Find Nearby Plumbers In Davis, California

Goodell Well and Pump Service demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions with consistently high ratings. Professionalism is a standout strength, with 16 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous behavior—technicians frequently arrive within an hour and explain work clearly to customers. Project completion is reliable, with 14 reviews confirming jobs finished promptly and thoroughly, often same-day or next-day service. Experience is well-documented across 9 reviews highlighting technical knowledge, problem-solving ability, and willingness to educate customers. Pricing is fair according to 6 reviews, though this dimension has fewer explicit mentions. One negative 1-star review from 2014 citing rudeness and refusal to work significantly impacts the score but is substantially outweighed by 18 five-star reviews spanning 11 years.

• One stark outlier: 1-star review (2014-05-20) describing rude behavior and refusal to work, contrasting sharply with all other reviews. This suggests either a genuine service failure or a misunderstanding, but it is treated as valid data and appropriately weighted.
• 18 of 19 reviews are 5-star ratings. While the consistency is notable, the reviews contain specific details (names, timeframes, technical issues, pricing comparisons) that suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews. No suspicious repetitive phrasing detected.
• Review recency: 10 reviews from 2024-2022 (past 2 years), 9 reviews from 2021-2013 (older). Recent reviews maintain the same high quality standard, suggesting consistent performance over time.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 19 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions and consistent positive feedback spanning 11 years. The single negative review is appropriately weighted but does not undermine the overall pattern of excellence in professionalism, completion, and experience.

Hewitt & Sons Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions with a WW Score of 87.2. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 10 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, politeness, responsiveness, and communication. Project completion is consistently reliable, with 8 reviews confirming jobs were finished thoroughly and on time, including complex diagnostic work. Technical experience is well-documented across 7 reviews, highlighting skilled problem-solving and knowledge. Pricing presents the only concern: while 3 reviews mention fair or good value, one review flagged a $120 charge for a 15-minute diagnostic as potentially high, creating moderate confidence in the pricing dimension. Most reviews are older than 12 months, which slightly limits recency validation.

• Two reviews contain minimal or no substantive content ('unknown' and '.'), suggesting data quality issues but not necessarily fake reviews.
• Most reviews are from 2011–2018; only 3 reviews are from 2020 or later, limiting ability to assess current service standards.
• One pricing complaint (Review 3, 2021) stands out against otherwise positive feedback; $120 for 15-minute diagnostic may reflect legitimate service call minimums, but warrants note.
• No negative reviews on professionalism, completion, or experience; while this is positive, the absence of any critical feedback across 14 reviews is atypical and should be interpreted cautiously.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across three of four dimensions and consistent positive feedback on core service delivery; however, the age of most reviews and limited recent data suggest caution when projecting current performance, and the pricing dimension should be validated with current quotes.

CW Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism and experience being the most frequently praised attributes — technicians like Eric, David, Cleanord, and Theron are repeatedly cited by name for their courtesy, punctuality, and technical skill. Project completion scores are strong, with numerous reviews confirming jobs were finished promptly, often same-day or within hours of the call, including emergency situations. Pricing scores are tempered by one explicit complaint of $598 charged for roughly one hour of labor and minimal parts, and one older review suggesting the company was chosen for being cheap but delivered poor value — these two data points prevent a higher pricing score despite several reviews calling the company 'reasonably priced.' Professionalism is slightly penalized due to two negative reviews: one describing a plumber who refused to remove muddy shoes, arrived late, and was caught in a dishonesty, and one older review describing a technician who walked into a home without knocking and left messes behind.

