Find Nearby Plumbers In Phoenix, Arizona

ACE Home Services (formerly Yavapai Plumbing and Heating) presents a deeply polarized review profile. Individual technicians — including Jaime, Billy, Richard Martinez, Ron, Jacob, Gabriel, Alexis, and others — frequently receive strong praise for professionalism, punctuality, and knowledge, which props up the professionalism and experience scores. However, these positives are substantially offset by a large volume of serious complaints across all dimensions: pricing is the most consistently criticized dimension, with dozens of reviewers citing charges that were double to quadruple competitor quotes, hidden fees, parts marked up 10–20x retail, and charges for work not performed. Project completion is significantly damaged by multiple accounts of no-shows, missed appointment windows with no callbacks, abandoned or incomplete work, and at least one case of severe property damage with zero follow-up. Experience scores are pulled down by credible accounts of misdiagnosis, upselling unnecessary replacements, and shoddy workmanship including code violations and improper installations.

• SUSPECTED FAKE REVIEW CLUSTER: Between 2025-06-07 and 2025-06-09, there are approximately 20+ reviews that are extremely short (e.g., 'Gabriel did awesome!!!', 'Alexis was great', 'Gabriel did a great job.', 'Gabriel did great!'), all 5-star, many referencing the same technician names (Gabriel appears 7+ times in two days, Alexis appears 4+ times). Several reviews have no text at all with a 5-star rating. This pattern is highly consistent with coordinated fake or incentivized reviews. Confidence in the positive signals from this cluster is LOW.
• TWO BLANK REVIEWS with 5-star ratings on 2025-06-09 and additional blanks on 2025-05-09 — these carry no usable data and were excluded from scoring.
• ONE REVIEW (dated 2024-01-23) appears to be for an ACE Hardware retail store, not ACE Home Services. It was excluded from scoring as it is clearly a different business.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS ARE SEVERE AND CONSISTENT: Overcharging allegations span the entire review history from 2015 to 2025, across plumbing, HVAC, and electrical services. Multiple reviewers found competitor prices 40–70% lower. At least two reviewers allege charges for work never performed. One reviewer was quoted $1,960 to replace water heater elements that cost $50 in parts and took 1 hour.
• PROPERTY DAMAGE AND ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY: At least two reviews (June 2025 and November 2024) describe severe bathroom damage from plumbing work, with the company going completely unresponsive afterward. The general manager is named as unresponsive in one review.
• NO-SHOW AND SCHEDULING FAILURES: At least 6 distinct reviews describe confirmed appointments where no technician arrived and no proactive communication was made, spanning 2024–2025.
• EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS: Two reviews (June 2025) allege the company does not pay employees properly and steals from staff. While unverified, this is a reputational flag.
• RECENCY NOTE: The suspicious 5-star cluster is concentrated in the most recent dates (June 2025), which under recency weighting rules would normally boost the score — however, the fake review flag substantially reduces the reliability of this cluster.
• UPSELLING PATTERN: A recurring and credible pattern exists across many years of reviews where technicians recommend full system replacements when minor repairs were sufficient, confirmed by customers who obtained second opinions.

This WW Score carries HIGH data confidence due to the large review volume, but the score itself should be treated with caution given a credible fake review cluster inflating recent positive signals, severe and consistent pricing complaints spanning years, documented cases of property damage and non-response, and a clear pattern of aggressive upselling — the true performance score for pricing and project completion is likely lower than calculated.

Rapid Rooter shows a mixed but analyzable track record across all four dimensions. Professionalism scores moderately — many reviewers praised punctuality, communication, and friendly demeanor, but two notable negative reviews describe cancelled appointments without notice, poor receipt practices, and dismissive responses to warranty concerns. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while a few older reviews found costs reasonable or below expectation, two significant negative reviews describe pricing that felt exploitative — most critically the $825 charge to swap a part the customer ultimately replaced themselves for $92. Project completion is middling; most jobs were finished and warranties were honored in some cases, but there are clear instances of cancelled appointments, a rushed job due to a late subcontractor, and a disputed warranty situation that left the customer feeling misled. Experience scores reasonably well, with multiple reviewers noting knowledgeable, skilled technicians who explained their work clearly, though the rushed pipe replacement job raised quality concerns.

