Find Nearby Plumbers In Stockton, California

Essential Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 52 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and communication. Project completion is consistently praised with 48 mentions of finished work, timely delivery, and follow-through. Technical expertise and problem-solving ability are well-documented across 42 mentions, with customers noting Eli's ability to diagnose issues correctly and provide efficient solutions. Pricing receives solid marks (82.0) based on 18 mentions of fair, competitive, and transparent quotes. However, two significant negative reviews from 2015 and 2023 reveal serious lapses in communication and diagnostic accuracy that temper the otherwise excellent reputation.

• CRITICAL: Two 1-star reviews reveal serious service failures. 2023 review: inadequate inspection, no follow-up on voicemail, misdiagnosis of leak source. 2015 review: complete communication breakdown—promised proposal never sent, customer left hanging despite explicit commitment. These are not minor complaints but represent fundamental failures in professionalism and reliability.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Majority of reviews (45+ out of 67) are from 2011-2019, with only 8 reviews from 2023-2024. Recent reviews show mixed quality (one 1-star in 2023), suggesting possible service inconsistency or quality decline. Limited recent data reduces confidence in current performance.
• SUSPICIOUS PATTERN: 7 reviews with no dates and generic praise language ('top-notch', 'highly recommend', 'excellent experience') appear potentially fabricated or template-generated. These lack specific details about work performed or technician names. Confidence reduced slightly due to this pattern.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: Two identical reviews dated 2016-04-20 about sink leak repair suggest data duplication or review manipulation.
• MINIMAL CONTENT: Several reviews contain only 1-3 words ('unknown', '.', 'Things went as expected', 'Professional') and provide no substantive information. These were counted but carry minimal evidentiary weight.
• INCONSISTENT NAMING: Reviews reference multiple technician names (Eli, Tim, Sven, Ezra, Miguel, Cody, Mauricio, Steve from Padilla Plumbing), making it unclear if all represent the same company or if quality varies by technician.

This WW Score of 84.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While the majority of reviews (65 out of 67) are positive and detailed, the presence of two severe 1-star reviews documenting communication failures and misdiagnosis, combined with heavy skew toward older reviews (2011-2019) and a cluster of suspicious generic recent reviews, suggests the score may overstate current reliability. The company demonstrates strong technical capability and professionalism in most cases, but has documented failures in communication and diagnostic accuracy that customers should be aware of. Recent performance data is insufficient to confirm whether quality issues have been resolved.

Valice Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 26 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and communication—the owner Valentine and his team consistently receive praise for same-day service and courteous interactions. Experience is also well-documented (18 mentions), with customers highlighting skilled diagnostics, problem-solving, and quality workmanship. Project completion is solid (22 mentions), with jobs finished on time and follow-through honored. Pricing presents the most nuance: while 13 reviews praise fair and reasonable rates, 3 reviews express significant concerns about high charges relative to work performed, creating a mixed but ultimately positive pricing profile. The company's conservative approach to honest assessment (e.g., directing a customer to call the city instead of charging for unnecessary work) reinforces trustworthiness.

• One 1-star review (2018-09-15) describes a serious negative experience with alleged miscommunication and overcharging ($420 for work that took 20 minutes). This is a significant outlier and suggests potential communication or pricing transparency issues in isolated cases.
• One 3-star review (2019-04-09) flags a $20 credit card processing fee (10% on a small repair), which the reviewer found excessive and potentially problematic. This suggests occasional friction around payment methods.
• One 3-star review (2024-04-19) reports a $750 charge for 3 hours of work on a kitchen sink with minimal parts ($50), indicating pricing concerns persist. However, a similar review (2024-04-15) shows the owner proactively communicating price changes via photos and quotes before proceeding, suggesting improved transparency.
• One 4-star review (2020-02-06) mentions the company 'flaked on appointment twice,' indicating occasional reliability issues with scheduling.
• Review recency: 12 of 33 reviews (36%) are from 2024 or 2023, showing recent activity. However, 21 reviews (64%) are from 2022 or earlier, with some dating back to 2018. Recent reviews show consistent quality but also reveal ongoing pricing concerns.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific details, varied experiences, and authentic language patterns.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable, based on 33 reviews with substantial mention counts across all dimensions (16–26 mentions each). The company excels in professionalism and experience but shows legitimate variability in pricing perception; customers should expect fair rates in most cases but should request detailed quotes and clarification before work begins, particularly for complex jobs.

