Find Nearby Plumbers In Miami, Florida

Liriano Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is the strongest pillar, with 22 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 18 reviews confirming jobs finished completely, on-time, and with follow-through on additional issues discovered. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 16 reviews, highlighting diagnostic ability, problem-solving, and quality workmanship. Pricing receives strong marks from 10 reviews citing fair, transparent, and reasonable rates with no hidden charges. The company's systematic approach (online scheduling, text quotes, arrival notifications, detailed invoicing) reinforces professionalism across all interactions.

• All 25 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback or critical comments. This uniformity is statistically unusual and warrants caution.
• Review language shows some repetitive phrasing patterns (e.g., 'excellent service,' 'professional,' 'highly recommend,' 'on time') across multiple reviews, which could suggest curated or incentivized feedback.
• Most reviews (20 of 25) are older than 12 months, with only 5 reviews from 2024. Recent review volume is limited.
• Several reviews contain unusually detailed praise and specific naming of team members (Ed, Joe, Osmel), which could indicate genuine long-term customers or potentially encouraged testimonials.
• No reviews mention any problems, delays, rework, or dissatisfaction. Complete absence of critical feedback is a red flag for review authenticity.

While the WW Score of 89.2 is supported by consistent evidence across all dimensions with HIGH confidence based on mention counts, the uniformity of 5-star ratings and absence of any critical feedback significantly reduces trust in this score as a true representation of performance. This score should be treated as an upper-bound estimate; actual performance may be somewhat lower. Recommend seeking independent verification or recent customer references before making a decision.

Ramon receives consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courteous demeanor, clear communication, and responsiveness including weekends and same-day service. Pricing is explicitly called out as fair, reasonable, or affordable in a significant number of reviews, with multiple customers noting he was cheaper than competing large plumbing companies and even proactively offered cost-saving alternatives. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished efficiently, on time, and with follow-through including warranty mentions and callbacks. Experience is evidenced by accurate diagnoses, problem-solving on complex or unusual plumbing situations (e.g., hidden bypass lines, 50-year-old systems), and technical explanations given to customers. One minor negative review noted the technician could not resolve the issue, which slightly tempers the project completion score.

• 5 reviews contained no text at all (blank body, rating only) and were excluded from dimension scoring — these provide no usable qualitative data.
• A cluster of 8 reviews share the exact same date of 2024-06-09, which may indicate batch submission or incentivized reviews. Language across these is varied enough to not conclusively indicate fabrication, but the date clustering is notable.
• Another cluster of 5 blank reviews all share the date 2023-06-10, further suggesting possible bulk or incentivized review activity around specific dates.
• All reviews are 5-star except one 4-star review, which is a mildly suspicious pattern across 49 reviews. However, the majority of reviews contain specific job details, named services, and unique phrasing, which reduces (but does not eliminate) fake review concern.
• One review (2023-02-11, 4-star) explicitly states the technician confirmed the problem but was unable to help — this is the only negative signal in the dataset and was factored into project completion scoring.
• Recency note: The majority of text-bearing reviews are from 2024–2025, which is within the past 12 months and lends strong recency weight to the score.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of detailed, specific reviews with strong recency, and is considered moderately reliable overall, though the presence of blank reviews and suspicious date clustering introduces a minor credibility caveat that prevents a full-confidence endorsement.

AJP Plumbing and Luis consistently receive strong praise across all four scored dimensions. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with every reviewer noting responsiveness, communication, punctuality, and courteous service. Project completion is equally well-supported, with multiple reviewers explicitly confirming jobs were finished quickly, on time, and with follow-through across ongoing work. Pricing is mentioned positively in three reviews, with specific callouts to fair pricing, no upselling, and upfront cost transparency. Experience is reflected in references to Luis being a master of his craft, correctly diagnosing issues, and solving problems that other contractors could not handle.

• All 6 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback of any kind — this warrants mild caution, though the reviews do contain specific details, named individuals, and varied scenarios that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Review volume is low (6 total), which limits statistical reliability despite high per-dimension confidence levels.
• Two reviews (2023-11-03 and 2023-12-11) are older than 12 months relative to the most recent review date; they carry slightly reduced recency weight but are consistent with more recent reviews.

This WW Score is moderately reliable given the small review pool of 6, but is supported by specific, detailed, and varied accounts across all dimensions with no detected fake review patterns.

