Find Nearby Plumbers In Fort Collins, Colorado

Only a single review is available, dated May 2019, making it over five years old and of limited current relevance. The reviewer briefly mentions fast service, fair pricing, and great workmanship, but provides no specific details or context to substantiate these claims. Because the review is extremely brief and generic, scores have been kept conservative across all dimensions. The lack of specificity and the age of the review significantly reduce the reliability of any scoring derived from this data.

• Only 1 review analyzed — far below the minimum threshold of 3 required for a reliable WW Score.
• Review is dated May 2019, making it more than 5 years old. Current performance cannot be inferred.
• Review language is vague and generic with no specific details about the job, contractor behavior, or outcomes. This limits scoring confidence.
• Cannot rule out that this is a low-effort or potentially non-genuine review due to its brevity and lack of specifics.

This WW Score cannot be calculated reliably due to insufficient review volume (1 review) and the age and vagueness of the sole available review — no meaningful conclusions about this contractor's current quality should be drawn from this data.

Insufficient data — only 1 review analyzed. The single review mentions attention to detail and personal care (experience dimension) and implies professional conduct, but provides no explicit information about pricing, project completion, timeliness, or communication. The review is also from 2018, over 6 years old, limiting its relevance to current service quality.

• Insufficient review volume (n=1) — cannot calculate reliable WW Score
• Review is from January 2018 — significantly outside the 12-month recency window
• Review lacks specific details about scope, timeline, or pricing
• Generic praise language without concrete examples of work quality

This analysis cannot produce a trustworthy WW Score due to insufficient review volume (minimum 3 reviews required). A single review from 2018 is not representative of current contractor performance.

Only a single review is available, which severely limits the reliability of any scoring. The review is positive, describing Robert as friendly, knowledgeable, and helpful, and notes the job — restoring hot water — was completed successfully. Professionalism and experience scores are conservatively set given the limited data. Pricing was not mentioned at all and cannot be scored. No patterns of fake reviews are detected, but the review is brief and lacks granular detail.

• Only 1 review analyzed — far below the minimum threshold of 3 required for a reliable WW Score.
• Pricing dimension has zero data and is excluded from all calculations.
• Review is from 2021, making it over 3 years old — recency weighting is low.
• Single review with generic positive language and no specific technical details — treat all dimension scores with extreme caution.

This score is based on a single review from 2021 and should not be considered a reliable indicator of this contractor's overall quality or consistency.

Only one review is available, which limits the reliability of any scoring. That single review speaks positively about Joshua's communication, work ethic, technical knowledge, and respectfulness of the home, supporting moderate-to-high scores in professionalism and experience. Project completion is scored conservatively at 80 because the reviewer mentions expanding scope mid-project, which suggests work was completed but the original scope evolved — a mild uncertainty. Pricing was not mentioned at all in the review, so no score can be assigned for that dimension. All scores carry LIMITED confidence due to the single-review basis.

• Only 1 review provided — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably per minimum threshold of 3 reviews.
• Reviewer explicitly notes there are no approved Yelp reviews and references hidden/filtered reviews as the basis for trust — this suggests a very thin public review history for this contractor.
• Single 5-star review with no pricing information mentioned — pricing dimension cannot be evaluated.
• With only one data point, all dimension scores should be treated as highly provisional and not representative of consistent contractor performance.

This score report is based on a single review and should not be considered a reliable indicator of this contractor's overall quality — at least 3 reviews are required for a meaningful WW Score calculation.

This single review describes a garbage disposal installation that was completed quickly (30 minutes) but with severe pricing concerns. The plumber was described as polite and personable but allegedly quoted a price 4x higher than the initial phone quote without clear communication or agreement. The customer felt misled and manipulated, though acknowledges their own inattention. The work itself appears to have been finished, but the pricing practices and communication failures dominate the complaint.

• INSUFFICIENT DATA: Only 1 review provided. WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• PRICING CONCERN: Significant discrepancy between initial phone quote ($120/hour) and final charge ($495 for ~30 minutes). Customer alleges bait-and-switch or high-balling tactics.
• COMMUNICATION FAILURE: Plumber allegedly quoted verbally at high speed and mumbled; customer claims no clear agreement was reached despite plumber's assertion of a handshake deal.
• EXPERIENCE DIMENSION: No explicit mention of technical skill, workmanship quality, or problem-solving ability—only that the job was completed quickly.
• RECENCY: Review is from August 2024 (recent), lending some timeliness to the assessment.

This score cannot be trusted as a reliable assessment of CMS because only one review was analyzed, falling below the minimum threshold of 3 reviews required for meaningful WW Score calculation. The single review raises serious red flags about pricing transparency and communication practices, but a single data point is insufficient to draw conclusions about overall contractor performance.

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. The single review provided is a product review for a kitchen faucet fixture (FootFaucet), not a contractor or plumber service review. It contains no information about contractor professionalism, pricing for services, project completion timelines, or workmanship quality in the context of plumbing services. This review is not applicable to the WW Score framework.

• Review is for a product (FootFaucet kitchen fixture), not a contractor/plumber service
• No service-related dimensions can be evaluated from this review
• Insufficient data: only 1 review provided, and it is not relevant to contractor evaluation

This WW Score cannot be calculated or trusted because the provided review does not evaluate a contractor or plumber's services.