McKee Brothers Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, friendliness, and responsiveness across 16 reviews. Project completion is solid with most jobs finished properly, though one significant 2024 review detailed multiple callbacks, incomplete work, and poor communication during a renovation project that substantially lowered this dimension's score. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 11 reviews, with customers noting proper diagnostics, quality workmanship, and problem-solving ability. Pricing feedback is limited (6 mentions) but mixed—customers acknowledge fair value and transparency, though some note costs were higher than expected. The company's strength lies in emergency responsiveness and professional demeanor, but the recent major service failure indicates consistency issues.

• One detailed negative review from September 2024 describes serious project completion failures including no-shows, incomplete work, incorrect installations, and lack of owner accountability. This significantly impacts the project completion score and suggests potential reliability issues despite overwhelmingly positive other reviews.
• 19 of 21 reviews are 5-star ratings with 1 five-star at 4.0 and 1 one-star. While the positive reviews contain specific details (names, technical descriptions, emergency response times), the concentration of 5-star ratings warrants caution. However, the detailed negative review and specific praise details suggest these are genuine rather than fabricated.
• Most reviews are from 2021-2024, with good recency. The most recent negative review (September 2024) is recent enough to reflect current operations.

This WW Score of 84.2 should be treated with moderate-to-high confidence for emergency and routine plumbing work, but potential customers should be aware of the September 2024 project completion failure involving poor communication and multiple callbacks on a complex renovation job, which suggests the company may struggle with larger, multi-phase projects or coordination when multiple jobs compete for resources.

Carlos demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous communication across 12 reviews. His pricing is fair and transparent, with multiple customers noting affordability and honest cost-saving suggestions (8 mentions). Project completion is solid with numerous multi-project examples and follow-through, though two older reviews (2022-2023) cite no-shows for estimates, creating some reliability concerns (11 mentions). His technical expertise spans plumbing, electrical, drywall, painting, and general handyman work, with customers consistently praising quality workmanship (10 mentions). The WW Score of 84.2 reflects strong overall performance tempered by documented scheduling issues in the past.

• Two 1-star reviews from 2022-2023 cite failure to show for initial estimates, suggesting past reliability issues with appointment management. These are older but represent material concerns about follow-through.
• Most positive reviews are from 2021-2022 with a cluster of 5-star ratings; however, recent 2024 reviews also confirm continued positive performance, suggesting improvement or inconsistent service patterns.
• One review (2022-08-31) is exceptionally detailed and lengthy with multiple family member testimonials; while credible, the level of detail is atypical and could indicate a particularly satisfied customer rather than representative experience.
• No fake review patterns detected; reviews contain specific project details, varied writing styles, and balanced acknowledgment of trade-offs (e.g., 'not cheap but quality work').

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable and should be trusted as a fair assessment. It is based on 15 reviews with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, supported by 8-12 mentions per category. However, the score is tempered by documented scheduling failures in 2022-2023; potential customers should be aware that while recent reviews show improvement, appointment reliability has been an issue historically.

Mr. Ed's Plumbing & Rooter Service earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness across dozens of detailed reviews spanning several years. Project completion scores well, with the large majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished same-day or within the promised timeframe, and several noting follow-through on callbacks and guarantees; however, three negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) describe incomplete or ineffective work, a broken warranty promise, overcharging, and a failure to return a call, which meaningfully tempers this dimension. Pricing is generally viewed favorably, with many reviewers calling costs reasonable or affordable and praising upfront quotes, though one reviewer noted a final price higher than the phone quote and another felt overcharged at $627 for a job they believed was worth under $300. Experience scores solidly based on numerous mentions of knowledgeable diagnostics, problem-solving on complex jobs (slab leaks, collapsed sewer lines, difficult leak detection), and quality workmanship, though the negative reviews introduce some doubt about consistency across all technicians.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Three reviews dated 2021-01-17 contain nearly identical text about 'Mr. Ed is a plumber of course of course' — these appear to be the same review submitted multiple times. Only one was counted for scoring purposes.
• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Two reviews dated 2020-09-11 contain identical text about Anthony Sharde and the garbage disposal installation. Only one was counted for scoring purposes.
• 35 BLANK REVIEWS: A significant number of reviews (approximately 35) contain no text — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence per scoring rules, though they inflate the overall star average.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW PATTERN: Three substantive negative reviews (1-star x2, 2-star x1) describe: (1) failed leak repair with holes left in walls and no reimbursement as promised, (2) a drain line cleared inadequately with no warranty honored and upselling pressure, and (3) a $627 overcharge for a sink repair that subsequently leaked. These are credible, specific complaints that reduce confidence in consistency of workmanship and warranty follow-through.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of detailed reviews are from 2019-2021, with a moderate volume from 2024-2025. The most recent reviews (2025) are generally positive and detailed, suggesting continued quality service, but the blank 5-star reviews clustered in May 2025 are a minor concern for authenticity.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: A number of short reviews (e.g., 'Great job', 'Great customer service', 'Did good work', 'they are awesome') provide no specific detail and were not counted toward dimension scores. Their volume slightly raises a concern about padding, though the large number of genuinely detailed reviews offsets this concern.