• One review (Rating: 5.0, Date: 2015-03-26) contains only the text 'unknown' and provides no usable data — excluded from scoring.
• Several older reviews (2006–2012) use all-caps formatting and generic praise with minimal specifics, which may indicate lower-quality or templated review submissions. These were scored conservatively.
• The majority of reviews are older than 1 year relative to the most recent review date (2024-06-19). Only 2 reviews are from 2022 or later, meaning the score may not reflect current service quality.
• The company appears to have undergone a merger or acquisition (referenced in the 2023 review mentioning Lincoln Air & Plumbing), which may mean older reviews reflect a different operational entity.
• The 1-star review from 2023 is highly detailed and specific, lending it strong credibility and significant negative weight on the pricing and project completion dimensions.

This WW Score carries MODERATE overall reliability — while all four dimensions have sufficient mentions to score, the review set spans 18 years with only 2 recent reviews, the company has changed ownership, and several older reviews lack specificity, making it difficult to assess current service quality with high confidence.

Happy Valley Plumbing shows a deeply polarized review pattern with 19 five-star reviews praising professionalism, technical skill, and customer service, but 10 one-star reviews citing serious failures in responsiveness, project completion, and follow-through on warranty work. Professionalism scores well (72) based on 24 mentions of punctuality, politeness, and communication, though negative reviews document rudeness and poor responsiveness. Project completion is the weakest dimension (62) with 18 mentions revealing multiple instances of incomplete repairs, no-shows, failure to return calls, and refusal to honor warranty work. Experience and pricing are moderately strong. The stark bifurcation suggests inconsistent service quality, possibly dependent on which technician is assigned.

• CRITICAL: Severe polarization detected — 19 five-star vs. 10 one-star reviews with minimal middle ground. This suggests either inconsistent service delivery across technicians or potential fake reviews among the five-star cluster.
• Multiple one-star reviews (2023-06-15, 2023-04-06, 2021-01-31, 2020-09-18, 2020-05-26, 2019-12-06, 2019-09-28, 2019-09-07, 2019-04-16, 2019-01-08, 2018-12-08) document serious failures: no-call-backs, rudeness, poor workmanship, failure to honor warranty repairs, and no-shows. These are specific, detailed complaints, not generic criticism.
• Five-star reviews cluster heavily in 2019-2024 with repetitive praise language ('professional,' 'friendly,' 'highly recommend') but many lack specific technical detail. Some appear generic.
• Responsiveness is a critical failure point: multiple reviews explicitly state no callbacks over 4-5 days despite repeated attempts to contact.
• Quality control concerns: reviews document electrical fire hazard (2019-12-06), incorrect plumbing technique (2021-01-31 — snaking in wrong direction), poor installation (2023-06-15 — rusted/leaking line 8 months post-install), and incomplete repairs requiring callbacks.
• Warranty work appears problematic: several reviews indicate company was unresponsive or refused to honor warranty claims or their own work.
• Recency note: Most negative reviews are 2018-2021; more recent reviews (2023-2024) are predominantly positive, suggesting possible recent operational changes or improved filtering of reviews.

This score should be treated with CAUTION. While the WW Score of 68.2 reflects the data, the extreme polarization (58% five-star, 30% one-star) and documented serious failures in responsiveness and project completion indicate this company has significant reliability and quality control issues. The score masks a bifurcated customer experience. Customers should be aware that while some report excellent service, others report dangerous workmanship, unresponsiveness, and refusal to honor warranty work. Recent reviews trend more positive, but the historical pattern of failures is substantial.

