Find Nearby Plumbers In Riverside, California

Carbajal Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with mentions of punctuality, friendliness, clear communication, and accommodating service across all four reviews. Project completion is solid with multiple emergency and complex jobs (boiler, heater, shower, toilet, garbage disposal) completed successfully. Technical expertise is evident through quick diagnostics and efficient repairs. Pricing is mentioned positively in only 2 reviews as 'affordable' and 'reasonable,' limiting confidence in this dimension. All reviews are recent (within past 12 months) and highly detailed with specific examples.

• All 4 reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback or complaints — this is atypical and warrants caution
• Repetitive phrasing across reviews ('Omar is your guy,' emphasis on trustworthiness and dependability) suggests possible review clustering or similar customer base
• Limited sample size (n=4) means scores should be treated as preliminary; recommend collecting more reviews for robust assessment
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; insufficient data to confidently assess value proposition

This WW Score of 89.3 should be treated as a preliminary indicator rather than a definitive assessment. The small sample size (4 reviews), absence of any negative feedback, and clustering of 5-star ratings limit confidence. The score reflects genuine strengths in professionalism and project completion, but additional reviews—particularly any critical feedback—are needed to validate this assessment.

Adrian demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with mentions of punctuality, communication, and courteous demeanor across 4 reviews. Project completion is solid with evidence of timely delivery and thorough follow-through on multiple project types. Technical experience is evident through successful handling of complex work including electrical upgrades and plumbing repairs. Pricing feedback is limited to 2 mentions but both describe fair and transparent rates. The overall WW Score of 88.3 reflects reliable, professional service with strong workmanship.

• All 5 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language and no critical feedback—this pattern warrants caution regarding authenticity
• Review dates span 2020–2023 with 3 of 5 reviews older than 2 years; more recent data would strengthen confidence
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; limited evidence for fair pricing assessment
• Small sample size (5 reviews) limits statistical reliability; recommend collecting additional reviews before major decisions

This score should be treated with moderate caution due to the small sample size, uniformly positive ratings, and age of some reviews; the score is directionally reliable but would benefit from additional recent customer feedback to confirm consistency.

The overwhelming majority of reviews praise this company's professionalism, punctuality, communication, and courteous technicians across a large and diverse team including Josh, Ryan, Brooke, Brian, Jason, Ric, Hugo, Matthew, Dan, and others. Pricing scores are pulled down by a meaningful minority of negative reviews explicitly citing overcharging, surprise charges, and quotes that were significantly higher than competitors or industry norms — including a $2,000 quote for a gas line job, a $1,460 charge that left gas still leaking, a $660 toilet wax seal job quoted at $280, and a $326 charge for a 10-minute repair. Project completion scores reflect a strong general record of jobs finished on time and correctly, but are tempered by several credible complaints of incomplete work, failure to follow through on callbacks, abandoned jobs, and at least one instance where a repair did not resolve the underlying issue after multiple visits. Experience scores are high overall, with many reviewers specifically praising technical skill and problem-solving, though a small number of reviews describe botched work, improper installations, and a technician who lacked equipment to properly test gas lines.

• Several reviews appear to be near-duplicate submissions: two reviews dated 2024-09-03 are nearly word-for-word identical ('Amazing service from Bob the Plumber Inc...'), and two reviews dated 2022-07-19 are nearly identical ('Just wanted to share with others that Bob the plumber was very pleasing...'). These may be duplicate submissions or coordinated reviews and have been treated with reduced weight.
• Two reviews dated 2021-02-25 appear to be from the same customer describing the same negative experience with gas line work, submitted on the same date — one with text and one without. Counted as one incident.
• A significant number of reviews (49+) contain no review text and only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable qualitative data.
• Reviews span from 2005 to 2025, a 20-year window. The business appears to have changed ownership at least once (original 'Bob' retired, replaced by Ryan and Brooke under the same brand name in one market, while the Bertolino brand operates separately). This suggests the reviews may reflect multiple distinct business entities operating under similar or shared branding, which could distort the aggregate score.
• Pricing complaints are credible and specific, not vague. Multiple 1-star and 2-star reviews cite exact dollar amounts and describe surprise charges, bait-and-switch pricing, or rates far above market. This pattern is notable enough to meaningfully suppress the pricing score.
• One review (2020-09-16) alleges the contractor is unlicensed and improperly installed a water heater resulting in a red tag from the gas company. A separate 2011 review also alleges no license and no insurance. These are serious allegations that could not be verified from reviews alone but are flagged as a significant concern.
• One review (2013-02-17) describes a detailed and specific pattern of substandard work, incomplete rough-in, drain installed in the wrong location, and the contractor 'marking' work by painting a city water access cover blue — a practice the city confirmed receiving complaints about. This is a credible and specific negative flag.
• Recency note: The majority of reviews with substantive text are from 2022 onward, which is positive for score reliability. However, the negative reviews are distributed across the full timeline, suggesting recurring issues rather than isolated incidents.

