Find Nearby Plumbers In Los Angeles, California

Plumbing Boys has an exceptionally strong and consistent track record across all four scored dimensions, supported by a very large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and courteous behavior from both the owner Tony and individual technicians. Pricing is frequently described as fair, reasonable, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting that final charges matched quoted prices and that the company declined to charge for minor visits or no-fault call-outs. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers consistently describing jobs finished correctly, on time, and with follow-up calls from Tony afterward. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across complex jobs including full repiping, main line replacement, hydro-jetting, water heater installation, and pressure regulator work, with several reviewers noting that Plumbing Boys succeeded where other plumbers had failed.

• Two reviews (dated 2024-09-05 and 2024-09-11) are near-identical in wording, structure, and content, differing only by a few days in date. This is a strong indicator of a duplicated or potentially fake review and both were discounted in scoring.
• Two reviews (dated 2023-11-01 and 2024-06-08) are also near-identical in wording, referencing the same technician (Levon) and the same scenario. These appear to be the same review submitted twice and were treated as one data point.
• Three reviews contain no usable text (blank body, rating only) and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• Two 1-star reviews (2020-06-09 and 2016-06-10) describe negative experiences with a Plumbing Boys vehicle (littering, aggressive driving) rather than plumbing service quality. These do not reflect on workmanship or service delivery and were excluded from dimension scoring but noted here as reputational flags.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with no negative service feedback. While the volume and specificity of reviews lend credibility, the near-absence of any critical service feedback warrants mild caution. No score inflation was applied, but this pattern is noted.
• A significant number of reviews predate 2023 and carry reduced weight per recency rules. However, the post-2023 review volume is still very high (60+ reviews), so overall confidence remains HIGH.

This WW Score is highly reliable and based on one of the largest and most detailed review sets possible, with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, consistent specificity in reviewer descriptions, and a recency-weighted dataset that remains robust even after excluding duplicates and blank entries.

Right Price Rooter and Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — punctuality, responsiveness, courteous communication, and follow-through are mentioned in the vast majority of reviews. Pricing is a standout strength, with numerous reviewers explicitly noting that this company came in as the lowest or most competitive bid, often beating multiple other quotes, and with no reports of hidden charges or upselling. Project completion scores are strong but are modestly tempered by two notable negative reviews: one describing a no-show after two scheduled appointments and a failure to fix a bathtub after a burst pipe repair, and another describing a failure to call back and being told they were fully booked. Experience and technical skill are praised frequently, with specific mentions of creative problem-solving, accurate diagnosis, and high-quality workmanship on complex jobs including repipes, sewer line replacements, and excavations. The overall picture is of a highly capable and customer-focused company with isolated but real service delivery failures that prevent a perfect score.

• A cluster of reviews dated '2023-06-09 00:00:00' (approximately 8 reviews) share an identical timestamp with no specific time, which may indicate bulk-imported or migrated reviews rather than organically submitted ones. Language and content vary sufficiently across these to suggest they are likely legitimate but migrated from another platform.
• Two reviews (1-star and 2-star) describe serious project completion failures: one customer reported a no-show on two scheduled appointments and inability to reach the company after a burst pipe repair left the bathtub non-functional; another reported being left waiting with no technician arriving for a scheduled appointment. These are meaningful negative signals in an otherwise highly positive review set.
• One 3-star review and one 2-star review reference communication or callback failures, suggesting occasional responsiveness breakdowns despite the general pattern of strong responsiveness praised by most reviewers.
• The overwhelming proportion of 5-star reviews (approximately 101 out of 105) warrants mild scrutiny, though the reviews contain sufficient specificity — named technicians, described job types, unique scenarios — to suggest they are largely authentic rather than fabricated.
• Several older reviews (2016–2019) are included in the dataset. While they support long-term reputation, they are given reduced weight per recency rules. The majority of reviews are from 2022–2024, providing a strong recent data foundation.

This WW Score is based on a large volume of reviews (105 total) spanning multiple years with strong recency, specific detail, and named personnel, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — however, the presence of at least two credible negative reviews describing appointment failures and unresolved work means the score should be treated as reflecting a generally excellent but not flawless service provider.

