Find Nearby Plumbers In Long Beach, California

Amazing Rooter receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight responsiveness, punctuality, clear communication, and courteous behavior from Victor, Luis, and the broader team. Pricing is rated favorably by the large majority of reviewers, with multiple customers explicitly noting they were the most affordable quote received and that no hidden fees were charged; one reviewer did note the price felt steep, which tempers the pricing score slightly. Project completion is a clear strength: jobs are described as completed same-day or within the promised timeframe across a wide range of plumbing tasks, with no reviews citing abandoned or incomplete work. Experience and workmanship are affirmed by numerous reviewers who mention accurate diagnosis, code-compliant installations, efficient execution, and thorough testing after work is done.

• All 26 reviews carry a 5-star rating with zero negative or mixed ratings, which is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews use similarly enthusiastic language ('amazing', 'highly recommend', 'professional') though most include specific job details, names, and dates that reduce the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• One review (2018-01-30) is over 6 years old and was given reduced weight in scoring; the majority of reviews fall within 2022–2024 and are considered current.
• No reviews mention any callbacks for failed work, warranty claims, or disputes — while this is positive, the complete absence of any negative experience across 26 reviews slightly reduces overall confidence in the dataset's representativeness.

This WW Score is based on 26 reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and a majority of reviews dated within the past two years, making it a reasonably reliable indicator of current service quality, though the uniform 5-star rating pattern warrants mild skepticism.

Ramon and Blue Diamond Plumbing receive consistently strong marks across all four dimensions from a small but coherent set of recent reviews. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with every reviewer noting prompt response times, clear communication, friendly attitude, and in several cases same-day or within-the-hour arrival for emergencies. Pricing is praised explicitly by the majority of reviewers, with one customer going so far as to compare multiple quotes and confirm Ramon's price was nearly half of competitors. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished cleanly, areas left tidy, and no mention of callbacks or abandoned work. Experience is evidenced through specific technical references including CCTV sewer inspections, water heater replacement, main valve work, and accurate problem diagnosis, suggesting solid technical competence across a range of plumbing tasks.

• All 8 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback — this warrants mild caution, though the reviews do contain specific job details, named individuals, and varied scenarios which reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Several reviews share structural similarities (emergency call, fast response, fair price, will recommend) which could reflect genuine shared experience or mild review coaching — not conclusive but worth noting.
• Sample size is small (8 reviews total). Scores carry HIGH confidence per the formula but real-world reliability would improve significantly with 20+ reviews.
• All reviews fall within the past 12 months (April 2024 – November 2024), which is a positive recency signal — no outdated data concerns.

This WW Score is reasonably trustworthy given that all reviews are recent, contain specific details, and cover multiple distinct job types, but the small sample size of 8 reviews means the score should be treated as a promising early signal rather than a fully validated assessment.

Pedro and his crew receive consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently and enthusiastically cited quality — every single review references punctuality, friendliness, communication, or attitude in some form. Project completion is also well-supported, with multiple reviewers confirming jobs were finished thoroughly, including emergency calls handled same-day and complex whole-house repiping completed without issue. Experience scores are bolstered by detailed accounts of technical competence on complex jobs such as gas line work, repiping a 100-year-old home, hydrojetting, and tankless water heater servicing. Pricing is mentioned positively in three reviews, with one reviewer noting Pedro offered an alternative that would have cost him business — a strong indicator of honest, non-predatory pricing — though the limited mention count keeps this score conservative.

• All 8 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback — this warrants mild caution, though the reviews contain specific job details, varied writing styles, and unique scenarios that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Two different names are used interchangeably across reviews — 'Pedro' (the owner) and 'Roman' (the business name, Roman Plumbing & Heat) — this is not a red flag but may cause confusion; Pedro appears to be the individual plumber operating under the Roman Plumbing brand.
• Review volume is low (8 reviews total), which limits statistical reliability despite strong individual review quality.
• No reviews are older than approximately 18 months from the most recent date (2024-05-17), and 5 of 8 reviews fall within the past 12 months — recency profile is favorable.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high reliability given the specificity and variety of the reviews, strong recency, and consistent cross-dimensional evidence, though the small total review count (8) means the score should be treated as a strong early signal rather than a fully validated long-term track record.

The Family Plumber demonstrates exceptional performance across all dimensions, earning a WW Score of 88.2. Professionalism is a standout strength with 287 mentions emphasizing punctuality, courtesy, communication, and cleanliness. Project completion is consistently reliable with 256 mentions of on-time work, thorough follow-through, and problem-solving. Experience is well-documented with 198 mentions of skilled technicians, quality workmanship, and knowledgeable service. Pricing receives a solid 79.0 score based on 98 mentions, with most customers finding value fair, though some note costs are higher than competitors. The company's longevity (many 20+ year customers) and family-owned reputation reinforce trust and reliability.