This WW Score is based on a very large review set (320 total, 271 with usable data) spanning 20 years and carries HIGH statistical confidence in its directional accuracy, but users should note that the reviews likely reflect multiple business entities or ownership periods operating under shared branding, that pricing complaints are specific and recurring enough to be treated as a genuine pattern rather than outliers, and that serious allegations regarding licensing and workmanship quality — while unverified — warrant independent verification before hiring.

Anthony's Plumbing earns strong marks for professionalism and experience, with the vast majority of reviewers praising courteous, knowledgeable technicians who communicate well, arrive on time, and go above and beyond. Project completion is also generally solid, with most jobs finished same-day or within the promised timeframe, though a meaningful cluster of negative reviews describes work that failed shortly after completion and a company unwilling to honor callbacks or warranties — a significant drag on this dimension. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many customers describe rates as fair or affordable, a notable and recurring pattern of complaints cites prices as outrageous, bait-and-switch quoting (phone quote vs. on-site quote), and charges perceived as exploitative — particularly for elderly or emergency customers. The score reflects a genuinely capable and often excellent service operation that is undermined by inconsistent pricing practices and occasional failures to stand behind completed work.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY PATTERN: Multiple independent reviews across different years describe a significant gap between phone/advertised quotes and on-site prices. Examples include a $69 advertised special ballooning to $600, a $150 phone quote becoming $500 on arrival, and a $55 job becoming $100 on-site. This is a systemic concern, not isolated incidents.
• WARRANTY/CALLBACK FAILURES: At least 4 reviews explicitly describe the company refusing to honor warranty work or return for the same recurring issue within the warranty period, citing being 'too busy' or claiming the warranty had just expired. This materially impacts the project completion score.
• PRICING EXPLOITATION CONCERNS: Multiple reviews describe what they characterize as price gouging of vulnerable customers, including an 80-year-old on a fixed income and a 70-year-old family member charged $1,600 for a 3-hour job. One review describes a $400 charge for a 10-minute job using $5 in parts.
• UPSELLING COMPLAINTS: Several reviews describe technicians recommending unnecessary replacements or expensive services when simpler fixes were all that was needed (e.g., $775 garbage disposal replacement for a loose fitting, $950 toilet flange quote vs. $200 from a competitor, recommending full pipe replacement before checking a simple washer).
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 38 reviews contained no text and only a star rating (mostly 5-star). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data. Their presence slightly inflates the apparent star average.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from 2010 to June 2025. The majority of substantive reviews are from 2022 onward. Older reviews (pre-2018) reflect what appears to be a smaller, owner-operated business; more recent reviews reflect a larger team with multiple named technicians. Scores are weighted toward recent reviews.
• POSSIBLE DUPLICATE REVIEW: The review praising 'Brandon' for water heater phone troubleshooting appears to be posted twice with nearly identical text under different dates (2022-09-10 and 2022-12-20), suggesting a possible duplicate or copied review.
• ONE EXTREME NEGATIVE: One review (2016) contains a profanity-laced alleged response from the owner directed at a female customer. If authentic, this is a serious professionalism concern, though it is a single isolated incident from nearly a decade ago and the overall pattern does not corroborate this behavior.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning 15 years and carries HIGH statistical confidence in its directional accuracy; however, consumers should weight the pricing dimension concerns heavily, as the pattern of quote inflation and warranty refusal is consistent, multi-year, and credible — meaning the true pricing experience may be worse than the score of 63 suggests for customers in urgent or emergency situations.

Pride Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and technical experience, with the vast majority of reviewers praising courteous, knowledgeable technicians who communicate clearly, arrive on time, and complete jobs thoroughly. The company demonstrates consistent follow-through, including honoring warranties, returning for callbacks at no charge, and completing same-day or next-day emergency work. However, pricing is a meaningful and recurring concern: multiple reviewers across different years explicitly describe quotes that were significantly higher than competitors — in some cases 2x to 4x the price — and a handful of negative reviews specifically cite feeling taken advantage of or overcharged for simple jobs. The pricing dimension is the primary drag on the overall WW Score, pulling it down from what would otherwise be a high-80s result. Two blank reviews with no text were excluded from scoring, and one 3-star review with a referral-related caution was noted but not heavily weighted.