Randall Plumbing has an overwhelmingly positive review record spanning over a decade, with consistent praise across all four scored dimensions. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting punctuality, clear communication, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is repeatedly described as fair, reasonable, and often significantly lower than competing quotes, with transparent upfront estimates. Project completion scores are strong, with many reviewers noting jobs were finished on time, callbacks were honored, and work held up over years of follow-up use. Experience and skill are highlighted extensively, including praise for diagnosing difficult problems other plumbers missed, handling century-old plumbing, and delivering clean, high-quality workmanship. The score is tempered slightly by a small number of negative reviews citing failure to return calls, one duplicate review, and some older reviews with no substantive detail.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review beginning 'it's really hard to find contractors that do a great job and is honest and trustworthy. luckily, i found randall 5 years ago...' appears twice with nearly identical text, posted on 2024-06-09 and 2024-05-09. This was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• NEAR-DUPLICATE LANGUAGE: Three reviews dated 2017-09-21 share nearly identical phrasing ('Randall is an excellent plumber who speaks in plain language, checks in every step of the way...'). This pattern is suspicious and may indicate coordinated or inauthentic reviews. Confidence slightly reduced for those specific entries.
• DUPLICATE CONTENT: The review beginning 'Randall is exactly what you're looking for in a plumber, honest, thorough, excellent at what he does...' appears in nearly identical form on both 2023-06-10 and 2022-08-03. Counted once for scoring.
• NEGATIVE RESPONSIVENESS SIGNALS: Two reviews (2018-07-05 rated 1-star, 2014-12-17 rated 1-star) explicitly cite failure to return calls or respond. One additional 3-star review (2017-05-05) also cites poor responsiveness. These are a consistent minor pattern and were factored into the professionalism score.
• BLANK OR NEAR-BLANK REVIEWS: Several reviews contain no text (only a rating), including entries from 2020-06-10, 2019-06-11 (two entries), 2015-11-11, 2015-09-21, 2015-06-15, 2015-02-04, and 2014-01-26. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews with substantive detail span 2013 to 2025. Reviews from the past 12 months (2024-2025) are fewer in number but remain consistently positive. The long review history adds credibility but older reviews were weighted slightly less than recent ones.
• ALL 5-STAR PATTERN: The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star. While the volume and specificity of most reviews lend credibility, the near-absence of critical feedback (outside of responsiveness complaints) warrants mild caution.

This WW Score is based on a large volume of reviews spanning over a decade, with high mention counts across all four dimensions and substantial specificity in reviewer descriptions, making it one of the more reliable scores possible — though the presence of a few duplicate or near-duplicate reviews and a pattern of non-response complaints introduce a small degree of caution.

Olson's Plumbing and Rooter demonstrates overwhelmingly strong performance across all four scored dimensions, supported by a very large and detailed review base spanning over a decade with the vast majority of reviews from 2022–2024. Professionalism is the most frequently cited dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, responsiveness, and courteous behavior — including same-day and emergency responses within 30–90 minutes. Pricing receives strong marks as well, with multiple reviewers specifically noting fair and transparent quotes, no upselling, no hidden fees, and instances where the company charged significantly less than competitors or even performed work for free. Project completion is well-documented, with reviewers consistently noting jobs finished on time, callbacks honored promptly, and work completed as agreed even when complications arose. Experience and technical skill are highlighted in numerous reviews, including instances where Olson's correctly diagnosed problems that other companies misdiagnosed or overquoted, demonstrating superior knowledge and problem-solving ability.

• A significant number of reviews share the exact date '2023-06-09 00:00:00' and '2022-06-09 00:00:00', which may indicate batch-imported or migrated reviews rather than organically submitted ones — treat these with moderate caution.
• One review contains no text at all (blank body, 5-star rating, date 2022-06-09) and was excluded from scoring.
• One review is marked 'unknown' with a date of 2014-12-18 and was excluded from scoring.
• One review from 2012 was included but given minimal weight due to age.
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews present, which is statistically unusual for a company with 100+ reviews. While the review content is largely specific and detailed (reducing fake review suspicion), the complete absence of any critical feedback warrants a flag.
• Several reviews use very similar phrasing around themes like 'honest,' 'trustworthy,' and 'no upsell,' which could reflect genuine brand consistency or coached/templated language — no definitive evidence of fabrication but noted.
• The duplicate long-form review about sewer/drain relining (appearing with dates 2024-06-08 and 2023-07-12) appears to be the same review submitted or migrated twice — counted only once for scoring purposes.