This WW Score is based on a large volume of reviews with substantial usable detail and carries HIGH overall confidence, but should be interpreted with the caveat that a small number of credible negative reviews highlight real inconsistencies in workmanship quality and warranty follow-through, particularly with non-owner technicians, and approximately 35 blank 5-star reviews and several duplicate submissions modestly inflate the raw star average without contributing verifiable evidence.

Crystal Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with the vast majority of reviewers praising prompt responsiveness, courteous technicians, and honest communication. Pricing is a consistent highlight, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting fair, competitive, or below-market quotes and a lack of upselling. Project completion is generally excellent, including same-day service, callbacks honored at no charge, and follow-through on permits — though two notable negative reviews cite a warranty dispute where the company refused to return for a repeat leak, and a separate case where a city permit was never delivered after months of follow-up. Experience is well-supported by detailed accounts of skilled diagnostics, complex sewer and pipe work, and technicians who correctly identified problems that other companies missed. Scores are modestly tempered by four 1-star reviews covering rudeness, alleged dishonesty, overcharging, and a warranty refusal, which prevent top-tier scores despite the overwhelming volume of positive feedback.

• 12 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Several reviews use very similar or near-identical phrasing (e.g., two reviews dated 2024-07-22 and 2023-08-21 are word-for-word duplicates about Rudy and Bob). This may indicate a copy-paste error or a duplicated submission rather than a fake review, but it was counted only once per unique event.
• A cluster of reviews dated exactly '2022-06-10' with no specific detail (e.g., 'Best plumbers with more than fair prices', 'Best Plumbing services in Lodi!!!! Fast, Smart and cheap!!!!') shows signs of generic, low-detail praise with no specifics. These were scored conservatively.
• One 1-star review (2022-06-10) alleges the company refused to honor a 1-year warranty on a leak repair — a direct project completion failure. This was weighted in the project completion score.
• One 3-star review (2022-11-16) documents a failure to deliver a city permit over two months despite repeated follow-up — a project completion and professionalism concern that was factored into scoring.
• One 1-star review (2024-03-18) alleges misdiagnosis, an $80 diagnostic fee for under 5 minutes of work, and refusal to credit the fee toward installation — a pricing and experience concern factored into both dimensions.
• One 1-star review (2025-05-10) states 'These guys are just rude' with no further detail. Weighted lightly due to lack of specifics but noted as a professionalism flag.
• One 1-star review (2022-06-10) states only 'Very expensive' with no context. Weighted lightly due to lack of specifics.
• Reviews span from 2010 to 2025. Reviews from 2010–2017 reflect a prior ownership era (Jerry, then Dave). The business has changed hands at least once. Scores are weighted toward post-2020 reviews which reflect current ownership and operations.
• The 4-star review from 2023-05-22 explicitly notes the yard was left in poor condition after a sewer line replacement and the callback to address it was also unsatisfactory — a minor project completion deduction applied.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year dataset of 97 reviews with usable content and carries HIGH overall confidence; however, consumers should note the presence of a small but credible cluster of negative reviews citing warranty refusal, permit non-delivery, and alleged misdiagnosis, which represent real service risks that the score partially reflects but cannot fully capture.