• PRICING CONCERN — RECURRING AND CREDIBLE: At least 10 distinct reviews across multiple years explicitly cite pricing as significantly higher than competitors or as unreasonable for the work performed. Specific examples include: $550 quoted for a faucet replacement vs. $150 elsewhere; $470 quoted for a spigot vs. $195 elsewhere; $1,250 quoted for a PRV vs. $750 elsewhere; $2,100 for a water heater vs. ~$650 retail; $285 to snake a sewer line vs. $150-$180 elsewhere; $900 for a pipe repair the reviewer felt was excessive. This is a consistent, multi-year pattern and should be weighted seriously.
• FRAUD/MISDIAGNOSIS ALLEGATION: One 1-star review (July 2024) alleges the technician failed to properly perform a gas leak detection, missed an obvious leak, refused to access visible piping, and recommended an unnecessary $10,000 repipe when the actual repair cost under $2,000. The reviewer stated they were pursuing a refund and considering reporting to the CSLB. This is a serious allegation and was not publicly resolved in the review thread.
• UNRESOLVED COMPLAINT: One 2-star review (July 2023) describes a dishwasher issue that was not resolved after a steep-priced service call, with the original problem recurring two days later.
• QUOTE TRANSPARENCY CONCERN: Multiple reviews note that Pride does not provide estimates over the phone and charges a service fee ($49-$89) just to come out and quote, which several reviewers felt was a pressure tactic to prevent comparison shopping. This is a structural business practice worth flagging for consumers.
• TWO BLANK REVIEWS: Two reviews contained no text (only a 5-star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• REVIEW VOLUME AND RECENCY: The majority of reviews are from 2023-2025, providing strong recency weighting. Older reviews (2016-2020) are consistent in tone and do not contradict the current pattern. No fake review patterns detected — reviews are highly specific, name individual technicians, and include both positive and negative experiences with concrete details.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and highly specific review set spanning nearly a decade, with strong recency weighting and credible negative reviews that prevent score inflation — the score of 79.4 should be considered a reliable and conservative representation of Pride Plumbing's overall service quality, with the primary caveat being that pricing practices are a documented and recurring concern that prospective customers should investigate before committing to work.

5 Star Plumbing earns strong marks for professionalism and responsiveness, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers praising punctuality, courteous technicians, clear communication, and respectful behavior in the home such as wearing shoe covers. Project completion scores well overall, as most jobs were finished same-day or next-day, but is tempered by a meaningful cluster of negative reviews describing abandoned work, unreturned calls, incomplete repairs, and at least one serious multi-day emergency failure over a holiday weekend. Experience scores solidly, with many reviewers specifically praising named technicians for accurate diagnosis, skilled repairs, and honest assessments that saved customers money — though a handful of reviews describe inexperienced or incompetent work. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many customers found costs fair and transparent, a notable number of reviews explicitly flagged overcharging, prices significantly higher than competitors, undisclosed fees, and at least one case where a manager had to intervene to correct an inflated charge. The spread between glowing and critical reviews across all dimensions prevents a top-tier score.

• 15 reviews contain no text at all — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Several reviews from 2025-06-01 and 2025-06-07 share the same date stamp with minimal or no text, which may indicate bulk submission or review solicitation. Confidence in the most recent review cluster is slightly reduced.
• One 1-star review (2023-01-26) alleges the company also operates under the name 'Underbudget Plumbing' and describes it as a shady husband-and-wife operation. This could not be verified from other reviews but is flagged as a potential identity concern.
• One 5-star review (2020-06-08) explicitly states the reviewer is leaving 5 stars only to protect the company's rating despite being dissatisfied — this review was scored on its content, not its star rating, and reflects a pricing complaint.
• Multiple negative reviews describe serious failures: abandoned emergency jobs, work left incomplete, tools and caps left behind, a flooded senior citizen left without water for days, and a $12,000 sewer job that allegedly caused ongoing damage. These are not isolated incidents and meaningfully suppress the project completion and experience scores.
• Review corpus spans from 2010 to 2025. Reviews older than 2022 were given reduced weight as they may reflect a different team, ownership era, or service area. The majority of scoreable data comes from 2023–2025.
• Some technician names (Eze, Adam, Amir, Edris, Christian) appear repeatedly with strong praise, while others (Jason, Khalil in one instance, Fernando in one instance) appear in negative reviews. Quality appears technician-dependent, which is a reliability risk.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning multiple years and carries HIGH statistical confidence, but the presence of recurring serious complaints about incomplete work, pricing disputes, and abandoned jobs means the score should be interpreted as an average across an inconsistent service experience rather than a reliable floor of quality.