Find Nearby Plumbers In Chicago, Illinois

Stephens Plumbing & Heating demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength with 89 mentions highlighting punctuality, friendly demeanor, communication, and responsiveness. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 71 mentions, with customers consistently praising knowledgeable technicians and quality workmanship. Project completion shows solid execution with 68 mentions of jobs finished properly and on time. Pricing receives moderate support (42 mentions) with most customers finding rates fair and reasonable, though some isolated complaints about premium pricing and warranty limitations exist. The company benefits from long-term customer loyalty and strong reputation, though a small number of negative reviews reveal occasional service inconsistencies and communication lapses.

• Two identical reviews detected (dated 2025-05-26 and 2025-05-23) with identical text about 'John' and A/C service—suggests possible duplicate submission or review manipulation.
• Multiple empty/blank reviews present (at least 10 reviews with 5.0 rating but no text)—these were excluded from scoring as they provide no usable data.
• Negative reviews cluster around specific issues: (1) Front desk/phone staff rudeness mentioned in 4+ reviews; (2) Warranty/follow-up failures on sewer rodding (2 reviews); (3) Estimate delays and poor communication on large projects (3 reviews); (4) Occasional technician attitude problems noted in 3+ reviews.
• Recency bias noted: Majority of reviews are from 2024-2025 (past 12 months), with older reviews (2010-2018) showing similar patterns of high satisfaction, suggesting consistent long-term performance.
• One review (2024-06-06, 2-star) explicitly notes company waived bill after 3-month delay in recognizing error—indicates accountability but also process failures.
• Pricing complaints are isolated but specific: one customer cited triple markup on parts (2021), another noted $99 diagnostic fee perceived as excessive (2024).

This WW Score of 82.3 is highly reliable, based on 152 reviews with strong data across all four dimensions and HIGH confidence in three of four categories. The company demonstrates consistent professionalism and technical expertise over a 15-year review history, though isolated but recurring issues with front-desk communication and occasional project management lapses warrant caution. The score accurately reflects a solid, trustworthy contractor with minor operational inconsistencies.

Chicago Sewer & Drain Professionals demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength with 98 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous behavior. Project completion is solid with 89 mentions showing reliable follow-through and timely work, though some callbacks and scheduling issues were noted. Experience scores well with 67 mentions of technical skill and problem-solving ability. Pricing is the weakest dimension with 32 mentions; while many customers praise fair pricing, several reviews explicitly cite overcharging, upselling, and non-competitive quotes compared to other plumbers.

• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple reviews from 2024-06-09 with identical or near-identical phrasing and all 5-star ratings suggest possible review manipulation. These include generic praise without specific details about the work performed.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple customers report being overcharged or quoted higher than competitors for similar work. One detailed 2022 review documents $2000+ in unnecessary charges. Another 2022 review notes $350-$417 for faucet replacement on high end of market rate, plus $600 quote for work another plumber charged $50 for.
• NO-SHOW/COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Five reviews (2024-10-01, 2023-06-10, 2022-10-07, 2020-06-10, and one undated) report no-shows, failure to respond to calls/emails, or broken appointment commitments. These represent clear professionalism lapses.
• QUALITY CONTROL CONCERN: One detailed 2023 review documents poor workmanship on a $4500 sewer pipe replacement with misaligned connections, obscured photos, poor backfill work, and alleged employee theft. This is a significant red flag for project completion quality.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2020-2025, with heavy concentration in 2021-2024. Recent negative reviews (2024-10-01, 2023-12-14, 2023-06-10) suggest ongoing issues despite generally positive historical pattern.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Several reviews contain no text or only 1-2 words, reducing data quality for analysis.

This WW Score of 82.3 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence overall, but with important caveats: the professionalism and project completion scores are reliable given high mention counts, but the pricing score is conservative and based on limited explicit mentions despite clear patterns of customer dissatisfaction. The suspected fake reviews from 2024-06-09 and documented quality/communication failures in recent years suggest the company's actual current performance may be lower than historical averages indicate. Customers should be aware of pricing risks and verify appointment confirmations.

Go-Rooter demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism (88.5) driven by consistent praise for responsiveness, punctuality, politeness, and professional demeanor across 68 reviews. Project completion scores well at 85.1 based on 62 mentions of timely job completion and follow-through, though two negative reviews cite delayed callbacks on emergency calls. Experience is solid at 84.7 with 48 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. Pricing is the weakest dimension at 79.2 with 32 mentions—while most reviews praise fair pricing and transparency, two detailed complaints about high labor charges ($300+ for cartridge replacement, $180 emergency fee) create meaningful drag. The company excels in emergency response and customer communication but shows occasional inconsistency in 24-hour emergency availability.

• Two negative reviews (2022-10-07 rating 1.0 and 2021-09-24 rating 1.0) cite poor emergency response and excessive labor pricing; these are credible complaints with specific details and should not be dismissed
• One additional negative review (2019-01-30 rating 2.0) documents 3-hour callback delay on emergency call, suggesting inconsistent emergency response despite many positive emergency reviews
• Pricing dimension shows polarization: majority of reviews praise 'fair' and 'reasonable' pricing, but two detailed complaints about labor costs suggest pricing may be high relative to market for certain service types
• Most reviews are from 2017-2019 (approximately 50+ reviews); only ~15 reviews from past 12 months (2024-2023). Recency is limited, which may not reflect current operations
• No evidence of fake reviews detected; reviews show specific details, varied language, and credible negative feedback mixed with positive, suggesting authentic customer base

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable and should be trusted. It is based on 75 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (32-68 mentions per dimension), HIGH confidence in three of four dimensions, and includes credible negative feedback that prevents artificial inflation. However, the age of most reviews (2017-2019) means current performance may differ; recent reviews (2023-2024) remain positive but are limited in number. The score reflects a solid, professional plumbing company with strong emergency response and communication, but with documented pricing concerns and occasional inconsistency in emergency availability.