• Two duplicate reviews detected (CARLOS DID A GOOD JOB putting the valve and P trap - dated 2025-06-07 and 2025-06-05), suggesting possible review manipulation or data entry error.
• Multiple empty review texts (no content, only ratings) present in dataset - 11 instances of 5-star ratings with blank text. These cannot be scored on any dimension and reduce data quality.
• One negative review (1-star, 2023-04-19) explicitly states 'charges WAY TOO MUCH' and recommends going elsewhere, contrasting sharply with overwhelmingly positive reviews. This outlier is legitimate but represents minority experience.
• Three reviews (1-star ratings from 2015, 2021, 2013) cite specific service failures or refusals (condo insurance issue, vaccination policy, no-show), indicating occasional operational gaps despite overall excellence.
• Pricing dimension shows legitimate variance: some customers report 'extremely fair' pricing while others cite costs 50% higher than competitors. This suggests pricing may vary by job complexity or market conditions.
• Review recency: Majority of reviews (approximately 70%) are from 2020-2025, with strong recent performance. Older reviews (2006-2015) also consistently positive, indicating sustained quality over 15+ years.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 515 usable reviews with robust data across all four dimensions and exceptionally high mention counts (98-287 per dimension). The consistency of positive feedback over 15+ years, combined with detailed, specific praise from long-term customers, strongly supports the score. Minor concerns include a small number of legitimate service failures and pricing variability, but these do not materially undermine the overall assessment. The company's family-owned structure and owner involvement in problem resolution further validate reliability.

Mike Schneider demonstrates exceptional professionalism across nearly all reviews, with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, cleanliness (booties/shoe covers), and courteous demeanor. Pricing is strongly validated as fair and competitive, with multiple customers noting savings versus other plumbers' quotes. Project completion is solid with strong follow-through, though two reviews (2019-05-29 and 2016-11-13) document instances where Mike could not resolve complex drain/sewer issues and referred customers elsewhere—these are balanced by his honesty and refund offer in one case. Technical expertise is widely affirmed, with customers appreciating his diagnostic accuracy, permanent fixes over quick fixes, and willingness to educate customers. The overwhelming majority of reviews span 2006–2024, with strong recent activity (2024, 2023, 2022), ensuring recency and relevance.

• Two negative/mixed reviews (3.0 and 2.0 ratings) document instances where Mike could not resolve complex sewer/drain clogs and referred customers to competitors. These are legitimate service limitations, not fake reviews, and Mike's honesty and refund offer in one case actually reinforce his integrity.
• One review (2016-01-25, 3.0 rating) is not about service performed but rather a complaint about Mike's policy of needing to see jobs before quoting. This is a business practice disagreement, not a service quality issue.
• One review (2014-05-07) mentions an original F rating that was later changed to 5.0 after the owner made things right. This demonstrates accountability and customer recovery, not a fake review pattern.
• The overwhelming concentration of 5.0 ratings (98 out of 101 reviews) is notable but not indicative of fake reviews. The reviews contain highly specific, varied details (different job types, dates spanning 18+ years, personal anecdotes, problem-solving narratives), genuine criticisms in the few lower-rated reviews, and consistent corroboration of claims across independent reviewers. This pattern is consistent with a genuinely excellent, long-established local contractor with strong reputation and repeat customer base.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable. It is based on 101 reviews with substantial mention counts across all four dimensions (52–87 mentions per dimension), all scoring at HIGH confidence. The reviews span 18 years (2006–2024) with strong recent activity, contain specific, varied, and corroborated details, and include honest acknowledgment of service limitations in a few cases. The few lower-rated reviews are legitimate and actually reinforce Mike's integrity through transparent problem-solving and customer recovery.

Total Care Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions, with particularly strong marks for professionalism and project completion. The company consistently receives praise for punctuality, courteous communication, honest pricing without upsells, and efficient problem-solving. Multiple reviews spanning from 2017 to 2025 confirm reliable follow-through on commitments and high-quality workmanship. The primary team members (Brad, Joaquin, Christian, and others) are frequently mentioned by name with specific positive attributes. While three negative reviews exist (pricing concerns, rudeness, and one refusal of service), they represent only 3.4% of the dataset and do not materially impact the overall score given the overwhelming positive consensus.

• Two negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2024-06-24 and 2019-06-06) cite pricing concerns and alleged overcharging, suggesting potential inconsistency in quote accuracy or pricing transparency despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback on fair pricing elsewhere.
• One 1-star review from 2022-03-07 reports the company refused service due to distance (Hatton area), contradicting multiple other reviews praising their willingness to travel; this may indicate service area policy changes or inconsistent decision-making.
• Multiple reviews mention the same individuals (Brad, Joaquin, Christian) across different time periods and service types, suggesting these are core team members; however, some reviews reference different names (Mark, Carmen, Vincent Di Marco, Jose), indicating either a larger team or possible name variations/aliases that could not be fully reconciled.
• Two reviews contain no text content (empty review fields with 5.0 ratings on 2025-03-11 and 2024-12-11), which are included in the count but provide no substantive data.
• Review dates span from 2017 to 2025, with the majority (approximately 70%) from 2023 onwards, indicating strong recent performance; however, older reviews (2017-2019) show consistent quality, suggesting long-term reliability.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 87 substantive reviews with consistent positive feedback across all dimensions and high mention counts (48-72 per dimension). The score reflects genuine customer satisfaction with professional service, fair pricing, and quality workmanship, though the three negative reviews warrant acknowledgment of occasional pricing disputes and service area limitations.