Find Nearby Plumbers In Mesa, Arizona

Insufficient Data — cannot calculate WW Score reliably. Only 1 review was analyzed. While this single review is positive across all dimensions (praising customer service, accurate quoting, same-day service, and quality workmanship), a single data point cannot establish reliable patterns or confidence in contractor performance. A minimum of 3 reviews is required to produce a trustworthy WW Score.

• Only 1 review available — sample size is critically insufficient for reliable scoring
• Review is from 2022 (over 2 years old) — recency is a concern for current contractor performance assessment

This analysis cannot be trusted as a reliable assessment of contractor quality; a minimum of 3 reviews is required to calculate a valid WW Score.

Only a single review is available, which describes a significantly negative experience. The contractor assessed the customer's drain issue as requiring expensive excavation of broken lines, a diagnosis that a second company quickly disproved by simply using a rooter machine and scoping the line. This points to a serious failure in both diagnostic skill and technical problem-solving, driving the Experience score very low. Project Completion is also scored very low, as the contractor's recommended course of action was unnecessary and the actual job was never completed by them. No data exists for Professionalism or Pricing, so those dimensions cannot be scored.

• Only 1 review is available — WW Score cannot be calculated reliably with fewer than 3 reviews.
• The sole review is a 1-star rating describing a potentially significant misdiagnosis, where the contractor recommended costly excavation that a second opinion rendered unnecessary.
• With only one data point, all scores carry extremely low confidence and should not be used to make a hiring decision.

This report is based on a single review and should be considered highly unreliable — no meaningful conclusions about this contractor's overall quality can be drawn until substantially more reviews are analyzed.

Insufficient data — only 1 review analyzed. The single review mentions reasonable pricing relative to competitors and quick, satisfactory work completion, but provides no substantive detail on professionalism or technical expertise. The review contains generic promotional language ('You should too! You will be happy you did!') that raises authenticity concerns. A minimum of 3 reviews is required to calculate a reliable WW Score.

• Only 1 review available — insufficient for reliable scoring
• Review contains suspiciously generic promotional language and enthusiastic closing statements typical of fake or self-written reviews
• No specific details provided about professionalism, communication, or workmanship quality
• Cannot assess reliability of pricing claim without competitive context from other reviews

This score cannot be calculated reliably with only 1 review. Minimum 3 reviews required. The single review's authenticity is questionable due to generic promotional tone.

Only one review is available, which limits the reliability of any scoring. That single review speaks positively to Jared's responsiveness, punctuality, and attitude, supporting a conservative but favorable professionalism score. The drain was cleared quickly and the reviewer noted clean work, providing limited evidence of competence and project follow-through. Pricing was not mentioned at all and cannot be scored. All scores are intentionally conservative given the single-review basis.

• Only 1 review analyzed — far below the minimum threshold of 3 required for a reliable WW Score.
• Pricing dimension has no data and was excluded from scoring entirely.
• Single review cannot be assessed for fake review patterns — no comparison set available.
• Review is from November 2024 and is recent, which is a positive signal, but one data point is insufficient to draw conclusions.

This score report is based on a single review and should be considered highly unreliable — significantly more reviews are needed before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn about this contractor.