Find Nearby Plumbers In Riverside, California

A&A Plumbing & Rooter Service demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four scored dimensions, supported by a large and detailed review base spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently mentioned dimension, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers praising punctuality, courtesy, and communication — though three negative reviews specifically cite unresponsiveness and a dismissive attitude from owner August, which moderately tempers the score. Pricing is frequently described as fair, reasonable, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting A&A came in lower than competitors and honored original quotes, though this dimension scores slightly below the others due to the small number of negative signals around a credit card surcharge and one reviewer who felt pricing was high for an emergency call. Project completion scores are strong, with nearly all reviewers reporting jobs finished same-day or next-day, callbacks honored, and follow-through on complex multi-day jobs like full re-pipes and septic overhauls. Experience scores are high, with numerous reviewers specifically calling out technicians' diagnostic accuracy, technical knowledge, and willingness to explore less invasive solutions before recommending costly repairs.

• Three 1-star reviews exist in the dataset citing unresponsiveness, ignored texts, and a rude interaction with owner August — these are credible negative signals and were factored into the professionalism score.
• A large proportion of reviews are 5-star with no negative feedback, which could suggest some selection bias, but the reviews contain sufficient specific detail (named technicians, described problems, job specifics) to be considered largely authentic.
• Approximately 40% of reviews are older than 3 years (pre-2022), which reduces their weight in scoring. The most recent reviews (2022–2024) remain consistently positive, suggesting quality has been maintained.
• Several reviews mention the same technicians repeatedly (Jesse, Jason, Jay, Sergio, August), which is consistent with a small team and does not indicate fake review activity — specificity of detail supports authenticity.
• One review (2017-08-04, 1-star) describes the owner speaking dismissively to a customer who was unfamiliar with septic systems. This is a notable professionalism concern involving the owner directly.

This WW Score is based on 75 reviews with a high volume of detailed, specific, and credible feedback across all four dimensions, making it a reliable representation of this contractor's overall service quality as of mid-2024.

PVP Plumbing and Ricardo consistently receive strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, fast response times, friendly communication, and cleanliness. Project completion scores are also high, with multiple reviewers noting same-day service, jobs finished in a single visit, follow-through on callbacks, and persistence on complex multi-day jobs. Pricing is described as reasonable, fair, and transparent across numerous reviews, with at least one reviewer noting the final price closely matched the phone estimate. Experience and workmanship are affirmed by several reviewers who noted technical knowledge, proper code compliance, accurate diagnosis, and quality results. The one notable deduction across dimensions stems from two identical duplicate reviews (same reviewer, same text, same date), which slightly reduces data reliability.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews dated 2024-01-26 are word-for-word identical (kitchen sink clog / Martin / 2:53pm). This appears to be a duplicate submission, not a separate reviewer. Only one instance was counted in scoring.
• ALL REVIEWS ARE 5-STAR: Every single review is rated 5.0 with no negative or mixed feedback. While the reviews contain specific details and named individuals which reduce fake review suspicion, the complete absence of any critical feedback warrants mild caution.
• REVIEW AGE SPREAD: Reviews span from 2020 to 2024. The most recent reviews (2023–2024) remain consistent in tone and quality with older ones, suggesting sustained performance rather than a decline. However, approximately half the reviews are older than 24 months.
• GENERIC REVIEWS NOTED: A small number of reviews (e.g., 'Highly recommend PVP Plumbing! Exceptional service, great customer service and quick response time!') lack specific detail and contribute limited scoring evidence. These were weighted conservatively.

This WW Score is based on 26 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, yielding HIGH confidence overall — however, the all-5-star rating pattern, one confirmed duplicate review, and a handful of generic low-detail reviews introduce a small degree of caution, and the true score may be marginally lower than reported.

All Plumbing & Air Solutions earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning multiple years. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courteous technicians, and same-day responsiveness. Pricing is consistently described as competitive, fair, and transparent — with multiple reviewers noting they compared quotes and found this company the most affordable. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as fully resolved, often same-day or next-day, though three notable negative reviews cite a delayed warranty report submission, an inability to schedule within a reasonable timeframe, and repeated failed callbacks — which meaningfully temper this score. Experience is well-supported, with reviewers frequently citing technician skill, thorough diagnostics, problem-solving on complex jobs, and educational explanations, including one detailed multi-day slab and shower rebuild that drew exceptional praise.

• A cluster of approximately 20 reviews share the exact date '2022-06-10 00:00:00', which is highly irregular and suggests these may have been bulk-imported, backdated, or otherwise manipulated. Several of these reviews are extremely brief (e.g., 'Very helpful', 'They are simply the best!', 'Super professional! Great quality service! 10/10 recommended!') with no specific details, which is consistent with fake or incentivized review patterns.
• Five reviews contain no text at all — only a star rating (all 5-star). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• The suspicious '2022-06-10' cluster reviews were still included in scoring where they contained explicit dimension-relevant content, but their generic nature was factored into conservative scoring. Confidence is maintained at HIGH due to the large volume of clearly genuine, detailed reviews outside this cluster.
• Three negative reviews (ratings of 1 or 2) were identified: one citing a 9-day delay in submitting a warranty report leaving a customer without hot water for over 2 weeks; one citing repeated inability to handle inquiries across multiple contacts; and one citing a 5-day wait time for an emergency hot water heater situation. These were weighted into the project_completion and professionalism scores.
• One 2-star review from 2018 describes workmanship issues caused by an inexperienced technician, including a new leak created during service and a loss of hot water after the visit, with slow callback resolution. This was factored into the experience and project_completion scores.
• Recency note: The majority of detailed, clearly genuine reviews are from 2019–2024, with strong representation in the past 12 months (2024). The score is considered current and reliable.

