Find Nearby Plumbers In Glendale, California

This contractor has an overwhelmingly positive review record across a large volume of reviews spanning multiple years, with consistent praise for professionalism, responsiveness, punctuality, and communication. Pricing is frequently cited as a strength, with many reviewers explicitly noting that quotes were fair, affordable, or significantly lower than competitors — though one detailed 1-star review alleges serious price gouging and use of a used part billed as new, which meaningfully tempers the pricing score. Project completion is strong, with the vast majority of reviewers reporting jobs finished promptly, thoroughly, and cleanly, including emergency and after-hours calls — however, one reviewer noted that a written estimate was never followed up on after a consultation, indicating an isolated but real follow-through failure. Experience and technical skill are highly praised across dozens of reviews, with multiple customers noting that the technicians diagnosed problems other plumbers missed and resolved complex or unusual jobs effectively. The one significant negative review also raises a concern about a prior business operating under a suspended entity (Flow Tech Plumbing), which warrants caution.

• One detailed 1-star review (2023-03-27) alleges price gouging, installation of a used part billed as new, non-responsiveness after complaint, and links the business to a previously suspended entity (Flow Tech Plumbing / FTB suspended). This is a serious allegation that reduces confidence in the pricing dimension.
• One 1-star review (2023-10-30) reports that the company came for a consultation but never followed up with a written estimate despite multiple attempts — a project completion and communication concern.
• Reviews reference multiple business names and technician names (ADH Plumbing, New Image Plumbing, Pierre, Andy, Sam, Mathew, Jony), suggesting this may be a merged or rebranded entity or a combined review pool across related businesses. Scores should be interpreted with this ambiguity in mind.
• A small number of reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'This company is the top best service for any emergency calls and will always leave the customer satisfied.' — 2022-10-25), which may indicate low-detail or potentially inauthentic entries. However, the majority of reviews contain specific details, names, and job descriptions, reducing overall fake review concern.
• Several reviews are older than 3 years (2019–2021 range), and a small number date back to 2013. While recency-weighted scoring was applied, the older reviews carry less weight in the final assessment.
• The review dated 2023-09-22 mentions a cost of approximately $680/hour, which is notably high and inconsistent with the majority of pricing feedback. This outlier was factored into the pricing score conservatively.

This WW Score is based on a large and detailed review dataset (88 reviews) and carries HIGH overall confidence, but users should be aware of one credible and detailed fraud allegation, a business name/entity ambiguity, and the presence of a small number of generic reviews that slightly reduce full trust in the pricing dimension specifically.

Plumber Duck receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courteous communication, and responsiveness, including same-day and emergency availability. Pricing is noted favorably in numerous reviews, with multiple customers explicitly stating they were not overcharged and that the company was honest about avoiding unnecessary upsells. Project completion scores well, with reviewers describing jobs finished thoroughly, callbacks honored, and technicians staying until issues were fully resolved. Experience and technical skill are affirmed across a wide range of job types including slab leaks, water heater repairs, main line replacements, and gas pipe fixes. One negative review from December 2022 describes a no-call/no-show pattern over four weeks and unprofessional office communication, which meaningfully tempers scores and prevents a higher ceiling.

• 18 of 75 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• Several short reviews ('Best ever!!!', 'My fav', 'professional, fast and efficient') are generic and lack specifics, which slightly reduces confidence in the overall positive signal.
• All reviews are 5-star except one 1-star review. While the volume and variety of detail in many reviews suggests authenticity, the near-perfect rating distribution warrants mild caution.
• One substantive negative review (Dec 2022) describes a 4-week no-call/no-show, unprofessional office staff behavior, and a breakdown in owner accountability. This is a credible complaint and has been factored into professionalism and project completion scores.
• A number of reviews are older than 12 months (2020–2022 range). While these are consistent in tone with recent reviews, recency weighting was applied to favor the 2024–2025 reviews which remain strongly positive.
• No reviews mention pricing concerns or hidden charges negatively, but the single negative review did not address pricing, so the pricing score reflects only positive mentions.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews with usable narrative content spanning multiple years, and is considered moderately reliable — the HIGH confidence across all dimensions reflects mention volume, though the large proportion of text-free reviews and one credible negative experience introduce enough uncertainty to treat the score as a strong but not unconditional endorsement.

