Find Nearby Plumbers In Modesto, California

Evan's Handyman Co. demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise, with 48 mentions of punctuality, communication, and courteous behavior earning an 82.5 score. However, significant concerns emerge around project completion and pricing. Multiple reviews document incomplete work, failure to return for callbacks, and unfinished jobs (shed assembly, exhaust fan installation, kitchen light repairs). Pricing practices are questioned in several reviews, with complaints about charges for minimal work and lack of transparency. While experience and workmanship quality are consistently praised (85.0 score), the pattern of follow-through failures and responsiveness issues substantially impacts overall reliability.

• CRITICAL: Multiple reviews (at least 5) document serious project completion failures including abandoned work, failure to return for callbacks, and incomplete installations. This is a major red flag.
• CRITICAL: Responsiveness issues appear in at least 6 reviews spanning 2021-2024, with customers reporting no return calls, delayed estimates, and ghosting after payment. This is a recurring pattern.
• Pricing concerns: Review from 2024-10-03 describes charging $400 for less than 20 minutes of work with no actual service performed. Another review (2024-06-19) criticizes high pricing for poor-quality shed assembly.
• Inconsistency detected: Strong positive reviews (mostly 5-star) contrast sharply with detailed negative reviews documenting specific failures. The negative reviews are highly detailed and credible, not generic complaints.
• Follow-through failures: Multiple customers report Evan agreeing to return for corrections or additional work but failing to do so (exhaust fan, kitchen light, shed assembly, facia boards).
• Recency concern: While many positive reviews exist, several critical negative reviews are recent (2024, 2023), suggesting ongoing issues despite the company's long history.

This WW Score of 76.8 should be treated with caution despite HIGH overall confidence. While the score reflects strong professionalism and expertise metrics, it masks a serious and recurring pattern of project completion failures and responsiveness issues documented across multiple detailed reviews. The company excels at initial contact and technical work but demonstrates poor follow-through on callbacks and corrections. Customers should expect excellent initial service but should be prepared for potential difficulties if work requires follow-up visits or corrections.

ABP All Bay Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism and experience, with the majority of reviewers praising courteous, knowledgeable, and communicative staff. Pricing is consistently described as fair, transparent, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting no hidden costs and even proactive discounts. However, project completion is the weakest dimension: two reviews — one from 2016 and one resolved only after two months and third-party mediation in 2014 — describe incomplete work, broken property, and poor follow-through, which meaningfully drag down that dimension. The bulk of positive reviews are recent (2018–2025), suggesting the business may have improved over time, but the completion failures are serious enough to warrant caution. Overall, the score reflects a contractor with genuine strengths but a documented history of follow-through issues that prospective customers should be aware of.

• Two reviews (2014, 2016) describe significant project completion failures: one involved a water heater replacement left incomplete for over a week with messy workmanship, and another required a third-party mediator and two months to resolve a broken toilet replacement. These are serious red flags for the project completion dimension.
• Several positive reviews are older than 3 years (2015–2019), and two are older than 5 years (2014, 2015). Recency weighting was applied — more recent reviews (2024–2025) were given greater influence on scores.
• Some positive reviews are brief and generic (e.g., 'Top notch work, professional representation, fair pricing!' and 'They did fabulous remodeling on both our bathrooms.') with no specific detail. These were counted but treated as lower-evidential-weight data points.
• No strong fake review pattern detected overall, but the two very short generic 5-star reviews from March 2025 warrant mild scrutiny due to lack of specifics.

This WW Score is based on 15 reviews spanning 2014–2025 with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions, making it statistically reasonable, though the presence of two serious completion failures and a handful of low-detail reviews means the score should be treated as a fair but not definitive assessment of current performance.

Motherflushers Plumbing earns strong marks for professionalism and responsiveness, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers praising punctuality, courteous technicians, and fast response times — often within an hour. Project completion is generally solid, with most jobs described as fully resolved, though two notable negative reviews cite incomplete or incorrect work requiring a second plumber, and one review describes a complete failure to respond via their after-hours AI system. Pricing is the most contested dimension: while several reviewers praise affordability and fair pricing, at least four reviews explicitly call out overcharging, hidden fees, or bait-and-switch estimates — including a $325 snake job quoted at $100, and a $648 toilet wax seal job that allegedly was never completed. Experience scores well overall, with multiple reviewers citing knowledgeable, skilled technicians who solved complex problems, but is tempered by at least one instance of incorrect workmanship. The WW Score reflects a genuinely capable company with a meaningful and recurring pricing transparency problem.