• Three reviews contain no text at all — only a 5-star rating (dates: 2024-08-13, 2024-06-09 x2). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review dated 2024-09-05 reads like a business advertisement ('Great prices 916 470-0451 / Free estimates / Licensed / All your plumbing needs') and appears to be a self-promotional or fake entry. It was excluded from scoring.
• Two reviews posted on 2024-11-11 are nearly identical in phrasing: 'The gentleman was polite professional and a hard worker! Couldn't ask for better service Will continue to recommend!' — one mentions a clogged main line, the other does not. This may indicate a duplicate or coordinated review. Treated with caution.
• A large cluster of reviews share the same date of 2024-06-09 (approximately 10 reviews). While not identical in content, the concentration on a single date is unusual and may suggest a solicited review campaign. Confidence is not reduced significantly given the specificity of most of those reviews, but this pattern is flagged.
• The review base spans from 2012 to 2025. Reviews older than 2022 (approximately 7 reviews) were given reduced weight in scoring, as they may not reflect current business practices. The two most critical negative reviews are from 2023 and 2014 respectively.
• The 2014 negative review is over 10 years old and references staff members (Sandy, Johnny) who may no longer be with the company. It was included in professionalism scoring at reduced weight due to age.
• Overall, the review set skews heavily positive (5-star), which warrants some caution, but the majority of positive reviews contain specific names, job details, and situational context that lend credibility.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews (55 total, 52 with usable data) spanning 2012–2025, with the majority from 2024–2025, giving the score reasonably HIGH reliability — though the heavy skew toward 5-star ratings, a cluster of same-date reviews, and a few suspected non-genuine entries introduce moderate caution, particularly for the pricing dimension which rests on limited explicit data points.

Rebuildit (Muntean's Services) earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews spanning 2019–2024. Professionalism scores well overall but is meaningfully dragged down by four reviews citing unresponsiveness or failure to follow through on quotes and scheduling — a recurring pattern that cannot be ignored. Pricing is generally praised as competitive and fair, with transparent itemized quotes noted by multiple reviewers, though one review explicitly called the company 'way too overpriced' for a door installation, introducing some variance. Project completion is a clear strength, with dozens of reviewers confirming jobs were finished on time, callbacks were honored, and teams went above and beyond scope — the water damage and flooring projects in particular reflect strong follow-through. Experience and workmanship are consistently praised across a wide variety of trade types including flooring, plumbing, drywall, painting, electrical, and cabinetry, with multiple reviewers noting attention to detail and quality outcomes.

• RESPONSIVENESS PATTERN — 4 separate reviews (2020-09-05, 2021-06-03, 2023-10-04, and implicitly the 2020-09-05 Sheri review) explicitly cite failure to respond, follow up on quotes, or communicate availability. This is a consistent and credible negative pattern that suppresses the professionalism score.
• RECENCY NOTE — The majority of reviews (approximately 40 of 60) are dated before January 2023, meaning they are more than 12 months old relative to a mid-2024 analysis date. Only about 8 reviews are from 2023–2024. Recent performance data is limited.
• MILD GENERIC REVIEW CONCERN — Several short reviews (e.g., 'Great service!', 'Very good service! Thank you guys!!!', 'Best service i ever had') lack specific detail and could inflate sentiment. However, the majority of reviews are sufficiently detailed and specific to suggest the review base is largely authentic.
• PRICING CONFLICT — One 1-star review (2024-07-09) explicitly states the company is 'way too overpriced' for a door installation, directly contradicting the majority of reviewers who praise competitive pricing. This single outlier was weighted but does not override the broader consensus.
• PAINT QUALITY CONCERN — One 4-star review (2022-01-11) noted specific paint quality issues including missed areas behind medicine cabinets, painting over hardware, and visible old paint showing through. This is a minor but specific quality flag for painting work.

This WW Score is based on a high volume of detailed, multi-year reviews and carries HIGH overall confidence, though users should note a recurring responsiveness issue flagged across multiple independent reviews and the fact that the majority of reviews predate 2023.

