Woodrow a Ralph

With only 3 reviews spanning a 6-year period (2013–2016), this dataset is too small to generate a reliable WW Score. The reviews present sharply contradictory evidence: one highly detailed complaint (2016) documents severe professionalism failures (rudeness, poor communication, mess left behind, unresponsiveness to complaint), while one positive review (2013) praises responsiveness and honesty. ... Read more

With only 3 reviews spanning a 6-year period (2013–2016), this dataset is too small to generate a reliable WW Score. The reviews present sharply contradictory evidence: one highly detailed complaint (2016) documents severe professionalism failures (rudeness, poor communication, mess left behind, unresponsiveness to complaint), while one positive review (2013) praises responsiveness and honesty. A second negative review (2014) cites complete non-response to an emergency call. The extreme variance and minimal sample size prevent confident scoring. Read less