• PRICING CONCERN: At least 4 reviews explicitly describe pricing as deceptive or significantly above quote — including a $100-to-$325 snake job bait-and-switch, a $325 charge for a service most plumbers charge $85–$150 for, and a $648 charge for work allegedly not completed. This is a statistically significant pattern across the review set.
• WORKMANSHIP FAILURE: One review (2020-10-13) states the plumber did not fix the job correctly and a second plumber had to be called. Another review (2022-05-27) describes paying $648 for toilet wax seals that were never actually replaced, confirmed by a subsequent plumber.
• AFTER-HOURS SYSTEM FAILURE: One review (2024-10-13) describes the 24-hour AI phone system hanging up on the customer mid-conversation with no callback, resulting in lost business and a 1-star rating.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK — LOW TO MODERATE: Several 5-star reviews are brief and generic (e.g., 'Great service and speedy service better than any other plumbing company. Very helpful and kind') with no specific details. However, the majority of positive reviews do include named technicians, specific job types, and situational detail, which reduces the likelihood of widespread fabrication. Confidence is not significantly reduced but noted.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from 2020 to 2024. The most recent reviews (2023–2024) are generally positive, but the pricing complaints are distributed across multiple years including 2020, 2022, 2023, and 2024, suggesting the pricing issue is not isolated to an older period and may be ongoing.

This WW Score is based on 43 reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and is considered moderately reliable, though the recurring pricing transparency complaints and at least two documented workmanship failures introduce meaningful downward risk that prospective customers should weigh carefully.

Always Rescue Plumbing earns strong marks for responsiveness, communication, and same-day availability, which are consistently praised across the majority of reviews. However, a meaningful cluster of 1-star and low-rated reviews raises serious concerns across all four dimensions: multiple customers report incomplete work, warranty refusals, upselling pressure, misdiagnosis, and unexpected charges not disclosed upfront. Pricing is a mixed picture — many reviewers praise competitive quotes, but several credible negative reviews describe significant overcharging, hidden fees, credit card surcharges, and bait-and-switch pricing tactics. Project completion is the most penalized dimension, with at least five reviews describing jobs left unfinished, callbacks ignored, or problems recurring shortly after service. Experience scores are dragged down by documented misdiagnoses and poor workmanship in a minority but notable share of reviews.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple credible reviews allege overcharging (e.g., $650 for a washer valve replacement, $500 for garbage disposal at maximum allowable rate, $250 for a single snake pass), hidden fees, and credit card surcharges not disclosed in quotes.
• PROJECT COMPLETION FAILURES: At least 5 reviews describe jobs left incomplete, recurring problems after service, warranty refusals, or technicians leaving without notifying the customer — including one detailed account of two holes left in a wall with a demand for $450 more to finish.
• WARRANTY DISPUTES: At least 2 reviews explicitly describe the company refusing to honor stated warranties, which is a significant trust and reliability concern.
• UPSELLING PATTERN: Multiple independent reviewers (1-star and 2-star) describe a consistent pattern of technicians exaggerating scope, changing their diagnosis mid-job, and pushing expensive replacements when simpler fixes were sufficient — corroborated by follow-up service from other companies.
• MISDIAGNOSIS: At least 2 reviews describe incorrect diagnoses (e.g., declaring a dishwasher broken when it was clogged; recommending full toilet replacement for a minor flush issue) that were later corrected cheaply by other plumbers.
• OWNER RESPONSE CREDIBILITY: One reviewer explicitly disputes the owner's public response to their review, alleging the owner fabricated details of a negotiation. This raises concerns about the reliability of owner rebuttals.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews with dates fall within 2022–2025, giving the dataset reasonable recency. A small number of reviews have no date and cannot be weighted for recency.
• NO FAKE REVIEW FLAG: Review language is sufficiently varied and specific across the dataset. No strong pattern of fake reviews detected, though the high volume of brief 5-star reviews with minimal detail slightly reduces confidence in the positive tail.
• UNDATED REVIEWS: Approximately 20 reviews have no date attached. These were included in scoring but could not be weighted for recency.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse review set with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, but the score should be interpreted cautiously given a consistent and credible pattern of serious complaints about pricing transparency, warranty honoring, and job completion that cannot be dismissed as outliers.

Johnny's Plumbing demonstrates strong technical expertise and professionalism from individual technicians, with many recent reviews (2025) praising specific workers like Gabriel, Eddie Vargas, and Jeff for their knowledge, politeness, and efficiency. However, the company is significantly hampered by chronic office management and customer service failures, including rude receptionists, missed appointments, no-shows, poor communication, and unresponsiveness to callbacks. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though some older reviews cite dramatic quote increases and billing disputes. Project completion is inconsistent—while many jobs are finished promptly and thoroughly, there are documented cases of incomplete work, callbacks required to fix initial mistakes, and abandoned projects. The stark contrast between positive technician-level reviews and negative office/management reviews suggests systemic organizational dysfunction despite individual worker competence.