HT Strenger demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently punctual, courteous, and responsive service across 48 reviews. Technical expertise and problem-solving ability are well-documented across 32 reviews, with plumbers frequently praised for diagnostic skills and efficient work. Project completion is solid with 35 mentions of finished jobs and follow-through, though one significant failure (sewer line not fixed) and one incomplete estimate callback reduce this score. Pricing is the weakest dimension with only 8 mentions; while some reviews praise fair pricing, three detailed complaints about inflated billing (15-minute increment charges, unnecessary upsells, high costs for partial work) create meaningful concern about value consistency.

• Pricing concerns flagged in 3 reviews (2017, 2016, 2023) citing inflated time billing, unnecessary work recommendations, and high costs relative to work completed. This pattern suggests potential systematic pricing practices that may not align with customer expectations.
• One critical service failure: January 2025 review documents incomplete sewer line rodding ($800 paid, issue unresolved), missing camera equipment, unprofessional behavior (employee vaping), and no warranty offered. This is the only 1-star review and represents a significant departure from otherwise consistent quality.
• One incomplete follow-up: August 2017 review documents failure to provide estimate callback without customer re-initiation, suggesting occasional communication lapses.
• Review cluster from June 9, 2024 contains 15 reviews with similar positive phrasing and all 5-star ratings. While not definitively fake, the concentration and generic praise language warrants slight confidence reduction. However, reviews span multiple years and include specific details, mitigating fake review risk.
• Most reviews (47 of 60) are from 2024 or later, providing strong recency. Older reviews (2012-2019) are consistent in tone and quality, reducing temporal bias concerns.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence due to large sample size (59 usable reviews) and strong data across three dimensions. However, the pricing dimension is based on only 8 mentions and shows conflicting signals (some fair pricing praise vs. three detailed billing complaints), suggesting actual pricing experience may vary significantly by job type. The January 2025 service failure and pricing concerns prevent a higher score despite otherwise excellent professionalism and experience ratings. Customers should expect strong technical service but should clarify pricing structure and warranty terms upfront.

Garrity Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in project completion (87.0) and technical expertise (88.0). Professionalism scores well at 85.0, with consistent mentions of punctuality, courtesy, and responsiveness across 28 reviews. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (72.5), with multiple detailed complaints about billing practices, assistant charges, and quotes exceeding estimates. The company shows genuine skill and follow-through on work quality, but pricing transparency and fairness concerns temper the otherwise positive assessment.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Four detailed negative reviews (2016, 2014, 2013, 2010) specifically allege overcharging, inflated assistant fees, and misleading hourly rates. These are substantive complaints with specific dollar amounts and scenarios, not generic criticism.
• BILLING PRACTICE PATTERN: Multiple reviewers report being charged for two assistants when only one worked, or charged for full hours when work took minutes. This suggests a systematic billing practice that may not align with stated hourly rates.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most reviews (40+ of 54) are from 2018 or earlier. Only 3 reviews from 2024-2025. Recent pricing complaints are from 2016 and earlier, but the pattern is consistent enough to warrant caution.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 3 reviews contain only 5-star ratings with no text (2024-08-13, 2023-06-10, 2016-06-11, 2017-06-11). These provide no usable data and suggest possible automated or placeholder entries.
• OUTLIER REVIEW: One review (2019-06-11) appears to be from a neighbor who parks near the business and is not a customer—flagged as non-relevant but included in count.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: While most reviews contain specific details and vary in language, the overwhelming concentration of 5-star ratings (50 of 54) with minimal critical detail is atypical. However, the four 1-2 star reviews are highly detailed and credible, suggesting the dataset is not entirely fabricated. The positive reviews do vary in specifics and mention different team members (Tom, Larry, Brian, Tristan, Nico), which adds authenticity.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable for assessing technical competence and responsiveness, but should be treated with caution regarding pricing fairness—the pricing dimension is dragged down by credible, detailed complaints about billing practices that appear to be systematic rather than isolated incidents. Customers should expect quality work but should obtain detailed written estimates and clarify all labor charges before engaging the company.

Terry's Neighborhood Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with rapid response times (often under 1 hour), courteous communication, and respectful demeanor. Project completion is reliable with jobs finished on time and follow-through on commitments. Experience is evident through skilled diagnostics, problem-solving ability, and technical knowledge. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though one reviewer noted a $300 toilet installation felt high. Two negative reviews from 2014 and 2023 reflect poor phone service and dismissive customer interactions regarding services outside their scope, which moderately impact the overall score.

• Two negative reviews (ratings 1.0 and 2.0) involve poor phone communication and dismissive service when inquiring about services outside their scope (backflow preventers, drains). These suggest inconsistent customer service standards in initial contact.
• Most reviews are older than 5 years (13 of 20 reviews predate 2018). Only 3 reviews are from 2023-2024. Recency is limited, which may not reflect current service levels.
• One reviewer (2018) explicitly noted high pricing ($300 for toilet installation), though acknowledged efficiency. This contrasts with multiple other reviews praising affordability, suggesting pricing may vary by service type.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews contain specific details, varied language, and realistic scenarios with both positive and negative examples.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable based on 20 reviews with HIGH confidence across all dimensions, though the score should be weighted toward older data (pre-2018) and may not fully reflect current operations given limited recent reviews.