Three of four reviews are positive, praising Eric's reliability, skill, personability, and fair pricing. However, one strongly negative review explicitly states poor quality workmanship and zero value, directly contradicting the positive reviews across multiple dimensions. The negative review is particularly significant given the small sample size — with only 4 reviews, a single 1-star review with specific quality complaints carries substantial weight. Scores have been conservatively adjusted downward to reflect this meaningful dissent rather than treating it as an outlier.

• Very small sample size of only 4 reviews — WW Score should be treated as highly preliminary and unreliable.
• The three positive reviews are all dated within 3 days of each other (Feb 20–22, 2024), which is a potential flag for coordinated or solicited reviews. Language is varied enough to avoid outright dismissal, but the clustering is suspicious.
• The single 1-star review (Jan 24, 2024) explicitly cites bad quality and zero value, and references photographic evidence. This is a serious, specific complaint that cannot be dismissed.
• With only 4 total reviews, no dimension reaches HIGH confidence. All scores should be interpreted with caution.

This WW Score has very low reliability due to the extremely small review sample, a suspicious clustering of positive reviews within a 3-day window, and one explicit negative review citing poor workmanship — consumers should seek additional references before hiring.

Jacuzzi Bath Remodel exhibits a deeply polarized customer experience. While individual installers and sales staff frequently demonstrate professionalism, friendliness, and technical skill (evidenced by 58 mentions of positive professional conduct), the company's systemic failures in project completion and pricing transparency severely undermine overall trustworthiness. Project completion scores are dragged down by pervasive complaints about missed deadlines (projects extending from promised 1-2 days to 3-6+ months), poor communication, unfulfilled callbacks, and quality defects requiring multiple return visits. Pricing is consistently flagged as deceptive, with customers reporting bait-and-switch tactics, hidden charges, and quotes 2-3x higher than competitors. The company's customer service department is repeatedly described as unresponsive and unhelpful post-installation.

• SEVERE RECENCY BIAS: 40+ recent reviews (June 2025 and May 2025) are predominantly 5-star with minimal detail, praising individual workers by name with generic language ('wonderful,' 'professional,' 'friendly'). This contrasts sharply with detailed negative reviews from 2023-2024. Pattern suggests possible review manipulation or selective recent positive submissions.
• SYSTEMIC CUSTOMER SERVICE FAILURE: 35+ reviews explicitly mention unresponsive customer service, broken callback promises, and inability to reach management post-installation. This is the single most consistent complaint across the dataset.
• PROJECT COMPLETION CRISIS: 40+ reviews document severe delays (3-8 months for promised 1-2 day jobs), wrong materials ordered, parts on backorder, installation rework required, and incomplete jobs. Multiple customers report taking unpaid time off work multiple times due to rescheduled appointments.
• PRICING DECEPTION PATTERN: 25+ reviews describe high-pressure sales tactics, misleading 'free installation' claims that evaporate at quote stage, refusal to provide written estimates, and prices $10K-$15K+ higher than competitors for identical work. Several reviews mention aggressive sales behavior and unwillingness to negotiate.
• QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES: 30+ reviews document defects including water leaks, reversed hot/cold plumbing, misaligned tile, damaged fixtures, broken tiles, improper installation, and faulty workmanship requiring costly third-party repairs.
• HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS: 8+ reviews describe aggressive telemarketing (5-10 calls per day, calls at 7:30 AM, continued calls after blocking numbers, calls to people who never requested quotes). Multiple customers report being placed on 'do not call' lists with no effect.
• WARRANTY & FOLLOW-UP FAILURES: Multiple reviews report lifetime warranty is worthless due to company refusal to honor service calls, missing Costco gift cards (8+ months overdue in one case), and refusal to compensate for damages caused during installation.
• FAKE REVIEW LIKELIHOOD - MODERATE TO HIGH: The clustering of 40+ recent 5-star reviews with nearly identical phrasing ('wonderful,' 'professional,' 'friendly,' specific worker names, no substantive detail) immediately following a period of detailed 1-2 star reviews describing systemic failures suggests possible review platform manipulation. Authentic reviews typically maintain consistent detail and complaint patterns over time.
• COSTCO PARTNERSHIP CONCERN: Multiple reviews note the company is a Costco preferred vendor, yet complaints about deceptive sales tactics, aggressive upselling, and failure to honor Costco gift card promotions suggest potential breach of vendor standards.

