Affordable Irrigation Tech

Affordable Irrigation Tech has a large and predominantly positive review base spanning 2017–2024, with Saul consistently praised for responsiveness, technical knowledge, fair pricing, and quality workmanship across dozens of reviews. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — 7 out of 75 — reveals a recurring and serious pattern: ghosting clients after initial contact or mid-project... Read more

Affordable Irrigation Tech has a large and predominantly positive review base spanning 2017–2024, with Saul consistently praised for responsiveness, technical knowledge, fair pricing, and quality workmanship across dozens of reviews. However, a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — 7 out of 75 — reveals a recurring and serious pattern: ghosting clients after initial contact or mid-project, failing to follow through on promised written estimates or invoices, and going silent after completing work without communicating completion. These are not isolated incidents but a documented behavioral pattern across multiple years (2018, 2020, 2021, 2024), which materially drags down the professionalism and project completion scores. Pricing and experience scores remain relatively strong, as negative reviewers rarely disputed the quality of work actually performed or the fairness of pricing — their complaints centered almost entirely on communication failures and reliability. The WW Score of 76.4 reflects a contractor with genuine skill and mostly satisfied customers, tempered by a non-trivial rate of serious reliability failures that prospective customers should weigh carefully. Read less