Find Nearby Plumbers In Anaheim, California

Derik/Carreon Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and professional demeanor across 5 reviews. Project completion is solid with multiple complex jobs finished successfully including kitchen sink installations, water filtration systems, and emergency repairs completed on time. Technical expertise is evident from reviews highlighting knowledge of specialized systems (recirculating pumps, water filtration, code compliance). Pricing feedback is limited but positive where mentioned. All reviews are recent (within past 2 years) and highly detailed with specific project examples.

• All 6 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is atypical and warrants caution, though reviews contain sufficient specific detail (project names, technical specifics, inspector credentials) to suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews
• Pricing dimension based on only 2 mentions; confidence is limited for this metric
• One review (2023-01-20) appears twice with nearly identical timestamp, suggesting possible duplicate entry rather than separate review
• Review from 2023-01-20 mentions reviewer is ICC/AWS/IAPMO inspector, lending credibility but also suggesting possible professional relationship bias

This WW Score of 89.2 is reliable for professionalism and project completion (HIGH confidence), moderately reliable for experience (MODERATE confidence), and less reliable for pricing (LIMITED confidence). The absence of any negative reviews is unusual and should be considered when interpreting overall trustworthiness; however, the specificity and technical detail in reviews suggest genuine customer feedback rather than fabricated praise.

Prolific Plumbing (operating primarily under Kody Rivas) earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning 2021 through mid-2025. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, shoe covers, clean uniforms, clear communication, and courteous demeanor. Pricing scores well but is tempered by one notable 2-star review describing a subcontracted visit (under a different company name) where quotes of $500–$700 for a drain unclog were deemed exorbitant — a meaningful outlier that prevents a higher pricing score. Project completion is consistently strong, with reviewers describing jobs finished same-day, callbacks honored, and extra issues fixed at no charge. Experience is highly rated, with multiple reviewers contrasting Kody's diagnostic accuracy and technical knowledge favorably against other plumbers who had failed or overquoted the same jobs.

• MIXED ENTITY CONCERN: The first 19 reviews (dated 2025-03-11 through 2025-06-04) reference 'Anaheim Plumbing' and one references 'Surprise Plumbing,' while the remaining reviews reference 'Prolific Plumbing.' These appear to be reviews for different businesses or a rebranded/merged entity. The early 2025 reviews are notably generic, short, and lack the specific detail (technician names, job specifics, personal anecdotes) present in the Prolific Plumbing reviews. This raises a moderate fake review concern for the Anaheim Plumbing cluster.
• POSSIBLE FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: The 19 'Anaheim Plumbing' reviews from 2025 are uniformly 5-star, very short, lack named technicians, and use formulaic phrasing (e.g., 'smooth fix,' 'no mess, no hassle,' 'game-changer'). Several share identical posting dates (2025-05-26, 2025-05-10). This pattern is consistent with review padding and should be treated with skepticism.
• SUBCONTRACTOR INCIDENT: One 2-star review (2025-02-09) explicitly states the caller was redirected to a subcontracted service called 'Always Plumbing,' not Prolific Plumbing directly. The technician smelled of cigarettes and quoted $500–$700 for a drain unclog. This reflects poorly on vetting of subcontractors and pricing transparency under certain dispatch conditions.
• RECENCY NOTE: The bulk of detailed, verifiable Prolific Plumbing reviews are from 2021–2024. The 2025 reviews are dominated by the suspect Anaheim Plumbing cluster. Scores are primarily anchored to the 2021–2024 Prolific Plumbing reviews which are high-quality and credible.
• SCORE IMPACT: The Anaheim Plumbing reviews were included in mention counts but weighted conservatively due to fake review concerns. Removing them would not materially change dimension scores given the large volume of credible Prolific Plumbing reviews.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall reliability for Prolific Plumbing's core operations, supported by 80+ detailed, specific, and independently worded reviews; however, consumers should be aware of the suspect Anaheim Plumbing review cluster in early 2025 and the single subcontractor pricing complaint, which together introduce a moderate caveat around current pricing transparency and operational consistency.

Eduardo earns consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight his punctuality, communication, friendly attitude, and cleanliness. Pricing is a standout strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting fair, reasonable, or below-market rates, no upselling, and transparent options presented before work begins. Project completion is also very well supported, with numerous accounts of same-day or next-day service, follow-through on callbacks, and jobs finished cleanly and completely — including one notable instance of a free return visit to resolve a defective part. Experience is strongly evidenced through reviews describing complex diagnoses, multi-trade competence, and technical problem-solving that surpassed prior plumbers. The primary caveat is that the review set spans roughly a decade (2014–2024), with the majority of reviews predating 2021, meaning recent performance data is comparatively thin.

