Find Nearby Plumbers In San Francisco, California

Albert Hall Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by an overwhelming volume of reviews praising punctuality, friendliness, responsiveness, and fast job completion. Project completion is the highest-weighted dimension and is consistently supported — the vast majority of reviewers confirm issues were fully resolved, often in under 30 minutes, with no reports of abandoned or incomplete work aside from one access-related incident. Professionalism scores slightly lower due to one credible 1-star review (August 2024) in which Albert reportedly showed up unannounced, failed to communicate proactively, and responded rudely when questioned — a meaningful data point that prevents a top-tier score. Pricing data is limited to a handful of explicit mentions but those references are uniformly positive, describing charges as reasonable and fair. Experience is well-supported by repeated references to quick diagnosis, quality repairs, proactive part replacement, and preventative advice given to customers.

• One credible 1-star review (2024-08-12) describes unprofessional communication behavior — showing up unannounced, failing to follow up, and responding dismissively to a reasonable inquiry. This is a meaningful outlier in an otherwise near-perfect review set and was weighted accordingly in the professionalism score.
• The review set is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (77 out of 78 reviews are 5 stars), which warrants mild scrutiny. However, most reviews contain specific job details, unique writing styles, and varied scenarios, reducing the likelihood of systematic fake reviews. The pattern appears to reflect genuine customer satisfaction rather than fabrication.
• A small number of reviews are generic and brief (e.g., 'Amazing service! So fast and Albert went above and beyond') with no job-specific detail. These were counted for mention purposes but given reduced weight in scoring.
• Several reviews note that Albert was dispatched through a property management company rather than hired directly. This means some reviewers may not have visibility into pricing, which explains the low pricing mention count.
• The majority of reviews fall within the past 12–24 months (2023–2024), which supports recency confidence. A small number of reviews date to 2020–2022 and were given slightly lower recency weight.

This WW Score is based on 78 reviews with strong recency, high mention counts across all dimensions, and largely specific, credible review content — making it one of the more reliable profiles in the scoring system, tempered only slightly by the near-universal 5-star distribution and one notable negative review.

One Source Plumbing and Rooter, led primarily by Mo (Mostafa), earns very strong scores across all four dimensions based on an extensive and detailed review base spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness at all hours including late nights and weekends, clear communication, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting Mo came in below competitor quotes and occasionally waived charges entirely. Project completion scores slightly lower due to two negative reviews: one documenting a failed drain clearing attempt that left cabinet staining and tools behind, and another citing a rude lead plumber, poor cleanup, and a job that required a callback for a re-leak. Experience scores high overall, with many reviewers describing skilled problem-solving on complex jobs including full repiping, sewer line replacement, and creative fixes on old pipes, though the two negative reviews introduce a modest downward adjustment.

• Two reviews rated 2-stars (2021-05-14 and 2021-02-22) describe meaningful service failures: a re-leak requiring callback, poor cleanup, rude lead plumber behavior, and a job left incomplete. These are credible and specific and have been factored into scoring.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with no negative feedback, which is statistically unusual for 72 reviews. However, the reviews are highly specific, include named technicians, describe unique job details, and span nearly 10 years — this pattern is consistent with a genuinely strong operator rather than fake reviews.
• No suspected fake review pattern detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, writing style, and job type. Confidence in authenticity is HIGH.
• Recency note: Approximately 10 of 72 reviews are from the past 12 months (2024). The bulk of reviews are from 2015–2022. The most recent reviews remain positive and consistent with historical patterns, suggesting no meaningful quality decline.

This WW Score is based on 72 reviews with strong specificity and a wide date range, yielding HIGH confidence across all four dimensions — this score is highly reliable and can be trusted as an accurate representation of One Source Plumbing and Rooter's service quality.

Oakland Rooter & Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning late 2022 through late 2024. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, courteous technicians, clear communication, and respectful property care such as shoe covers and clean worksites. Project completion scores are high but tempered slightly by one notable negative review describing an incomplete job, a rude technician, and a failure to follow through on quoted services. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and reasonable, with multiple mentions of free estimates, no-charge service calls for minor issues, and competitive quotes — though two reviewers noted costs felt slightly high relative to scope of work, and one described feeling pressured before negotiating down. Experience scores are strong, with many reviewers citing skilled diagnostics, above-and-beyond problem-solving, and technically sound workmanship across a wide variety of job types.

• One 2-star review (January 2024) describes a technician who was rude, condescending, failed to complete quoted work, and then went silent — this is a meaningful negative data point that has been factored into project completion and professionalism scores.
• One reviewer (June 2024) described feeling 'shaken down' for more than the advertised $99 special before negotiating a lower price — this has been factored into the pricing score.
• One reviewer (September 2024) felt the cost was not in line with the scope of work for a short job — factored into pricing score.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star, which warrants mild fake-review scrutiny. However, reviews are highly specific: they name individual technicians, describe unique job details, reference specific prices, and vary in writing style. No significant fake review pattern detected.
• Review volume is high and consistent across 2023–2024, suggesting an active and genuine customer base. Recency is strong — the majority of reviews fall within the past 12 months relative to the most recent review date of November 2024.

This WW Score is based on 82 reviews with a high proportion of detailed, specific, and independently written accounts, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — the primary caveat is that the overwhelming positivity should be read alongside the small number of negative pricing and conduct complaints, which are real but minority experiences.