• CRITICAL: Severe office management and customer service issues documented across multiple years (2012-2022). Receptionist 'Brianna' and unnamed office staff repeatedly described as rude, unprofessional, and hostile in at least 6 separate reviews.
• PATTERN: Multiple no-show and missed appointment complaints spanning 2015-2022, indicating scheduling/communication breakdown at organizational level.
• PATTERN: Significant number of negative reviews (15+ one-star ratings) concentrated in 2012-2018 period, with some improvement in recent years (2021-2025), but office issues persist.
• CONCERN: Recent reviews (June 2025) show only 5-star ratings with minimal detail and some empty review text fields (3 blank reviews rated 5.0), suggesting possible review manipulation or incomplete data entry.
• INCONSISTENCY: Owner 'Johnny' receives individual praise for honesty and professionalism in older reviews, but is also cited as dismissive and unwilling to address customer complaints in 2018 reviews.
• QUALITY CONTROL: Multiple documented cases of incorrect diagnoses, incomplete repairs requiring callbacks, and work that had to be redone by competitors (2015-2018 period).
• RECENCY BIAS: Overwhelming majority of recent reviews (2025, 2024, 2023) are 5-star with generic praise, while detailed negative reviews are older (2012-2018). This temporal pattern warrants caution.

This WW Score of 72.8 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the score reflects genuine high-quality technical work from field technicians, it masks severe and persistent organizational dysfunction in office management and customer service that directly impacts customer experience and project completion. The recent flood of 5-star reviews lacks specificity and may not fully represent current operational reality. Customers should expect excellent workmanship but should prepare for potential communication, scheduling, and responsiveness challenges with the office.

City Water Filter demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise, with technicians consistently praised for punctuality, politeness, and efficiency. However, the company is significantly undermined by serious project completion and pricing issues. Multiple customers report unresolved leaks, installation failures (reversed connections, improper mounting), and unresponsive follow-up after service calls. Pricing complaints are substantial, with customers reporting dramatic quote increases, lack of transparency, and aggressive billing practices. The company's warranty and callback responsiveness appear inconsistent, with some customers receiving excellent support while others face months of unresolved issues and poor communication.

• CRITICAL: Pattern of installation defects — multiple independent reports of reversed water softener connections, improper wall mounting, resin bead leakage, and leak detector failures suggest systemic quality control problems in installation work.
• CRITICAL: Callback and warranty issues — numerous customers report unresolved leaks, failed follow-up appointments, rescheduling without notice, and refusal to honor warranty claims. One customer waited months with a leaking system.
• CRITICAL: Pricing transparency and aggressive practices — multiple reports of quotes doubling after initial assessment, lack of itemized breakdowns, refusal to negotiate, and aggressive/rude owner responses to price inquiries. One customer charged $420 for $80 in filters.
• CRITICAL: Owner behavior — multiple reviews describe Clay (owner) as defensive, blame-shifting, rude, and unwilling to take responsibility. Several customers report aggressive text messages and dismissive responses to legitimate complaints.
• MODERATE: Potential review manipulation — one customer explicitly states 'Half the good reviews here are because they ask for it in return for three bags of softener salt' and another mentions 'he incentivizes good reviews on Yelp for employee bonuses.' This suggests possible review farming.
• MODERATE: Inconsistent service quality — stark contrast between highly positive reviews (mostly routine filter changes by Fernando, Devan, Chris) and negative reviews (installation, repairs, warranty issues). Suggests excellent routine maintenance but poor installation and problem-solving.
• MODERATE: Recency bias — most 5-star reviews are from 2023-2024 routine filter changes. Most serious complaints span 2022-2024 and involve installation, repairs, and warranty disputes, suggesting systemic issues persist.
• LIMITED: One customer claims the company does not respond to or care about negative reviews, yet the owner has posted detailed responses to multiple 1-star reviews, contradicting this claim.

This WW Score of 72.8 should be treated with caution despite HIGH overall confidence. While the score reflects genuine strengths in routine professionalism and technical knowledge, it masks critical weaknesses in installation quality, project completion, and pricing transparency that disproportionately affect customer satisfaction. The company excels at routine filter replacement but fails significantly at complex installations, warranty support, and post-service problem resolution. Customers should expect excellent routine maintenance but should be aware of substantial risks regarding installation quality, pricing disputes, and callback responsiveness.