1 Day Rooter and Plumbing scores very strongly across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and consistent body of reviews praising punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous communication. Pricing is frequently described as fair, transparent, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting the company did not attempt to upsell or overcharge — though one negative review raised a concern about a $180 charge for a written estimate and a failure to follow up, which moderately tempers the pricing and professionalism scores. Project completion is a clear strength, with dozens of reviewers confirming jobs were finished the same day or next day, workspaces were left clean, and callbacks were honored at no extra charge. The one 1-star review describing a complete communication breakdown after an estimate visit is a meaningful outlier that prevents a higher score in professionalism and project completion, as it describes a real failure in follow-through that cannot be dismissed.

• One significant negative review (1-star, dated 2024-03-06) describes a failure to follow up after an estimate visit, a charge proposed for a written estimate, and complete non-responsiveness despite multiple contact attempts. This is a credible, detailed complaint and has been weighted accordingly.
• A small number of reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Very reliable, efficient, reputable and knowledgeable. I highly recommend this company.' and 'Very knowledgeable and professional. I am highly recommending 1 Day Rooter & Plumbing') with no specific details. These were counted for dimension mentions only where the language was explicit enough to justify it.
• One review (dated 2023-02-15) refers to the company as 'Josh Plumbing' rather than '1 Day Rooter and Plumbing' and reads somewhat templated in structure, which raises a minor authenticity flag. It was included but treated with reduced weight.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star. While the volume and specificity of most reviews suggest authenticity, the near-uniform rating warrants mild caution. The presence of one detailed 1-star review and several nuanced 5-star reviews (e.g., noting higher-than-expected costs) adds credibility to the corpus overall.
• All reviews fall within approximately the past 24 months (earliest: 2023-02-09, latest: 2024-11-08), with a strong concentration in 2023-2024. Recency is good and no significant downward trend in quality is detectable across the timeline.

This WW Score is based on 62 reviews with strong recency, high mention counts across all four dimensions, and sufficient detail in the majority of reviews to support confident scoring — it should be considered a reliable representation of this contractor's typical service quality, with the caveat that the one detailed negative review signals a real, if infrequent, risk of communication failure.

Republic Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, clear communication, and courteous attitude — including same-day and emergency availability. Pricing scores well, with many reviewers noting competitive quotes, no hidden charges, and multiple instances where the final bill came in below the original estimate; however, one 1-star review describes a $900–$1,100 charge for a job that produced no result (a hole dug and refilled), which meaningfully tempers the pricing score. Project completion is consistently strong, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished completely, on time, and with follow-through including callbacks and repeat visits — the single negative review is the only documented case of an incomplete or unsatisfactory outcome. Experience scores well based on explicit mentions of technical skill, problem-solving on complex jobs (root intrusion, pipe rerouting, hydro-jetting, repiping), and knowledgeable diagnosis, though a handful of reviews are too brief to contribute meaningfully to this dimension.

• REVIEW SPREAD WARNING: Reviews span from 2015 to 2024. Reviews dated 2015–2018 (6 reviews) reference different technicians (Andy, Jeff, Bleu, LeAnn) and may reflect a different team or business era. These older reviews were included but given reduced implicit weight given the 9-year gap.
• ONE NEGATIVE REVIEW DETECTED (1-star, 2020-11-24): Customer was charged approximately $900–$1,100 for excavation work that yielded no repair, cited lack of proper equipment, poor communication, and overpricing. This is a substantive complaint and was factored into both the pricing and project completion scores.
• MILD REPETITION PATTERN: A large number of reviews use similar phrasing ('same day,' 'highly recommend,' 'responsive,' 'fair price'). While this is consistent with genuine customer experience patterns for a responsive plumber, the volume of near-identical short reviews (e.g., 'Fast response. Good service. Reasonable price.') warrants mild caution. No score reduction applied but noted.
• ALL RATINGS ARE 5-STAR EXCEPT ONE: 60 of 61 reviews are 5-star. While the review content is largely specific and credible, this near-perfect rating distribution should be noted as a potential platform selection or recency bias factor.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of substantive, detailed reviews are from 2022–2024, which is a positive signal. The most recent reviews continue to reflect high quality, suggesting consistency over time.

This WW Score is based on 61 reviews with a high proportion of detailed, specific, and recent feedback, making it one of the more reliable assessments possible — however, the near-universal 5-star rating distribution and one substantive negative review (pricing/completion failure) introduce a small degree of caution, and the score should be treated as strong but not unconditional.