This WW Score is based on a large, predominantly recent, and highly detailed review set, giving it HIGH overall reliability — however, the uniform 5-star rating across all reviews and the presence of batch-dated entries introduce a moderate caveat that the score may reflect a curated or selectively published review pool rather than the full range of customer experiences.

California Green Plumbing and owner Raffi receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, responsiveness, friendliness, and clear communication appear in the vast majority of reviews. Pricing is consistently described as fair, reasonable, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting Raffi charged less than quoted or performed minor work for free. Project completion is strong overall, with most jobs described as finished on time and thoroughly, though a small number of reviews (3 negative reviews) raise legitimate concerns about follow-through on callbacks, a worker causing gas leaks, and a faulty valve installation that required repeated follow-up. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across a wide range of job types — from trenchless sewer relining to whole-home repiping — with multiple reviewers noting Raffi succeeded where other plumbers had failed. The score is modestly tempered by the negative reviews, which describe real and specific failures rather than vague dissatisfaction, and by the fact that some reviews date back to 2011–2015, meaning the current service quality may differ from the historical record.

• Three reviews (1-star, 2-star, and 2-star) describe specific and credible failures: ignored callback requests for weeks, a worker causing gas leaks and incomplete dishwasher hookup, and a general decline in workmanship quality over time. These are not vague complaints and meaningfully reduce confidence in perfect scores.
• One 4-star review (2023) describes an initially unsatisfactory drain cleaning outcome that required a follow-up visit to resolve, suggesting occasional quality control issues.
• A significant portion of reviews span 2011–2020, meaning roughly half the review base is more than 4 years old. Recent reviews (2024–2025) remain positive but are fewer in number, so long-term consistency cannot be fully confirmed.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, tone, and detail. Several reviewers explicitly note they rarely write reviews. The presence of negative reviews further supports authenticity.
• One updated review (originally positive, later revised to 2 stars) notes a decline in quality and follow-through over time, which is a meaningful signal about potential inconsistency.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning over a decade, with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the presence of three credible negative reviews describing specific failures — including ignored callbacks, workmanship errors, and a faulty installation — means the score should be treated as a strong but not unconditional endorsement, and prospective customers should confirm current service quality through recent references.

RJ Plumbing, led primarily by John Allen, earns strong scores across all four dimensions based on a large and detailed review set spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, friendliness, and courteous behavior. Pricing is consistently described as fair, competitive, and transparent, with multiple reviewers noting John actively saved them money or advised against unnecessary work. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as finished on time, on budget, and with proper follow-through including callbacks and cleanup — however, two notable negative reviews (a 1-star misdiagnosis resulting in significant extra cost, and a 1-star review involving a flooded basement due to poor workmanship and non-responsiveness from the owner) meaningfully temper this score. Experience scores well given repeated praise for diagnostic skill, specialized knowledge, and elegant solutions, though the 2012 review involving substitute plumbers who failed to complete a fixture installation and the 2021 misdiagnosis review introduce some caution.

• Two serious negative reviews exist: a 2021 review (2-star) describing a misdiagnosis that cost the customer significantly more money, and a 2018 review (1-star) describing a flooded basement caused by poor workmanship on a septic line seal, with the owner accused of non-responsiveness and refusing to address damages — these are substantive complaints that meaningfully affect project completion and experience scores.
• One 2022 review (1-star) explicitly describes repeated non-response to service requests via text and phone, suggesting possible responsiveness issues during certain periods.
• A 2012 review (3-star) describes substitute plumbers who were unable to complete a bathroom fixture installation, requiring a second contractor — this reflects a quality control risk when John is unavailable.
• The review dated 2014-09-04 contains only the text 'unknown' and was excluded from scoring as it provides no usable data.
• The vast majority of reviews are 5-star with highly positive language. While most contain specific details that support authenticity, the uniformly high ratings across a large volume warrant standard awareness. No definitive fake review pattern was detected, but the near-perfect rating distribution is noted.
• Review recency is strong: a significant number of reviews are from 2022–2024, supporting current relevance of the scores. Older reviews (2010–2014) are consistent in tone but given reduced weight per recency rules.
• Multiple technician names appear across reviews (John, Rick, Raul), indicating this is not strictly a one-man operation despite some reviews describing it as such — quality may vary by technician.

This WW Score is based on 95 reviews with a high volume of detailed, specific, and multi-year data, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible; however, the presence of two substantive negative reviews involving workmanship failures and owner non-responsiveness means the score should be treated as a strong but not unconditional endorsement.