Find Nearby Plumbers Companies In 83813, Kellogg, Idaho

The majority of recent reviews (2025) for Wizard Plumbing are strongly positive, praising punctuality, communication, and courteous technicians, which drives the professionalism score upward. However, the dataset is a mixed-entity set containing reviews for both Wizard Plumbing and Bennett Plumbing, with Bennett reviews spanning 2003–2023 and including several serious complaints about overcharging, abandoned work, poor workmanship, and unresponsiveness. Pricing is a notable weak point: multiple reviewers across both entities flagged high or non-transparent costs, and one reviewer described a bait-and-switch from a $60 promotional price toward an $8,000 estimate. Project completion is significantly dragged down by credible accounts of incomplete work, recurring clogs after service, a technician who left a job site without finishing, and a plumber who caused damage requiring a second contractor to repair. Experience scores moderately well due to many specific mentions of knowledgeable technicians, but is tempered by documented cases of misdiagnosis and failed repairs.

• MIXED ENTITY WARNING: This review set appears to contain reviews for two distinct businesses — Wizard Plumbing and Drain (recent reviews, 2025) and Bennett Plumbing (older reviews, 2003–2023). These should not be scored together as a single contractor profile. The WW Score reflects the blended dataset but may not accurately represent either business individually.
• RECENCY IMBALANCE: The majority of Wizard Plumbing reviews are from 2025 and are overwhelmingly positive. Bennett Plumbing reviews span 2003–2023 and contain most of the negative feedback. Older reviews (pre-2024) should be weighted less, but the negative signals they carry are substantive and cannot be ignored.
• POSSIBLE FAKE REVIEW PATTERN — WIZARD PLUMBING: Several April 10, 2025 reviews reference the same technician (Jonathan) for tankless water heater installations with nearly identical structure, phrasing, and outcomes posted on the same date. This clustering is suspicious and may indicate review manipulation. Confidence in the Wizard Plumbing subset is reduced accordingly.
• BLANK REVIEWS: 8 reviews contained no text (rating only). These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• SERIOUS COMPLETION FAILURES DOCUMENTED: One review describes a technician leaving mid-job without fixing leaks and the owner refusing to send another plumber. Another describes a clog recurring within two weeks, three failed reschedules, an abandoned camera inspection promise, and a multi-thousand dollar upsell that a second plumber resolved for $500. These are credible, detailed accounts that materially lower the project completion score.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS ACROSS BOTH ENTITIES: Multiple reviewers noted prices as high or pricy. One reviewer was charged $300 for a diagnosis without being told the rate upfront. Another was overcharged by $500 relative to the original quote. One reviewer explicitly said they would negotiate on price. These are consistent signals of pricing transparency issues.
• WORKMANSHIP FAILURE — BENNETT: One review describes plumbing work that failed years later at significant cost. Another describes a technician who caused damage that required a second plumber to fix. A third describes toilets not resealed or caulked after wax ring replacement, with the original leak still present.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-limited reliability due to the mixing of two distinct business entities across a 20-year date range, a suspicious clustering of same-day reviews for Wizard Plumbing that may indicate review manipulation, and a meaningful number of detailed negative reviews describing incomplete work, pricing issues, and workmanship failures that substantively offset the volume of generic positive feedback.