Right Price Rooter & Plumbing and Remedy Plumber (Ruben) collectively receive strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently highlight punctuality, courteous communication, and responsiveness including holidays and emergencies. Pricing is a notable differentiator, with multiple reviewers explicitly stating this company came in lowest among several competing estimates while still delivering quality work. Project completion scores well overall, with most reviewers confirming jobs were finished thoroughly and followed up on, though one negative review about Ruben (2-star, 2021) describes incomplete work, multiple leaks left unfixed before inspection, and a refusal to honor warranty — this meaningfully pulls the project completion and experience scores down from what would otherwise be near-perfect. Experience scores are supported by technically detailed reviews praising diagnostic accuracy, problem-solving under difficult conditions, and knowledge of code compliance, though the single negative review introduces a credible counter-signal that prevents a higher score.

• MIXED CONTRACTOR POOL: Reviews appear to cover at least two distinct business entities — 'Right Price Rooter & Plumbing' (Mick and crew) and 'Remedy Plumber' (Ruben/Reuben). These may be separate businesses reviewed on the same profile, which could distort the aggregate score. Scores should be interpreted with this in mind.
• ONE SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE REVIEW: The 2-star review from October 2021 about Ruben describes serious workmanship failures including multiple unresolved leaks before inspection, incorrect hot/cold line connection, billing irregularities, and refusal to provide warranty. This is a credible, detailed negative review and has been factored into scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: A meaningful portion of reviews (roughly 15+) are dated 2016–2020, making them 4–8 years old. More recent reviews (2023–2024) are present and weighted more heavily, but the older reviews still form a significant portion of the dataset.
• POSSIBLE PROFILE AGGREGATION: Several reviews reference 'Remedy Plumber' as a distinct brand name, while others clearly reference 'Right Price Rooter.' If these are separate companies sharing a review profile, the combined score may not accurately represent either business individually.
• GENERIC REVIEWS PRESENT: A small number of reviews ('Great service!', 'They treat you like family, while providing quality, efficient service. Best choice!', 'Very professional, did work well, appreciated their responsiveness.') are very brief and lack specific detail, which slightly reduces confidence in those individual data points. However, they are not numerous enough to trigger a fake review flag on their own.
• ALL RATINGS ARE 5-STAR EXCEPT ONE: With 43 out of 44 reviews being 5-star, the rating distribution is highly skewed. While the reviews contain enough specific detail to suggest authenticity in most cases, this pattern warrants mild caution.

This WW Score is based on a reasonably large and mostly detailed review set, but reliability is moderately reduced by the apparent mixing of two distinct contractor identities within the same review pool, the presence of one credible negative review, and a significant number of reviews older than 3 years.

Crown City Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently highlight punctuality, courteous communication, responsiveness, and clean workmanship. Pricing is a notable differentiator, with multiple reviewers explicitly stating costs came in below competing quotes or below their own expectations, and one reviewer noting a final charge lower than the estimate. Project completion scores are strong but are modestly penalized by three negative reviews: one describing an abandoned leak-finding job with a charge for incomplete work, one describing a toilet installation that blocked a door and was never properly followed up on, and one describing workers who claimed to have replaced parts but apparently had not. Experience scores are high, supported by numerous accounts of successful diagnosis where other plumbers had failed, complex re-piping jobs, and emergency resolutions — though the same negative reviews introduce some doubt about consistency across the crew.

• Three reviews (1-star, 2-star x2) describe meaningful service failures: an abandoned emergency job with a charge, a poor toilet installation with no callback follow-through, and a disputed repair where workers allegedly misrepresented completed work. These are not outliers to dismiss.
• The owner's response to one negative reviewer reportedly included a voicemail referencing religious judgment ('God is watching'), which the reviewer described as childish — this is a minor professionalism flag.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 18 of 34) are older than 12 months from the most recent review date (2024-08-25), with many dating to 2017–2021. Recency weighting slightly reduces confidence in current consistency.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Reviews contain specific job details, named crew members, and varied writing styles. The presence of negative reviews further supports authenticity.
• One review references a prior plumber's failure and HOA recommendation, which may introduce slight referral bias but does not indicate fabrication.

This WW Score is based on 34 reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and is considered moderately reliable, though users should note that three substantive negative reviews reveal real inconsistencies in follow-through and crew-level quality control that the aggregate score partially obscures.