Coastal Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions, with particularly strong marks for professionalism (89.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous behavior. The company excels at project completion (87.5) with numerous reviews confirming timely job delivery and follow-through on callbacks and warranties. Experience and technical knowledge (88.0) are well-documented through detailed accounts of complex diagnostics and skilled workmanship. Pricing (86.0) is consistently described as fair and transparent, with many customers noting Eddie's willingness to save them money by recommending phone-based solutions or directing them to cheaper alternatives. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a highly reliable contractor with strong customer satisfaction.

• Two negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2022-09-05 and 2021-12-14) present a stark contrast to the overwhelmingly positive feedback. The 2022-09-05 review alleges rudeness and an astronomical quote for a simple toilet unclog, while the 2021-12-14 review claims Eddie became unresponsive after initial contact. These isolated complaints suggest potential service inconsistency or communication breakdowns in specific situations, though they represent only 2.3% of all reviews.
• One review (2017-01-13) rated 4.0 stars instead of 5.0, noting initial price concerns, though the reviewer ultimately found the work justified the cost. This is the only non-extreme rating in the dataset.
• The dataset is heavily weighted toward recent reviews (majority from 2020 onward), with older reviews (2014-2019) also predominantly 5-star. This recency bias may inflate the current score if service quality has changed.
• While no clear patterns of fake reviews were detected, the uniformity of praise and near-universal 5-star ratings (85 of 87 reviews) is unusually high for any service business. However, specific details, varied customer situations, and the presence of two legitimate negative reviews suggest authenticity rather than fabrication.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, supported by 87 reviews with detailed, specific feedback across all four dimensions. The HIGH confidence rating is justified by substantial mention counts (35-72 per dimension) and consistency of positive feedback over an 8+ year period. However, the two negative reviews warrant caution—they suggest the company may occasionally struggle with communication or pricing clarity on certain job types, and prospective customers should clarify scope and pricing upfront to avoid disappointment.

Tri-County Repairs demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions with particularly high marks for professionalism and technical expertise. The contractor consistently receives praise for punctuality, communication, politeness, and skilled workmanship, with multiple reviews highlighting problem-solving ability that exceeded other plumbers' capabilities. Project completion is reliable with thorough follow-through and attention to detail. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though fewer reviews explicitly address cost. The one negative review from 2021 regarding responsiveness and service recovery stands out but is substantially outweighed by 35 positive reviews spanning multiple years.

• One negative review (2021-05-26, rating 2.5) indicates a service failure and poor responsiveness to customer concerns—this is a legitimate quality issue that should not be ignored despite overall positive trend
• Most reviews are from 2020-2021 (older than 12 months); only 9 reviews are from 2023-2024, which limits recency assessment
• Several reviews contain minor spelling/grammar inconsistencies (e.g., 'inmaculate', 'fadt and eficient') suggesting user-generated authentic feedback rather than fake reviews
• High concentration of 5-star ratings (31 of 36 reviews) is notable but supported by specific, detailed examples of work quality and problem-solving, reducing fake review suspicion

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable based on 36 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions, though the age of most reviews (2020-2021) and the presence of one documented service failure warrant consideration that current performance may differ from historical data.

Sam's Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 18 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, courtesy, and communication. Project completion is equally solid with 16 mentions of jobs finished efficiently, problems solved quickly, and follow-through on commitments. Pricing receives strong marks from 10 reviews highlighting fair costs, transparency, and value relative to competitors. Technical experience is evident in 12 reviews describing quality workmanship, problem-solving ability, and skill. All reviews are 5-star ratings with recent dates (primarily 2025 and late 2024), indicating sustained high performance.

• All 30 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is statistically unusual and warrants caution
• Several reviews contain minimal detail ('Good', 'Amazing job', 'It was amazing') which reduces specificity but does not invalidate the data
• Multiple reviews use similar phrasing patterns ('highly recommend', 'will definitely use again', 'professional and punctual') suggesting possible review clustering or template-like responses
• Approximately 40% of reviews lack specific dates (marked 'None'), making recency assessment partially limited
• No reviews mention any problems, delays, quality issues, or complaints—absence of critical feedback is notable

This WW Score of 88.2 is based on substantial evidence (30 reviews with 10+ mentions per dimension) and carries HIGH overall confidence. However, the uniformity of 5-star ratings and lack of any critical feedback should be interpreted with caution—this score reflects consistently positive customer sentiment but may not capture the full spectrum of real-world performance variability. The score is reliable for identifying this contractor as highly-rated but should be considered in context with the unusual absence of any negative reviews.