This WW Score of 54.8 is highly reliable (HIGH confidence) due to 125 reviews with substantial detail, but the score masks a company in severe operational distress. The recent clustering of generic 5-star reviews suggests possible manipulation, making the true current performance likely worse than this score indicates. Customers should treat the HIGH confidence rating as reflecting data volume and consistency of complaints, not company quality—the overwhelming evidence points to systematic failures in project completion, pricing transparency, and post-sale customer service that make this company high-risk despite individual worker competence.

Smiley Plumbing exhibits a deeply polarized review pattern with stark contrasts between positive and negative experiences. While professionalism and project completion scores are respectable (68 and 78 respectively), the company is severely hampered by pervasive pricing complaints across 18 reviews, yielding a critically low score of 32 on the Price Friendly dimension. Positive reviews consistently praise Walt's technical skill, thoroughness, and attention to detail; however, negative reviews—predominantly from senior citizens—allege systematic overcharging, with labor rates and service fees described as exploitative. The company's experience level is solid (75), but pricing practices dominate the overall assessment, resulting in a WW Score of 54.8, indicating below-average trustworthiness.

• SEVERE PRICING PATTERN: 18 of 25 reviews explicitly mention pricing concerns. Negative reviews consistently describe charges as 'rip off,' 'scam,' or 'outrageous,' with specific examples: $500 for a 75-cent part repair, $600 labor for a $20 valve replacement, $400 for ~$50 in parts, $1,159 for a chain replacement. This is not isolated complaint noise—it is a systematic pattern.
• VULNERABLE POPULATION TARGETING: Multiple reviews (at least 8) explicitly mention senior citizens being charged exorbitant fees. Reviewers describe the owner as 'taking advantage' of elderly customers. This pattern raises ethical concerns beyond pricing disputes.
• REVIEW AUTHENTICITY CONCERN: Five positive reviews (2024, 2023, 2022, 2016, 2014) use nearly identical phrasing ('highly recommend,' 'great work,' 'professional,' 'will use again') with minimal specificity. One review (2013-12-09) reads as a defensive company response rather than a customer review. However, the negative reviews are highly detailed, specific, and emotionally authentic, suggesting they are genuine customer experiences rather than fake attacks.
• TEMPORAL PATTERN: Negative reviews cluster heavily in 2010–2017 (13 of 16 negative reviews). More recent reviews (2023–2024) are uniformly positive. This could indicate either: (a) company improvement over time, or (b) selection bias in recent reviews. Recommend treating recent positive reviews with caution given the historical pattern.
• INCONSISTENT OWNER BEHAVIOR: Reviews reference both 'Walt' and 'Shane' as owners/operators. Some reviews describe professional, honest service; others describe aggressive behavior, refusal to negotiate, and threats of lawsuits. This inconsistency suggests either multiple operators with different standards or significant behavioral variance.
• DEFENSIVE REVIEW (2013-12-09): One 5-star review reads as a company defense statement rather than a customer testimonial, using language like 'HONEST PLUMBING COMPANY' in all caps and dismissing negative reviewers as unreasonable. This is atypical customer language and reduces confidence in that review.

This WW Score of 54.8 should be treated as highly reliable due to the large sample size (25 reviews) and consistent patterns across dimensions, but the score reflects a company with serious structural issues around pricing transparency and potential exploitation of vulnerable customers. The HIGH confidence rating is justified by volume and consistency of evidence, not by positive performance. Prospective customers should proceed with extreme caution and obtain multiple independent quotes before engaging this company.