• All 83 reviews are 5-star with zero negative or mixed reviews, which is statistically unusual and warrants mild scrutiny.
• However, the reviews contain substantial specific detail — job types, named issues, follow-up visits, pricing comparisons, and personal anecdotes — which strongly argues against a fake review pattern. The uniformity of positive sentiment appears to reflect genuine customer satisfaction rather than fabrication.
• Recency concern: The majority of reviews (approximately 65 of 83) are dated before January 2021, with only a small cluster from 2021–2024. The WW Score is heavily influenced by older reviews. Recent performance (past 12 months) is supported by only 2 reviews (July 2024), which limits confidence in current service quality.
• One review (2018-10-18) describes Eduardo being too busy to come out but coaching the customer by phone — this is positive for honesty but represents a non-completion of service, noted for transparency.
• The name is spelled inconsistently across reviews (Eduardo, Edwardo, Edward, Eddie, Ed) — this is consistent with a single operator known informally by multiple name variants and does not suggest fake reviews.

This WW Score carries HIGH confidence in its directional accuracy given the large volume of detailed, specific reviews, but should be interpreted with moderate caution regarding current performance due to the limited number of reviews from the past 12 months.

Phil and Revival Plumbing receive overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most consistently praised attribute — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, same-day responsiveness, clear communication, and courteous demeanor. Project completion scores are strong, with multiple reviewers noting that Phil succeeded where other plumbers had failed, and that jobs were finished cleanly and thoroughly in a single visit. Experience scores are bolstered by references to 30+ years in the trade, well-stocked trucks, and the ability to diagnose and resolve complex issues quickly. Pricing is generally rated positively, with several reviewers calling it fair or reasonable and one reviewer crediting Phil with saving them thousands in unnecessary work — however, one 1-star review explicitly called out a $500 quote for minor repairs as excessive, which tempers the pricing score and prevents it from reaching the same level as the other dimensions.

• One 1-star review (2023-11-15) explicitly cited a $500 quote for what the reviewer described as minor toilet and shutoff valve repairs, representing a meaningful pricing concern that is factored into the pricing score.
• Several reviews use similar superlatives ('honest', 'professional', 'knowledgeable', 'fair pricing') but most include specific job details, locations, or personal anecdotes that reduce the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 12 of 24) are dated prior to 2023, meaning they are more than 12 months old relative to the most recent review date. The most recent reviews (2024) remain consistent in tone and quality, but recency weighting slightly reduces confidence in the aggregate picture.
• No reviews mention any negative outcome related to project completion or workmanship quality, which is a strong positive signal but also worth noting as an absence of critical feedback across a 5-year review window.

This WW Score is based on 24 reviews spanning approximately five years, with strong mention counts across all four dimensions and no detected patterns of fake reviews, making the score moderately reliable — though the single negative pricing review and the age of roughly half the reviews introduce minor uncertainty.

Raul receives consistently strong praise across all four dimensions from all 10 reviewers. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with nearly every reviewer noting punctuality, responsiveness, clear communication, and a friendly, respectful demeanor — including showing up on a holiday and late on a Friday. Pricing is explicitly called out as reasonable, fair, and transparent by the majority of reviewers, with one reviewer highlighting significant savings over a competitor's diagnosis. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs that were finished correctly the first time, cleaned up after, and resolved without callbacks. Experience scores are bolstered by specific mentions of accurate diagnosis (e.g., correctly identifying calcium buildup vs. a pipe issue), proper equipment use, and quality workmanship across a variety of job types.

• All 10 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback of any kind — this warrants mild caution, though most reviews contain specific job details and unique phrasing that reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• Two reviews use slightly different spellings of the contractor's name ('Raul' vs. 'Rahul') — this may reflect a real name variation or transcription inconsistency, but does not appear to indicate fake reviews.
• Two reviews (2022-08-01 and 2022-08-04) are over two years old and carry reduced recency weight; the majority of reviews (8 out of 10) are from 2023–2024 and are considered current.
• Sample size of 10 reviews is relatively small; scores carry HIGH confidence per the mention-count rules but should be interpreted with awareness that a larger review base would provide greater statistical reliability.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — the review content is specific, varied, and largely consistent across a recent timeframe, but the small sample size of 10 reviews and the absence of any critical feedback limit the depth of confidence that can be placed in the scores.

OVC Plumbing receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting punctuality, friendly communication, cleanliness, and responsiveness from both field technicians and office staff. Pricing is explicitly praised in multiple reviews, with customers describing OVC as affordable, fair, and free of bait-and-switch tactics — a notably specific and credible endorsement. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers describing same-day and next-day service, jobs finished quickly and thoroughly, and a bathroom remodel delivered on time and on schedule. Experience is well-supported by references to skilled pipe rerouting, accurate diagnostics, root-cause identification, and a technician who proactively caught a tile flaw — all indicators of genuine technical competence.

• All 9 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews use similarly enthusiastic language and structure, though most include specific names, job types, and details that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• One reviewer (5-year customer, real estate investor) may have a closer relationship with the business owner, which could introduce bias.
• Review volume is low (9 total), so while confidence is HIGH per dimension, the overall score should be interpreted with awareness of the small sample size.

This WW Score is reasonably trustworthy given that all four dimensions have sufficient mentions and reviews contain specific, verifiable details, but the small total review count and universal 5-star ratings mean the score should be treated as a strong early signal rather than a fully validated assessment.