Find Nearby Plumbers In Boise City, Idaho

Only 2 reviews were analyzed, both from over 4 years ago (2017 and 2020), and neither describes actual contracted work. Both reviews document unprofessional behavior in non-work contexts: one describes an angry voicemail response to a wrong number, and the other describes aggressive driving behavior. No data exists regarding pricing, project completion, or technical experience. A WW Score cannot be reliably calculated from these reviews alone.

• Insufficient review volume (n=2) — cannot calculate reliable WW Score
• Both reviews are older than 4 years; no recent data available
• Neither review involves actual contracted work or service delivery
• Reviews document personal conduct issues rather than professional service quality
• No evidence of pricing practices, project completion, or technical skill

This score is unreliable and should not be used for decision-making. At least 3 reviews describing actual contracted work are required to produce a trustworthy WW Score.

Both reviews are positive and describe completed multi-scope plumbing projects, including faucet and disposal installation, tub and shower remodeling, water main replacement, well pump installation, and sprinkler line upgrades. Project completion is well-supported, as both reviewers describe jobs that were seen through to the end with no mention of abandoned or incomplete work. Experience is evidenced by the technical breadth of work described — particularly the water main diagnosis and full replacement with routing improvements. Professionalism is lightly supported by phrases like 'honest and thorough' and 'Class A service,' though no specific detail on punctuality, communication, or appearance is provided. Pricing is entirely absent from both reviews, so no score can be assigned to that dimension.

• Only 2 reviews analyzed — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Both reviews are dated in early 2019, making them over 5 years old. Recency is a significant concern — contractor quality and reliability may have changed substantially since then.
• No pricing information mentioned in any review — the Pricing dimension has been scored null.
• Sample size is too small to detect fake review patterns definitively, but both reviews contain specific project details which reduces fake review suspicion.

This score report is based on only 2 reviews, both from 2019, which is insufficient to produce a reliable WW Score — treat any dimension scores as highly preliminary and seek more recent, numerous reviews before making a hiring decision.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only one review was analyzed. The single review praises Dana's professionalism (going above and beyond, great service), project completion (water leak resolved), and experience (handled a complex 1960s home issue). However, pricing is not mentioned. With only 1 review, confidence in any dimension is severely limited and cannot support a reliable overall WW Score.

• Only 1 review provided — statistically insufficient for reliable scoring
• No pricing information mentioned — cannot assess Price Friendly dimension
• Single positive review cannot establish patterns or validate consistency

This score cannot be calculated reliably with only one review; a minimum of 3 reviews is required to produce a trustworthy WW Score.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only 1 review was analyzed, which falls below the minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for a trustworthy WW Score calculation. The single review praises the company's honesty, fair pricing, and technical problem-solving ability, but a single data point cannot support reliable scoring across all dimensions.

• Only 1 review provided — minimum 3 reviews required for reliable WW Score
• Review is recent (April 2024) and contains specific details, reducing fake review concerns, but sample size is critically insufficient
• Project completion dimension has no explicit mention in the available review

This analysis cannot be trusted as a reliable score — only 1 review is far too small a sample to draw meaningful conclusions about contractor performance.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only 1 review was analyzed. This single review documents severe deficiencies across professionalism (poor communication, non-responsiveness to callbacks over 2 months), project completion (incomplete work, refusal to honor guarantee), and experience (poor workmanship quality with water damage, smudges, missed areas, and inadequate technique). No pricing information was mentioned. A reliable WW Score requires a minimum of 3 reviews.

• INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE SIZE: Only 1 review analyzed. WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• SINGLE NEGATIVE REVIEW: This review is extremely negative (1-star rating) and documents multiple serious failures. Without additional reviews for context or balance, no aggregate score can be responsibly generated.
• RECENCY: Review is recent (August 31, 2024), so it reflects current business practices.

This analysis cannot produce a trustworthy WW Score due to insufficient review volume (n=1). At minimum, 3 independent reviews are required to establish any meaningful confidence in contractor performance metrics.

Only one review is available for analysis, which is insufficient to calculate a reliable WW Score. The single review mentions professionalism (friendly, honest attitude), pricing (great price), and experience (knowledgeable), but provides no specific details about project completion, timeliness, or workmanship quality. With only 1 mention per dimension, confidence is severely limited and cannot support a composite score.

• Insufficient review volume: only 1 review analyzed. Minimum 3 reviews required for reliable scoring.
• Review lacks specific details about actual work performed, timeline, or project outcomes.
• Generic praise language without concrete examples or specifics.
• Cannot assess project completion dimension at all from available data.

This analysis cannot produce a trustworthy WW Score due to insufficient data volume (1 review). A minimum of 3 reviews is required to calculate a reliable composite score.