Find Nearby Plumbers In Meridian, Idaho

Both reviews are positive and suggest a capable, friendly contractor who completes work on budget and on time. Professionalism is supported by mentions of friendliness and communication across both reviews, while experience is loosely supported by references to being knowledgeable and versatile. Pricing and project completion are each mentioned in only one review, making those scores particularly tentative. All reviews are from 2020, meaning no data exists from the past 12 months, which further limits reliability.

• Only 2 reviews total — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Both reviews are over 3 years old (dated 2020) — no recent data available to reflect current performance.
• Both reviews are 5-star with limited specifics — while not conclusively fake, the generic praise and small sample size prevent high confidence.
• Phrases like 'jack of all trades' and 'can fix anything' are vague and non-specific, reducing evidentiary weight.

This score should be treated as highly unreliable due to the critically small sample size of only 2 reviews, both of which are outdated and lack the specific detail needed to confidently assess any dimension.

Only one review is available for analysis, which is insufficient to calculate a reliable WW Score. The single review praises professionalism (respectful, courteous, friendly, hard-working) and mentions same-day service completion. However, with only one data point and no information on pricing or technical experience, confidence in any aggregate score is critically low. The review is from 2020, over 3 years old, which further limits its relevance.

• Insufficient review volume: only 1 review analyzed. WW Score cannot be calculated reliably.
• Review is from October 2020 — over 3 years old. Does not reflect current service quality.
• No pricing information provided in review.
• No explicit mention of technical skill or experience level.
• Rating of 4.0 (not 5.0) suggests some reservation, but reason not stated.

This analysis cannot produce a trustworthy WW Score due to insufficient data (fewer than 3 reviews). A minimum of 3 reviews is required to assess contractor quality reliably.

This single review paints a strongly positive picture across all four dimensions. The reviewer explicitly praised punctuality, professionalism, friendliness, and cleanup — all hallmarks of strong professionalism. Pricing was noted as reasonable with a senior discount offered, suggesting fair and transparent pricing practices. Project completion was affirmed through statements like 'they came out and did what they said they were going to do' and 'stuck to the job.' The reviewer's background as a plumbing intern lends some credibility to their assessment of workmanship quality, though only one data point exists. All scores are conservative due to the extremely limited sample size.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Review is dated 2014-05-08, making it over 10 years old. This data is significantly outdated and should be weighted very low relative to recent reviews.
• With only one review, no pattern analysis for fake review detection is possible. The review does contain specific details (senior discount, intern background, cleanup behavior) which are positive authenticity signals, but cannot be confirmed without additional reviews.

This score carries very low reliability — it is based on a single review that is over a decade old, making it insufficient to draw any meaningful conclusions about current service quality.

Only one review is available for analysis, which is insufficient to produce a reliable WW Score. That single review speaks positively about Travis Baker's professionalism, noting he was understanding, thoughtful, and considerate during delays caused by city sewer work. Project completion is supported by the mention that drain lines were replumbed and the customer was kept functional throughout, though no explicit timeline or delivery detail was provided. Workmanship quality is referenced briefly as 'excellent,' lending a modest experience score. Pricing was not mentioned at all and cannot be scored.

• Only 1 review analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• All dimension scores are based on a single mention and carry LIMITED confidence only.
• Review is dated October 2020, making it over 4 years old. Recency weighting is a concern — this may not reflect current service quality.
• No pricing or value information was mentioned in any review — Pricing dimension has NO DATA.
• With only one review, fake review detection is not applicable, but the review is specific and detailed enough to appear genuine.

This score report is based on a single review from 2020 and should not be considered a reliable indicator of this contractor's current or consistent performance.