, and both positive and negative experiences. Language is natural and contextual.

This WW Score of 81.2 is reliable for understanding the company's typical service quality, but should be interpreted with caution: while the majority of reviews (32 of 41, or 78%) are 5-star ratings reflecting genuine satisfaction with workmanship and initial responsiveness, a consistent minority pattern (4 documented 1-star and 2-star reviews spanning 2015–2023) reveals systemic issues with appointment reliability, callback responsiveness, and follow-through on complex projects that are not reflected in the overall score and should weigh heavily in decision-making for customers requiring guaranteed scheduling or multi-phase work.

JSR Plumbing demonstrates strong technical competence and generally reliable service, with most customers praising punctuality, professionalism, and quality workmanship. However, significant customer service inconsistencies emerge in recent reviews (2024, 2019), particularly around communication follow-up, responsiveness to texts, and administrative professionalism (receipt provision). Pricing is generally viewed as fair to reasonable, though one 2024 review flagged the service as 'very expensive.' The contractor excels at problem-solving and emergency response but shows a pattern of poor follow-through on non-emergency commitments and post-service communication.

• RECENCY CONCERN: Two recent negative reviews (2024-07-25 and 2019-02-02) describe serious communication failures and unresponsiveness, suggesting ongoing systemic issues with follow-up and customer service that contradict the overwhelmingly positive older reviews.
• COMMUNICATION PATTERN: Multiple reviews mention Jeff 'only texts, does not answer phone calls' and fails to respond to messages or honor commitments to send receipts/follow-up information. This is a recurring theme in negative reviews.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: The 2024 review explicitly states 'Quality of work was good. Quality of customer service = dismal,' indicating a disconnect between technical competence and business professionalism.
• POTENTIAL REVIEW AGE BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2018 or earlier. Recent reviews (2024, 2019) are significantly more critical, suggesting service quality or customer service may have declined over time.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: Several reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('excellent, honest, reliable,' 'professional, punctual,' 'highly recommend') and lack specific details. However, the presence of detailed negative reviews and specific technical descriptions in positive reviews suggests these are likely genuine rather than fabricated.

This score should be treated with CAUTION. While technical competence appears genuinely high (HIGH confidence), the professionalism and project completion scores are significantly undermined by recent evidence of poor communication, unresponsiveness, and failure to honor follow-up commitments. The WW Score of 81.2 reflects strong technical work but masks serious customer service deficiencies that have emerged in the past 12 months. Customers should expect quality workmanship but should not rely on responsive communication or timely administrative follow-up.

ANM Sewer scores strongly across all four dimensions based on a small but consistently positive set of reviews. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with all four reviewers explicitly praising responsiveness, communication, and customer-first attitude — including texted updates, photos, and videos of completed work. Pricing received favorable mentions in three reviews, with one reviewer noting ANM provided the most fair quote among six plumbers contacted and another confirming the final bill matched the estimate. Project completion was noted positively in three reviews, covering a complex sewer repair with city permitting, a multi-valve replacement, and a drain fix — all described as fully completed. Experience is supported by three reviews referencing correct diagnosis, problem-solving under unforeseen conditions, and quality workmanship. Scores are tempered by the small review pool, which limits statistical confidence.

• Only 4 reviews analyzed — WW Score should be treated as preliminary and revisited as more reviews accumulate.
• All 4 reviews are 5-star ratings. While the review content is sufficiently specific and varied to suggest authenticity, the absence of any critical feedback means weaknesses cannot be assessed.
• No reviews older than 12 months — all reviews fall within the October–November 2024 window, which is a positive recency signal but also a very narrow time window.
• No fake review patterns detected — each review contains specific details (permit process, valve counts, drain types, weekend communication) that suggest genuine customer experiences.

This WW Score carries MODERATE reliability due to a small but specific and recently dated review set; the score is directionally trustworthy but should be revisited once at least 10 or more reviews are available.