Find Nearby Plumbers In San Francisco, California

JJ Rooter & Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance driven by exceptional project completion and professionalism. Jorge and his team consistently deliver responsive, timely service with high-quality workmanship across complex plumbing projects. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness, with multiple customers citing unexpectedly high charges for relatively quick jobs ($385–$785 for work completed in under an hour), though many long-term customers report fair pricing when comparing multiple quotes. The company excels at emergency response, communication, and technical expertise, but pricing transparency and consistency require improvement.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews (2023-09-23, 2023-07-12, 2022-05-01, 2022-03-28) report significantly higher final costs than initial estimates or quotes. One customer was quoted $385–$485 but charged $685; another paid $385 for 32 minutes of work. This pattern suggests either unclear initial quoting or scope creep not communicated upfront.
• COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN (2023-03-04): One review documents a significant office/scheduling failure where customer received no callback despite calling Saturday morning, waiting all day, and calling back at 3pm. Technician eventually arrived at 6:30pm without prior notice. Customer rated work 5 stars but office communication 1–2 stars, indicating inconsistent backend operations.
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2020–2024, with strong concentration in 2021–2023. Recent reviews (2024) continue to show 5-star ratings, suggesting current performance remains high.
• NO FAKE REVIEW INDICATORS: Reviews show genuine variation in detail, specific project descriptions, and honest criticism (pricing complaints). Language is natural and diverse. No suspicious patterns detected.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable, based on 100 reviews with strong data across all dimensions. Professionalism and project completion are exceptionally well-documented (68 and 72 mentions respectively), while pricing concerns are substantiated by multiple independent accounts of cost overruns. The score reflects a company that excels operationally but has documented pricing transparency issues that warrant customer caution.

Thumbs Up Rooter and Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions, with particularly consistent praise for professionalism, project completion, and technical expertise. The company excels at responsiveness, punctuality, and communication—with Sal and his team (Eddie, Gabe, Edgar, and others) frequently noted as quick to respond and easy to work with. Project completion is reliable, with jobs finished on time and follow-through honored. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and competitive, though a small number of reviews flag concerns about high service call charges or aggressive upselling. Technical competency is high, with plumbers demonstrating problem-solving ability and willingness to explore multiple solutions before recommending expensive work. The one significant negative review (July 2024) alleges unprofessional behavior and overcharging, which slightly tempers the otherwise exceptional ratings.

• One detailed negative review (July 2024) alleges combative behavior, fabricated phone conversation claims, and aggressive service call charging. This contrasts sharply with the overwhelmingly positive pattern and warrants investigation into whether this represents an isolated incident or systemic issue.
• One review (September 2023) alleges the company reported a customer to Yelp for a negative review and questions the authenticity of the 5-star reviews. This raises concerns about review manipulation, though the claim is unverified.
• One review (October 2023) reports high pricing ($700 for hydro-jetting) with partial refund ($200) after owner contact, suggesting potential pricing inconsistency or initial overcharging.
• One review (May 2021) criticizes Sal for quoting $200+ labor to replace entire faucet when only hose replacement was needed, contrasting with the company's general reputation for honesty.
• The vast majority of reviews (88 of 92) are 5-star ratings with very positive language. While individual reviews contain specific details and vary in writing style, the concentration of perfect ratings is unusually high and warrants some caution regarding potential selection bias or review curation.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable based on 92 reviews with substantial mention counts across all dimensions (42–71 mentions per dimension). However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that three negative reviews raise legitimate concerns about pricing practices, customer service consistency, and potential review management, which are not fully captured in the aggregate score. The company's true performance likely falls in the 80–87 range depending on whether the negative incidents represent isolated failures or systemic patterns.

Rick De Leon of The Plumbing Two demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 62 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor—often highlighting same-day or emergency service. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 58 reviews confirming jobs finished thoroughly and on time. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 45 reviews, with customers noting his systematic problem-solving and quality workmanship. Pricing presents the only meaningful concern: while 28 reviews praise fair and reasonable rates, 4 negative reviews explicitly cite overpricing, lack of upfront transparency, and inflated labor charges. This pricing inconsistency prevents a higher overall score despite exceptional performance in other areas.

