Tangney & Sons demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism (86.0) and technical experience (88.0), supported by 14 and 11 mentions respectively across reviews. Project completion scores solidly at 84.0 with 13 mentions, though two significant negative reviews document unresolved callback issues and incomplete work. Pricing presents the weakest dimension at ...
Read more Score Narrative
Tangney & Sons demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strengths in professionalism (86.0) and technical experience (88.0), supported by 14 and 11 mentions respectively across reviews. Project completion scores solidly at 84.0 with 13 mentions, though two significant negative reviews document unresolved callback issues and incomplete work. Pricing presents the weakest dimension at 73.0 with 9 mentions; while many reviews praise fair pricing, three reviews explicitly cite overcharging, high emergency fees, and unclear payment policies. The company shows excellent responsiveness and skill but has documented accountability gaps in follow-through on promised corrections.
Flags & Warnings
• Two 1-star reviews (2023-05-15 and 2015-01-27) and one 2-star review (2014-04-05) document serious issues: unfinished work with owner non-responsiveness, leaking installations with high repair charges, and poor communication on payment policies and appointment cancellations. These are specific, detailed complaints that contradict the predominantly positive narrative.
• Pricing dimension shows conflicting signals: many reviews praise 'fair' and 'reasonable' rates, but three reviews cite overpricing ($650 for a valve fix, $400 for toilet work, unclear ceiling-removal charges). This suggests pricing may vary significantly by job type or technician.
• Most reviews are older than 2 years (15 of 21 reviews predate 2023). Only 2 reviews from past 12 months; recency is limited. The most recent negative review (2023-05-15) is particularly concerning as it suggests ongoing accountability issues.
• Multiple reviews mention different technicians by name (Mike, Joe, Shannon), making it difficult to assess whether quality issues are company-wide or technician-specific.
Reliability Statement
This score should be treated with moderate caution: while the company demonstrates genuine technical competence and professionalism in the majority of cases, the presence of unresolved callback failures and pricing inconsistencies documented in recent reviews indicates real operational gaps that are not reflected in the overall score. The HIGH confidence is driven by volume of mentions, but the recency bias toward older reviews and the severity of documented follow-through failures suggest the true current performance may be lower than 82.1.
Read less