Michels Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and experience, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, courteous technicians, and high-quality workmanship across a wide variety of jobs spanning many years. The most consistent drag on the overall score is pricing: a notable and recurring thread across multiple independent reviews — ...
Read more Score Narrative
Michels Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and experience, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, courteous technicians, and high-quality workmanship across a wide variety of jobs spanning many years. The most consistent drag on the overall score is pricing: a notable and recurring thread across multiple independent reviews — spanning from 2008 through 2025 — describes the company as expensive or pricey, with two negative reviews specifically citing billing concerns including a charge perceived as excessive and a complaint about nickel-and-diming without a written estimate. Project completion is generally strong, though one negative review alleged a technician caused electrical damage and concealed it, and another cited poor follow-through on a customer complaint letter. The long tenure of the business and repeat-customer loyalty across 10–20+ year relationships lend credibility to the positive signals, but the pricing dimension meaningfully suppresses the WW Score.
Flags & Warnings
• 10 reviews contain no text whatsoever (blank or single-punctuation entries) and were excluded from dimension scoring; their star ratings were noted but provide no usable qualitative data.
• Several reviews use very similar phrasing around outdoor hose bib replacement and Bryan/Bryan's name — two reviews (April 2024 and June 2024) appear nearly identical in content and structure, describing the same job type, same technician, and same inline turnoff recommendation. These may represent duplicate or coached reviews and were treated with caution.
• The review corpus spans 2007–2025, meaning a significant portion of reviews are more than 5 years old. Recency weighting was applied; reviews from 2024–2025 were given higher weight in scoring.
• One 1-star review (January 2020) alleges a technician caused electrical damage and concealed it from the customer, and that management (Matt) took no ownership. This is a serious workmanship and customer service flag.
• One 1-star review (May 2019) warns explicitly to get a written estimate due to unexpected charges. One 1-star review (March 2013) describes a $131 charge for under 10 minutes of work as excessive. These pricing complaints are independent and span multiple years, lending credibility to the pricing concern.
• One 1-star review (June 2014) describes a technician scratching a sink, removing an old faucet without permission, and the company ignoring a written complaint letter — a customer service and accountability concern.
• One 1-star review (June 2016) cites a rude interaction regarding a billing policy change, though this is an isolated complaint about policy rather than workmanship.
Reliability Statement
This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year review set with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, making it statistically reliable; however, the recurring independent pricing complaints and at least one serious workmanship-concealment allegation introduce meaningful uncertainty, and prospective customers should request written estimates and verify current practices before engaging.
Read less