• POTENTIAL DUPLICATE REVIEW: Two nearly identical reviews from 'Giovani' dated 2022-07-22 (21:21:37 and 21:14:06) with identical text and only minor name variation ('Giovani' vs 'Giovani P.'). This suggests possible accidental resubmission rather than fake review activity.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Four 1-star reviews (2024-02-19, 2024-01-15, 2019-02-06, 2019-02-06 update) explicitly cite overpricing, lack of upfront quotes, and non-transparent labor charges. These are substantive complaints that contradict the majority positive pricing feedback. The 2019-02-06 review notes another customer reported similar treatment, suggesting a pattern rather than isolated incident.
• REVIEW AGE DISTRIBUTION: Approximately 35% of reviews are from 2018 or earlier (pre-2019). While recent reviews (2024) are predominantly positive, older reviews show more pricing complaints. This may indicate service quality improvements over time or changing customer expectations.
• MINOR INCONSISTENCY: One review (2018-02-26) reports Rick failed to show up and was unresponsive—a rare but notable departure from the otherwise consistent responsiveness pattern documented in 62 other reviews.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable, based on 75 reviews with strong data across all dimensions. Professionalism and project completion are supported by 58–62 mentions each (HIGH confidence), and experience by 45 mentions (HIGH confidence). However, the pricing dimension (28 mentions, MODERATE confidence) shows genuine conflict: while most customers report fair pricing, a credible minority reports significant overcharging and lack of transparency. The score reflects this mixed pricing reality rather than dismissing negative feedback. The overall assessment is that Rick De Leon delivers excellent service quality and reliability, but potential customers should request detailed upfront quotes and pricing transparency before engaging, particularly for larger jobs.

Dr. Drain demonstrates strong overall performance with particularly high marks for project completion and professionalism. The contractor consistently delivers work on time, responds quickly to service calls, and maintains professional demeanor throughout interactions. Technical expertise is evident across diverse plumbing tasks from drain cleaning to water heater replacement. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness, with two detailed negative reviews citing significantly inflated labor charges relative to materials and time invested, though one customer received a partial rebate. The company's responsiveness and workmanship quality are consistently praised across 38 reviews mentioning completion metrics.

• PRICING CONCERN: Two substantive negative reviews (ratings 1.0 and 2.0) explicitly document pricing practices perceived as excessive. The 2.0-star review details $734 charged for approximately $30 in materials and ~1 hour labor. The 1.0-star review alleges attempted fraud through misrepresentation of damage severity. These are not generic complaints but specific documented incidents.
• REVIEW COMPOSITION: 16 reviews lack dates (35% of dataset), making recency assessment incomplete. However, dated reviews span 2023-2025 with recent activity, suggesting ongoing business operations.
• POTENTIAL PATTERN: The 1.0-star review (Sept 2023) describes a serious integrity issue (alleged deliberate misrepresentation to inflate charges). While isolated, this contradicts the 'honest' and 'trustworthy' language in other reviews and warrants caution.
• CONFIDENCE LIMITATION ON PRICING: Only 6 mentions of pricing across 45 reviews (13% mention rate). While two are highly detailed and negative, the limited overall mention count prevents HIGH confidence scoring on this dimension.

This WW Score of 84.2 is moderately reliable for professionalism and project completion (HIGH confidence, 32+ mentions each), but should be interpreted cautiously regarding overall trustworthiness due to documented pricing concerns and one serious allegation of fraudulent practices that contradict the predominantly positive narrative.

Hemi's Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across professionalism, project completion, and technical expertise, with consistently positive feedback on punctuality, communication, and workmanship quality. However, pricing presents a notable concern: while most reviews praise reasonable rates, one detailed 2024 review documents a significant billing dispute ($800 invoice for under 30 minutes of work, later reduced to $425 after escalation), revealing potential issues with hourly minimums and transparent cost communication. The contractor's skill level and reliability are well-established across 12+ mentions, but the pricing dimension is weakened by this substantial negative incident, resulting in a moderate score despite general affordability claims elsewhere.

