This contractor receives extremely poor ratings across all measured dimensions. Two of three reviews are highly negative, citing severe professionalism issues (tardiness, inappropriate behavior, poor communication), incomplete project work, and questionable business practices. One positive review from 2015 mentions good technical knowledge and quick resolution, but lacks specificity and is heavily...
Read more Score Narrative
This contractor receives extremely poor ratings across all measured dimensions. Two of three reviews are highly negative, citing severe professionalism issues (tardiness, inappropriate behavior, poor communication), incomplete project work, and questionable business practices. One positive review from 2015 mentions good technical knowledge and quick resolution, but lacks specificity and is heavily outweighed by detailed complaints. The most recent negative review (2013) and the detailed 2017 account describe serious misconduct including unauthorized work, non-completion despite months of notice, and alleged unauthorized occupancy. With only 3 reviews total and predominantly negative evidence, reliable scoring is not possible, but available data suggests very poor performance.
Flags & Warnings
• CRITICAL: Only 3 reviews analyzed — sample size is too small for reliable WW Score calculation per Step 4 guidelines
• RECENCY CONCERN: Reviews span 2013–2017; all are older than 12 months. No recent data available to assess current performance or whether issues have been corrected
• BUSINESS STATUS UNCLEAR: 2017 review states 'His business is now closed in large part to Steawart.' Verify whether this contractor/company is still operating
• SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS: 2017 review contains allegations of unauthorized work, non-completion, and unauthorized occupancy of client property. These are not minor service complaints
• POSITIVE REVIEW QUALITY: The single 5-star review (2015) contains spelling errors ('props and safficent', 'noledge') and lacks specific detail, raising minor concerns about authenticity, though not conclusive
• CONSISTENCY OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK: Both negative reviews independently cite professionalism failures (punctuality, attitude/behavior), lending credibility to those complaints
Reliability Statement
This score should NOT be trusted for decision-making. The sample size of 3 reviews is insufficient per methodology guidelines, all reviews predate 2018, and the business may no longer be operational. If this contractor is still active, current customer references should be obtained before engaging.
Read less