Next Level Plumbing Services receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers consistently highlight punctuality, responsiveness, courteous communication, and after-hours availability. Pricing is a notable strength, with numerous reviewers explicitly calling out reasonable estimates, transparent quotes, and no surprise charges, including one reviewer who noted the cost was significantly lower than competitors and another who confirmed the final bill matched the original estimate exactly. Project completion scores are strong but are modestly tempered by two negative reviews: one where Orlando canceled a confirmed holiday appointment without adequate notice, and one where a reviewer felt the diagnosis was incorrect and a second plumber resolved the issue without pipe replacement. Experience and workmanship are well-supported by specific accounts of complex jobs — gas leaks, sewer line replacements, water main repairs, and tankless water heater installs — handled skillfully, though the misdiagnosis complaint introduces a small but real concern. One duplicate review was detected (identical text appearing on 2023-06-10 and 2023-04-14), which slightly reduces confidence in the raw review count.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review describing a water main breakage with tree root damage and Edmond's team appears verbatim twice — dated 2023-06-10 and 2023-04-14. This may indicate a copy-paste error by the reviewer or a platform artifact, but it inflates the review count and has been treated as a single data point.
• TWO BLANK REVIEWS (4-star and 5-star, both dated 2024-06-09) contain no text and provide no usable data. They were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• ONE NEGATIVE PROFESSIONALISM/COMPLETION FLAG: A 2-star review (2022-05-31) reports a confirmed appointment was canceled on a holiday Monday morning with no prior notification — a meaningful reliability concern.
• ONE NEGATIVE EXPERIENCE/COMPLETION FLAG: A 2-star review (2022-02-28) reports that Orlando declared a pipe replacement necessary after failing to clear a clog, but a second plumber successfully cleared it without replacement. This raises a limited but notable concern about diagnostic accuracy.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2021–2023. Only 5 reviews are dated within the past 12 months (2024–2025). The most recent reviews remain positive, but the lower volume of recent data means current performance is less thoroughly documented.
• NEAR-UNIFORM 5-STAR RATINGS: 51 of 53 reviews are 5-star. While the reviews contain specific details and named individuals that reduce fake review suspicion, the near-perfect rating distribution warrants mild caution.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning multiple years and is considered moderately reliable, though users should note the low volume of recent reviews, two credible negative incidents, and one confirmed duplicate review when making hiring decisions.

Plumbing Pure receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, responsiveness, clear communication, and courteous demeanor across a large number of reviews. Pricing is noted favorably in roughly half the reviews, with multiple customers explicitly calling out competitive or fair rates, one reviewer noting a quote at one-quarter of competitors' prices, and another tipping 30% out of satisfaction. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing same-day or next-day resolutions, emergency responsiveness, and follow-through on complex or unusual jobs. Experience and technical skill are affirmed across a range of job types including tankless water heaters, heat pump water heater installation, leak detection, and drain issues, with several reviewers specifically praising diagnostic thoroughness and creative problem-solving. One negative review exists but relates to a job the contractor declined to take rather than a failure to complete work, which moderately tempers but does not significantly undermine the overall picture.

• All 22 positive reviews are rated 5.0 stars with no partial ratings, which warrants mild scrutiny for potential review curation or selection bias.
• Several reviews share very similar phrasing around responsiveness and punctuality (e.g., 'responsive,' 'punctual,' 'communicative' appearing across many reviews), though the specificity of job details in most reviews reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• Two reviews posted on the same date (2024-05-18) and two on the same date (2023-07-27) — while not conclusive, this pattern is worth noting.
• One 1-star review (2023-05-05) describes the contractor declining a job rather than performing poorly; this has been noted but weighted accordingly as it does not reflect a workmanship or completion failure.
• No reviews mention any negative outcomes, callbacks for failed work, or pricing disputes beyond the one declination review — the absence of any critical feedback across 22 positive reviews slightly elevates fake review risk, though specific job details in many reviews provide meaningful credibility.
• Recency note: The majority of reviews fall within the past 12 months (2024), which is a positive signal for current service quality.

This WW Score is based on 23 reviews with strong recency and reasonable specificity across all four dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence overall, though the uniformly perfect star ratings and some repetitive language introduce a mild caution that the score may skew slightly optimistic.

ROS Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised quality — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, responsiveness, kindness, and above-and-beyond communication such as FaceTime troubleshooting and proactive ETAs. Technical experience is also very well-documented, with multiple reviewers specifically calling out expertise in complex systems like radiant floor heating, hydronic boilers, and tankless water heaters. Project completion scores are high, supported by accounts of same-day fixes, multi-job visits completed efficiently, and follow-through on callbacks. Pricing is mentioned positively in five reviews, with words like 'reasonable,' 'fair,' and 'looking out for my best interest,' though it is the least-mentioned dimension. One standout ethical moment — a plumber advising a customer to try a free fix before hiring — further supports the pricing and professionalism scores.

• All 16 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild scrutiny. However, the reviews contain specific names (Niall, Fernando, Rohan), detailed job descriptions, and unique scenarios, which significantly reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• Review recency is mixed: 6 reviews are from 2024–2023, 4 from 2022, and 6 from 2021 or earlier (including one from 2011). Older reviews (pre-2022) were given reduced weight in scoring. The most recent reviews remain consistent in tone and quality, suggesting sustained performance.
• The review from 2011 and the review from 2014 are over 10 years old and carry minimal weight in this analysis. They were noted but not heavily factored into dimension scores.

This WW Score is based on 16 reviews with strong specificity and consistent detail across all dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence overall, though the absence of any negative feedback and the presence of several older reviews means the score should be treated as a strong positive signal rather than a guaranteed benchmark.