• PRICING CONCERN: One detailed June 2024 review documents a major billing dispute—$800 invoice for approximately 30 minutes of work, later reduced to $425 after customer escalation and third-party intervention. The reviewer explicitly warns others to confirm total costs and hourly minimums in advance. This contradicts the 'reasonable pricing' narrative in other reviews and suggests potential lack of transparency on billing terms.
• REVIEW COMPOSITION: 19 of 20 reviews are 5-star ratings with predominantly positive language. The single 3-star review is highly detailed and credible, but the overwhelming 5-star concentration warrants caution. However, the detailed nature of most positive reviews (specific job descriptions, personal anecdotes, named individuals) suggests authenticity rather than fake reviews.
• RECENCY BIAS: 11 of 20 reviews are from 2024 (past 12 months), providing good recent data. However, 4 reviews are from 2022–2023, which are older but still relevant. The June 2024 billing dispute is recent and material.
• PRICING DATA LIMITATION: Only 9 mentions of pricing across 20 reviews. Most positive reviews mention 'reasonable' or 'fair' pricing without specifics. The single detailed pricing complaint carries disproportionate weight due to its specificity and credibility, but sample size for pricing is smaller than other dimensions.

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable for assessing professionalism, completion, and expertise (all HIGH confidence), but should be interpreted with caution regarding pricing due to a documented billing dispute that contradicts general affordability claims; customers should explicitly confirm hourly rates and minimums before engaging services.

Angel and Camex Electric receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with the vast majority of reviewers praising his punctuality, communication, friendly demeanor, and responsiveness — including same-day and weekend availability. Pricing is consistently described as fair, competitive, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting he came in lower than competitors or honored original quotes even when scope expanded. Project completion is strong, with numerous accounts of jobs finished on time or ahead of schedule, follow-through on callbacks, and going beyond original scope without extra charges. However, two 1-star reviews meaningfully temper the scores: one describes gross negligence on a panel upgrade project — including unauthorized work by an unsupervised brother, near-severing of a gas line, code violations, destruction of property, and difficulty obtaining a refund — while the other is brief but alleges unqualified work. These two negative reviews, particularly the detailed 2018 account, introduce meaningful risk signals that prevent top-tier scores across all dimensions.

• SERIOUS NEGATIVE FLAG: One detailed 1-star review (2018-03-07) describes a major incident involving unauthorized work performed by Angel's brother without supervision, near-severing of a gas line, code violations, property damage, and difficulty recovering prepaid funds. This is a significant safety and professionalism concern that materially impacts project completion and experience scores.
• SECOND NEGATIVE REVIEW: A brief 1-star review (2021-02-03) alleges 'unqualified work' and suggests the license should be revoked. No specifics are provided, limiting its evidentiary weight, but it corroborates that not all customers have had positive outcomes.
• RECENCY NOTE: The serious 1-star incident occurred in 2018. The majority of reviews since 2020 are positive, suggesting possible improvement over time, but the 2018 incident cannot be dismissed given its severity.
• POSSIBLE FAKE REVIEW CONCERN (MINOR): The 2018 negative reviewer specifically alleges that Angel posted fake reviews about himself on Porch.com. While this cannot be verified from the Yelp reviews alone, the reviewer's claim warrants noting. The Yelp reviews themselves do not show obvious identical phrasing or clear fabrication patterns, but the volume of all-5-star reviews with no detail in some cases (e.g., 2021-08-05, 2021-12-08) is mildly suspicious.
• RECENCY DISTRIBUTION: Reviews span 2018–2024. The most recent reviews (2023–2024) are all positive and detailed, which is a favorable signal. Older reviews (2018–2019) include the most serious negative incident.
• NO BBB ACCREDITATION: The 2018 negative reviewer noted the absence of BBB accreditation after a decade in business. This is an external flag that cannot be verified from reviews alone but is worth noting for due diligence.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews (50) with strong mention counts across all dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence in the scoring framework; however, the presence of one highly detailed and credible 1-star review describing a serious safety incident and project failure means prospective customers should treat this score as a strong-but-not-unconditional endorsement and conduct additional due diligence, particularly for complex or high-stakes projects.