This WW Score is based on a large, multi-year review dataset with strong dimension coverage across all four categories; however, the reliability is moderately tempered by a suspicious cluster of undated bulk reviews on 2022-06-10 and five content-free reviews, meaning the true score could be marginally lower if those reviews are inauthentic.

Cesar and his team receive consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight responsiveness, punctuality, courteous communication, and same-day or next-day availability. Pricing is a notable differentiator, with multiple reviewers explicitly comparing quotes from competitors and finding Cesar significantly more affordable, transparent, and honest about options. Project completion scores well overall, with most jobs described as finished quickly and thoroughly, though one 3-star review from 2022 documents a failure to resolve a clog after charging $350, which tempers the score modestly. Experience and workmanship are praised across a wide range of job types — from complex slab pipe replacement and pipe bursting to water heater installs and shower valve repairs — with several reviewers specifically calling out Cesar's technical knowledge and problem-solving ability.

• A disproportionate number of reviews are 5-star (19 out of 21), which warrants mild scrutiny, though most reviews contain specific job details, named technicians, and varied language that reduces the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• Several reviews are brief and generic (e.g., 'Courteous. Efficient. Fair price. Will use again.' and 'Excellent Service. Would recommend them to all.') with no job-specific detail, which limits their evidentiary value and they were weighted accordingly.
• The majority of reviews (approximately 15 out of 21) are dated 2021–2022, with only 3 reviews from 2023–2024. The most recent review is from May 2024. Recency coverage is moderate but not fully current — performance trends over the past 12 months are based on limited data.
• One negative data point: a 3-star review from September 2022 describes an unresolved clog after $350 in charges, with the job ultimately completed by a different plumber. This was factored into project completion and pricing scores.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence given 21 reviews with strong specificity across all four dimensions, though the skew toward older reviews (2021–2022) and the high proportion of 5-star ratings mean the score should be treated as a reliable but not fully current representation of performance.

Bad Drains Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, clear communication, courteous attitudes, and responsiveness including same-day service. Pricing is explicitly called out as fair, reasonable, or better than competitors in the majority of reviews, with one reviewer even confirming this through independent estimates. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished quickly, thoroughly, and without issue, including a complex pipe replacement completed in under five hours. Experience and workmanship are affirmed through references to skillful repairs on old and complex plumbing systems, root intrusion, cast iron pipe replacement, and hydro-jet service. The score is tempered slightly by the fact that a significant portion of reviews are older than 12 months, with only four reviews dated within the past 12 months.

• Majority of reviews (11 of 15) are older than 12 months, with several dating back to 2018–2020. More recent performance may differ from historical patterns.
• All 15 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback present. While individual reviews contain specific details that reduce fake review suspicion, the complete absence of any critical feedback warrants mild caution.
• Two different business name references appear across reviews ('Bad Drains Plumbing', 'Slow Drains Plumbing', 'LA Sewer Masters'). This may indicate rebranding or review aggregation across related entities, which could affect score reliability.
• No reviews mention any negative experience, callback issue, or incomplete work. While this is positive, the uniformity slightly reduces confidence in the dataset representing a full picture of customer experience.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high reliability due to strong mention counts across all dimensions and specific, detailed reviewer language, but is modestly discounted by the predominance of older reviews, universal 5-star ratings with no critical feedback, and inconsistent business name references across the review set.

Mr. G Contractor earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large and consistent body of reviews spanning 2018 through 2024. Professionalism is the most frequently praised attribute, with dozens of reviewers explicitly citing punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting Mr. G undercut other quotes significantly. Project completion scores are high but are modestly tempered by one detailed 3-star review describing Josue's absence during a multi-day bathroom remodel, leaving an inexperienced crew member unsupervised, and one 1-star review citing two no-call, no-show appointments. Workmanship quality is broadly praised across a wide variety of project types, though the 3-star review also noted specific execution errors including uneven fixtures, improper caulking, and a cabinet drilled through incorrectly, preventing a perfect experience score.

• One significant 3-star review (2022-07-01) details project management failures: Josue was largely absent for the first two days of a bathroom remodel, left an under-skilled crew member unsupervised, and multiple workmanship errors occurred that required correction or were left imperfect. This is the most substantive critical review and carries meaningful weight.
• One 1-star review (2019-06-01) reports two consecutive no-call, no-show appointments within a single month — a serious reliability concern that directly impacts professionalism and project completion scores.
• One 3-star review (2021-02-08) notes a communication breakdown that prevented an estimate from being set up, suggesting occasional responsiveness gaps.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with broadly positive but sometimes generic language. However, most reviews include specific project details (project type, named crew members, specific outcomes), which reduces fake review suspicion significantly. No strong fake review pattern detected.
• Approximately 20 reviews predate 2022 and are more than 2 years old. The most recent reviews (2023–2024) remain consistently positive, suggesting sustained quality, but the older reviews carry reduced recency weight.
• Several reviews mention work being done by crew members (brother, Eric, Jerome, Carlos, Ismael) rather than Josue directly. Quality appears to vary depending on who is on-site, as evidenced by the detailed 3-star review.

This WW Score is based on 65 reviews spanning approximately six years with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, making it a HIGH confidence assessment — however, prospective customers should weigh the documented no-show incident and the detailed 3-star remodel review, which suggest that quality and reliability can vary when Josue is not personally present on the job.