Streamline Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particular strength in project completion (85.1) and professionalism (84.2). The company excels at punctuality, responsiveness, and finishing jobs as promised, with extensive evidence of same-day or next-day service availability. Pricing is competitive and generally perceived as fair, though some customers note they are not the absolute cheapest option. Technical expertise and workmanship quality are consistently praised, particularly for complex sewer lateral replacements. The primary weakness is occasional communication gaps during projects and some inconsistency in follow-up documentation.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple identical or near-identical reviews appear in the dataset, particularly reviews dated 2025-06-07, 2025-05-10, 2025-02-09, 2025-01-10, 2024-11-11, 2024-10-12, 2024-06-09, and 2023-06-10. These duplicates suggest potential review manipulation or data entry errors. Confidence in scores should be adjusted downward by approximately 5-10% due to this pattern.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 60% of reviews are from 2024-2025, with a significant cluster from June 2024 onward. Older reviews (2010-2018) show similar patterns but with slightly lower consistency. Recent reviews may not reflect current operational standards if staffing or management has changed.
• MIXED OWNERSHIP/STAFF EXPERIENCE: Reviews reference multiple owners/managers (Greg Martin, Eric, Shawn, Brian, Sean, Ben, Noel) across different locations and time periods, suggesting either multiple locations, staff turnover, or name variations. This complicates assessment of consistency.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW CONCENTRATION: Negative reviews (1-2 stars) cluster around specific issues: communication failures, no-shows, overcharging, and incomplete work. These are not randomly distributed and suggest systemic issues that emerge under specific conditions (high volume periods, complex jobs, scheduling conflicts).
• GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION: Reviews span multiple states (CA, CO, WA, OR) with different regulatory environments. Performance consistency across regions is unclear.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable with HIGH confidence for general plumbing work and sewer lateral replacements in California, but should be treated with caution due to detected duplicate reviews and potential data quality issues. The score accurately reflects strong technical execution and responsiveness, but understates communication and follow-up inconsistencies. Prospective customers should expect excellent workmanship and punctuality but should confirm all details in writing and verify completion before final payment.

J&M Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven by consistently high marks across all four dimensions. Professionalism (85.0) is well-supported by 24 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and communication. Pricing (84.0) receives strong validation across 13 mentions emphasizing fair rates and value. Experience (87.0) is reinforced by 16 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving ability. However, Project Completion (78.0) is the weakest dimension, with 18 mentions revealing two significant failures: one customer was left with a flooded basement after incomplete diagnostic work, and another experienced a no-show appointment with no callback. These serious incidents substantially lower confidence in follow-through reliability despite numerous positive completion reports.

• CRITICAL: Two severe project completion failures documented. Review from 2021-09-16 describes flooded basement left unresolved and incomplete diagnostic work; review from 2023-04-03 reports no-show appointment with no communication. These are not minor issues and directly contradict the majority positive narrative.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Majority of reviews (24 of 37) are older than 2 years, with only 4 reviews from 2024. Most recent negative reviews (2023-08-28 and 2023-04-03) suggest ongoing professionalism issues. Recent 2024 reviews are uniformly positive, but sample size is small.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple empty review text fields (3 reviews with 5.0 ratings but no text) and several reviews with generic praise lacking specifics. However, most reviews contain sufficient detail to be credible.
• STAFF CONSISTENCY ISSUE: Reviews reference multiple staff members (Jamie, Jaime, John, Jason, Jeremy, Jose, Mike, Jamey) suggesting either high turnover or multiple locations/franchises. Quality and professionalism appear inconsistent across different staff members.
• UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT: 2024-08-28 review documents owner sending hostile text message to customer ('You're a very inconsiderate old lady...'), which is a serious red flag for company culture and owner judgment.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-to-HIGH caution. While the majority of reviews are positive and detailed, the presence of two documented project completion failures (flooded basement, no-show with no callback), an owner's documented hostile communication, and heavy weighting toward older reviews (65% over 2 years old) suggest the score may overstate current reliability. The company demonstrates strong technical skill and pricing fairness, but follow-through and professionalism consistency are genuine concerns that warrant direct verification before engaging for major projects.